Entries by Death Penalty Information Center


News

Oct 22, 2010

Sentencing Judge Second-Guesses Death Sentence In Light of New Evidence

On October 20, attorneys for Jeffrey Landrigan filed a clemency petition with the Arizona Board of Executive Clemency calling on the Board to recommend the commutation of Landrigan’s death sentence largely because of errors by his trial attorneys. Landrigan’s original attorneys failed to present mitigating evidence at the sentencing hearing, which could have included evidence of brain damage and severe abuse. Judge Cheryl Hendrix, the judge who imposed Landrigan’s death sentence, recently…

Read More

News

Oct 21, 2010

Expert Who Predicted “Future Dangerousness” in Texas Death Cases Ruled Unreliable

The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals recently held that the methodology used by Dr. Richard Coons to predict the “future dangerousness” of capital defendants was unreliable. Whether a convicted defendant would be a future danger to society is a crucial question for juries in Texas in choosing between a life or death sentence. Dr. Coons has testified in over 150 death penalty trials across the state. He admitted in a recent hearing that he had developed his own methodology for assessing future…

Read More

News

Oct 20, 2010

ARBITRARINESS: 10% of Counties Account for All Recent Death Sentences in the U.S.

A recent article in Second Class Justice, a weblog dedicated to addressing unfairness and discrimination in the criminal justice system, highlighted that the death penalty continues to be arbitrarily applied in the United States. Citing figures from the American Judicature Society, author Robert Smith revealed that only 10% of U.S. counties accounted for all of the death sentences imposed between 2004 and 2009, and only 5% of the counties accounted for all death sentences between 2007 and 2009.

Read More

News

Oct 19, 2010

Texas Court of Inquiry Begins Exploring Whether Executed Man Was Innocent

Lawyers for Cameron Todd Willingham’s family recently presented expert testimony at a court of inquiry in Texas to determine whether Willingham was wrongfully convicted and executed for starting a fire that killed his children. The lawyers presented testimony from nine experts who have reviewed evidence presented by fire marshals and found “many critical errors,” as one report stated. Gerald Hurst, who published a report regarding the evidence in the case, argued that the evidence actually…

Read More

News

Oct 18, 2010

States Suddenly Acquiring Lethal Injection Drug from Unknown Source

Lawyers for Jeffrey Landrigan, an Arizona death row inmate scheduled for execution on October 26, have filed a motion asking courts to compel the state to reveal its source of a drug to be used in his lethal injection. Despite a nationwide shortage of sodium thiopental, Arizona recently announced that it has obtained new supplies of the drug. The announcement came the same day that California filed a notice in federal court that it had obtained the same drug with an expiration date of 2014.

Read More

News

Oct 14, 2010

NEW VOICES: Police Forum –Is the Death Penalty Necessary?

On October 13, law enforcement officers from the U.S. and Europe held the first public discussion about whether the death penalty helps or hurts in keeping citizens safe, assists healing for victims, and uses crime-fighting resources efficiently. The panelists addressed issues such as deterrence, closure to victims’ families, and costs in relation to alternatives. Former Detective Superintendent Bob Denmark of Lancashire Constabulary, England, who investigated over 100 homicides in the U.K.

Read More

News

Oct 13, 2010

COSTS: “Can California Confront Costs of the Death Penalty?”

A recent op-ed by Professor Gerald Uelmen of Santa Clara Law School in the Sacramento Bee highlighted major concerns about California’s death penalty, including its high costs and the difficulty in finding competent representation for death row inmates. Uelmen also noted that California has the broadest death penalty law in the country, which allows for more death-eligible offenses than other death penalty states. According to the op-ed, “Although death penalty laws are supposed to narrow the…

Read More

News

Oct 12, 2010

Supreme Court to Hear DNA Testing Case on October 13

On October 13, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments in Skinner v. Switzer. Hank Skinner was convicted of murdering his girlfriend and her two sons in 1993 in their Texas home. He has always maintained his innocence, and there is untested DNA evidence that may prove someone else committed the crime. Some DNA testing was conducted before trial, placing Skinner in the house where his girlfriend lived, a fact he does not dispute. Although Texas has a law allowing some post-conviction DNA…

Read More

News

Oct 11, 2010

BOOKS: “The Search for Lofie Louise”

“The Search for Lofie Louise” by Helen B. Anthony tells the true story of Louise Peete, a woman convicted of two murders in California over two decades apart in the early 1900s. She denied her guilt in both instances, and her story and trial were widely covered by the media in California. Peete received a life sentence for the first murder and a death sentence for the second; she was executed on April 11, 1947. The author captures the history of the death penalty in an earlier era. Today, the…

Read More

News

Oct 08, 2010

MULTIMEDIA: Frontline to Examine Possible Innocence of Man Executed in Texas

On October 19, PBS’s FRONTLINE will air Death by Fire, a documentary closely examining the evidence used to convict Cameron Todd Willingham of the arson deaths of his three children. The documentary will focus on a critical finding that was revealed just weeks before Willingham’s execution — that fire investigators apparently relied on outdated arson science to determine that Willingham had set the fire that killed his children. Gerald Hurst, a forensic arson expert, reviewed the evidence based…

Read More