Entries by Death Penalty Information Center


News 

Oct 262010

Texas Inmate May Be Executed Despite Proof of Intellectual Disability

Michael Hall was sen­tenced to death in 2000 in Texas for kid­nap­ping and mur­der. At the time of his tri­al, his IQ was mea­sured at 67. Generally, a per­son with intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty is defined as some­one with an IQ of 70 or low­er, along with lim­i­ta­tions in adap­tive skills. In 2002, the Supreme Court ruled in Atkins v. Virginia that exe­cut­ing some­one who has an intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty (men­tal retar­da­tion) con­sti­tutes cru­el and unusual…

Read More

News 

Oct 252010

NEW RESOURCES: The Atlantic Center for Capital Representation

The Atlantic Center for Capital Representation (ACCR) is a new­ly formed non-prof­it death penal­ty resource cen­ter locat­ed in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. ACCR pro­vides pre-tri­al con­sul­ta­tion to cap­i­tal defense prac­ti­tion­ers and defense teams in Pennsylvania and Delaware. They are involved in con­duct­ing statewide cap­i­tal defense train­ings, as well as pub­lic edu­ca­tion and advo­ca­cy. The ACCR is led by Marc Bookman and Dana Cook, both formerly of…

Read More

News 

Oct 222010

Sentencing Judge Second-Guesses Death Sentence In Light of New Evidence

On October 20, attor­neys for Jeffrey Landrigan filed a clemen­cy peti­tion with the Arizona Board of Executive Clemency call­ing on the Board to rec­om­mend the com­mu­ta­tion of Landrigan’s death sen­tence large­ly because of errors by his tri­al attor­neys. Landrigan’s orig­i­nal attor­neys failed to present mit­i­gat­ing evi­dence at the sen­tenc­ing hear­ing, which could have includ­ed evi­dence of brain dam­age and severe abuse. Judge Cheryl Hendrix, the judge…

Read More

News 

Oct 212010

Expert Who Predicted Future Dangerousness” in Texas Death Cases Ruled Unreliable

The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals recent­ly held that the method­ol­o­gy used by Dr. Richard Coons to predict the future dan­ger­ous­ness” of cap­i­tal defen­dants was unre­li­able. Whether a con­vict­ed defen­dant would be a future dan­ger to soci­ety is a cru­cial ques­tion for juries in Texas in choos­ing between a life or death sen­tence. Dr. Coons has tes­ti­fied in over 150 death penal­ty tri­als across the state. He admit­ted in a recent hear­ing that he had devel­oped his own…

Read More

News 

Oct 202010

ARBITRARINESS: 10% of Counties Account for All Recent Death Sentences in the U.S.

A recent arti­cle in Second Class Justice, a weblog ded­i­cat­ed to address­ing unfair­ness and dis­crim­i­na­tion in the crim­i­nal jus­tice sys­tem, high­light­ed that the death penal­ty con­tin­ues to be arbi­trar­i­ly applied in the United States. Citing fig­ures from the American Judicature Society, author Robert Smith revealed that only 10% of U.S. coun­ties account­ed for all of the death sen­tences imposed between 2004 and 2009, and only 5% of the coun­ties account­ed for all death…

Read More

News 

Oct 192010

Texas Court of Inquiry Begins Exploring Whether Executed Man Was Innocent

Lawyers for Cameron Todd Willinghams fam­i­ly recent­ly pre­sent­ed expert tes­ti­mo­ny at a court of inquiry in Texas to deter­mine whether Willingham was wrong­ful­ly con­vict­ed and exe­cut­ed for start­ing a fire that killed his chil­dren. The lawyers pre­sent­ed tes­ti­mo­ny from nine experts who have reviewed evi­dence pre­sent­ed by fire mar­shals and found many crit­i­cal errors,” as one report stat­ed. Gerald Hurst, who pub­lished a report regard­ing the evi­dence in the case,…

Read More

News 

Oct 182010

States Suddenly Acquiring Lethal Injection Drug from Unknown Source

Lawyers for Jeffrey Landrigan, an Arizona death row inmate sched­uled for exe­cu­tion on October 26, have filed a motion ask­ing courts to com­pel the state to reveal its source of a drug to be used in his lethal injec­tion. Despite a nation­wide short­age of sodi­um thiopen­tal, Arizona recent­ly announced that it has obtained new sup­plies of the drug. The announce­ment came the same day that California filed a notice in fed­er­al court that it had…

Read More

News 

Oct 142010

NEW VOICES: Police Forum –Is the Death Penalty Necessary?

On October 13, law enforce­ment offi­cers from the U.S. and Europe held the first pub­lic dis­cus­sion about whether the death penal­ty helps or hurts in keep­ing cit­i­zens safe, assists heal­ing for vic­tims, and uses crime-fight­­ing resources effi­cient­ly. The pan­elists addressed issues such as deter­rence, clo­sure to vic­tims’ fam­i­lies, and costs in rela­tion to alter­na­tives. Former Detective Superintendent Bob Denmark of Lancashire Constabulary, England, who inves­ti­gat­ed over 100

Read More

News 

Oct 132010

COSTS: Can California Confront Costs of the Death Penalty?”

A recent op-ed by Professor Gerald Uelmen of Santa Clara Law School in the Sacramento Bee high­light­ed major con­cerns about Californias death penal­ty, includ­ing its high costs and the dif­fi­cul­ty in find­ing com­pe­tent rep­re­sen­ta­tion for death row inmates. Uelmen also not­ed that California has the broad­est death penal­ty law in the coun­try, which allows for more death-eli­gi­ble offens­es than oth­er death penal­ty states. According to the op-ed, Although…

Read More

News 

Oct 122010

Supreme Court to Hear DNA Testing Case on October 13

On October 13, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear argu­ments in Skinner v. Switzer. Hank Skinner was con­vict­ed of mur­der­ing his girl­friend and her two sons in 1993 in their Texas home. He has always main­tained his inno­cence, and there is untest­ed DNA evi­dence that may prove some­one else com­mit­ted the crime. Some DNA test­ing was con­duct­ed before tri­al, plac­ing Skinner in the house where his girl­friend lived, a fact he does not dispute.

Read More