Entries by Death Penalty Information Center


News 

Aug 012006

U.N. Human Rights Committee Urges U.S to Place Moratorium on Death Penalty

Citing the 1966 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, a United Nations pan­el rec­om­mend­ed that the United States impose a mora­to­ri­um on exe­cu­tions. The report, issued on July 28 by the U.N. Human Rights Committee, stat­ed the panel was con­cerned by stud­ies accord­ing to which the death penal­ty may be imposed dis­pro­por­tion­ate­ly on eth­nic minori­ties as well as on low-income groups, a prob­lem which does not seem to be ful­ly acknowl­edged.” The pan­el, made up of 18

Read More

News 

Jul 282006

NEW RESOURCES: Scientific American Investigates CSI Effect”

An arti­cle in the July Scientific American exam­ines the extent to which the television program C.S.I.” and sim­i­lar foren­si­­cal­­ly-focused pro­grams have increased the expec­ta­tions of jurors in crim­i­nal tri­als. The arti­cle quotes University of California, Irvine, researchers Simon Cole and Rachel Dioso ques­tion­ing the real impact of such programs: That tele­vi­sion might have an effect on court­rooms is not implau­si­ble… but to argue that C.S.I.’ and sim­i­lar shows are actu­al­ly raising the…

Read More

News 

Jul 272006

Andrea Yates Found Not Guilty By Reason of Insanity – Prosecutors Had Originally Sought Death

Four years after Andrea Yates faced the death penal­ty for the drown­ing deaths of her chil­dren, a sec­ond jury found her not guilty by rea­son of insan­i­ty. In Yates’ first cap­i­tal mur­der tri­al in 2002, jurors con­vict­ed her of mur­der and rec­om­mend­ed a sen­tence of life in prison. That con­vic­tion was over­turned on appeal last year after it was shown that the state’s psy­chi­atric wit­ness pre­sent­ed false tes­ti­mo­ny. In the sec­ond tri­al, jurors delib­er­at­ed for 13 hours before find­ing that Yates…

Read More

News 

Jul 272006

California Blue Ribbon Commission Recommends Recording of Interrogations

The California Commission on the Fair Administration of Justice has unan­i­mous­ly rec­om­mend­ed that state law­mak­ers require elec­tron­ic record­ing of all jail­house inter­ro­ga­tions. The com­mis­sion added that the law should include a pro­vi­sion stat­ing that if an offi­cer fails to record an inter­ro­ga­tion, jurors would be instruct­ed to view the defen­dan­t’s state­ment with cau­tion. Emphasizing that false con­fes­sions have been iden­ti­fied as the sec­ond most fre­quent cause of wrongful…

Read More

News 

Jul 252006

Delaware Executions On Hold As Lethal Injection Challenge Considered

Delaware is the most recent state to have its exe­cu­tions halt­ed while courts exam­ine whether the state’s lethal injec­tion pro­ce­dures are cru­el and unusu­al. Similar con­sti­tu­tion­al chal­lenges have effec­tive­ly put exe­cu­tions on hold in California, New Jersey, Florida, and Missouri. In a meet­ing with Delaware offi­cials, Chief District Judge Sue L. Robinson ordered the state to respond to a law­suit filed by Robert W. Jackson, whose sched­uled May 19 exe­cu­tion was stayed so that his lethal injection…

Read More

News 

Jul 252006

NEW RESOURCES: Comprehensive Registry of California Executions, 1851 – 2005

Legal Executions in California: A Comprehensive Registry, 1851 – 2005,” by researchers Sheila O’Hare, Irene Berry, and Jesse Silva, pro­vides com­pre­hen­sive infor­ma­tion on legal exe­cu­tions in California from 1851 to the present. Starting with the year the Criminal Practices Act first autho­rized exe­cu­tions in the state, the book’s entries are orga­nized by year of exe­cu­tion and con­tain the felon’s name, race, age at death and a detailed nar­ra­tive of the crime that result­ed in the death sentence.

Read More

News 

Jul 242006

New Jersey Commission Weighs Whether Death Penalty Should be Continued

During its first pub­lic hear­ing on cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment, the New Jersey Death Penalty Study Commission heard tes­ti­mo­ny from wit­ness­es rep­re­sent­ing a broad spec­trum of opin­ions. Almost all those tes­ti­fy­ing spoke against retain­ing the death penal­ty. Among those who tes­ti­fied before the 13-mem­ber pan­el were legal experts, reli­gious lead­ers, mur­der vic­tims’ fam­i­ly mem­bers, and exonerees such as Larry Peterson, who spent 18 years in a New Jersey prison for a rape and mur­der he did not commit. …

Read More

News 

Jul 232006

Texas Office Investigating Possible Wrongful Execution Shows Signs of Bias

Based on taped con­ver­sa­tions among mem­bers of the Bexar County pros­e­cu­tor’s office, some par­tic­i­pants in the inves­ti­ga­tion of the case of Ruben Cantu may have made up their minds before talk­ing to those who now assert that Cantu was inno­cent. Cantu was exe­cut­ed in Texas in 1993. Significant evi­dence has emerged from a vic­­tim-wit­­ness and from a co-defen­­dant that Texas may have exe­cut­ed the wrong man. The senior District Attorney, Mike Beers, said on tape, before inter­view­ing the witnesseses,…

Read More

News 

Jul 192006

PUBLIC OPINION: Wisconsin Voters Favor Life Without Parole Over Death Penalty

In a recent University of Wisconsin Badger Poll, more respon­dents favored a sen­tence of life with­out parole rather than the death penal­ty. Only 45% sup­port­ed cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment, while 50% favored life sen­tences. When asked about the death penal­ty in the­o­ry, with­out any alter­na­tive sen­tences men­tioned, 55.6% of Wisconsinites polled favored cap­i­tal punishment for cas­es involv­ing a per­son who is con­vict­ed of first degree inten­tion­al homi­cides, if the con­vic­tion is sup­port­ed by DNA evi­dence.” In…

Read More