Entries by Death Penalty Information Center


News 

Dec 212004

Massachusetts’ Foolproof Death Penalty” Idea Achieves Questionable Status

In its annu­al eclec­tic col­lec­tion of ideas from the past year, The New York Times Magazine included the Foolproof Death Penalty” propsed by Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney. The Times attempts to salute the absurd­ly wide range of human orig­i­nal­i­ty” and culls its entries not only from main­stream sources but also from the tat­too cul­ture and fast food man­age­ment, hor­ti­cul­ture and shoe design.” In response to Romney’s notion of error-free cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment,” Berkeley law professor…

Read More

News 

Dec 212004

Poll Finds Waning Support for Death Penalty

According to a recent poll con­duct­ed by the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute, only 62% of respon­dents sup­port cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment for per­sons con­vict­ed of mur­der, and Americans pre­fer the sen­tenc­ing option of life with­out parole when giv­en the choice. Overall sup­port for cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment has fall­en since Quinnipiac’s poll in June 2004, when sup­port reg­is­tered 65%. Similar shifts in pub­lic opin­ion found grow­ing sup­port for life-with­­out-parole sen­tences. In the December poll when…

Read More

News 

Dec 202004

California Plans $220 Million Death Row While Inmates Wait 4 Years to Start Appeal

California already has the largest death row in the coun­try and is now plan­ning to build a new $220 mil­lion facil­i­ty designed to house more than 1,400 death row inmates. State Supreme Court Chief Justice Ronald M. George said that the large death row reflects the con­se­quences of a care­ful appeals process that is designed to ensure due process for those facing execution. The virtues of the sys­tem also rep­re­sent its vices because it does end up caus­ing a lot of delay,” stat­ed the Chief…

Read More

News 

Dec 172004

Kansas Death Penalty Statute Ruled Unconstitutional

The Kansas Supreme Court has ruled that the state’s 1994 death penal­ty law is uncon­sti­tu­tion­al because it con­tains a pro­vi­sion giv­ing the state an advan­tage when jurors find the aggra­vat­ing and mit­i­gat­ing fac­tors pre­sent­ed at sen­tenc­ing to be equal. In that cir­cum­stance, the cur­rent law states that the defen­dant must be sen­tenced to death. The Court ruled that such a pro­vi­sion does not allow the jury to express a rea­soned moral response to the evi­dence, and the process does not comport…

Read More

News 

Dec 162004

NEW VOICES: Manhattan’s DA Says Death Penalty Exacts a terrible price”

As New York law­mak­ers con­duct­ed the first in a series of hear­ings on the state’s death penal­ty, Robert M. Morgenthau, Manhattan’s long-serv­ing District Attorney, rec­om­mend­ed that New York aban­don the practice: It’s the deed that teach­es, not the name we give it,” Morgenthau said, quot­ing George Bernard Shaw. He went on to note, The penal­ty exacts a ter­ri­ble price in dol­lars, lives, and human decen­cy. Rather than tamp­ing down the flames of vio­lence, it fuels them.…I urge all of our…

Read More

News 

Dec 152004

NEW VOICES: Andrew Cuomo Calls for Reexamination of NY’s Death Penalty

Andrew Cuomo (pic­tured), who served as U.S. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development from 1997 to 2001, recent­ly urged New York law­mak­ers to put an end to the death penal­ty. The state is hold­ing hear­ings on cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment in the wake of a N.Y. Court of Appeals deci­sion find­ing the statute uncon­sti­tu­tion­al ear­li­er this year. In his op-ed in The New York Times, Cuomo not­ed: The Democrats, who con­trol the Assembly, should make it clear that they will not pass a new death penal­ty law. This…

Read More

News 

Dec 142004

Supreme Court Clarifies the Application of Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel Standards

On December 13, 2004, the U. S. Supreme Court ruled that the effec­tive­ness of defense coun­sel’s per­for­mance must be judged by stan­dards pre­vi­ous­ly set out by the Court in Strickland v. Washington. In Florida v. Nixon, Joe Nixon’s attor­ney told the jury his client was guilty with­out his clien­t’s express con­sent. After the jury sen­tenced Nixon to death, the Florida Supreme Court over­turned Nixon’s con­vic­tion, hold­ing that coun­sel’s con­ces­sion of guilt auto­mat­i­cal­ly fell below an objective…

Read More

News 

Dec 142004

Supreme Court to Consider Impact of International Ruling in Death Penalty Cases

On December 10, 2004 (Human Rights Day), the United States Supreme Court agreed to hear the case of Jose Medellin to deter­mine what effect the United States should give to a recent rul­ing by the International Court of Justice at the Hague, the United Nations’ high­est court. In the case of Medellin and 50 oth­er Mexican nation­als on death row, the World Court ruled that the U.S. failed to inform Mexico of their arrests, in vio­la­tion of the 1963 Vienna Convention on Consular Relations. This…

Read More

News 

Dec 102004

NEW RESOURCE: Center on Wrongful Convictions Examines The Snitch System”

The Center on Wrongful Convictions at Northwestern University School of Law has released a new report enti­tled, The Snitch System: How Snitch Testimony Sent Randy Steidl and Other Innocent Americans to Death Row. The report high­lights 51 cas­es of Americans who were wrong­ful­ly con­vict­ed and giv­en death sen­tences based on the tes­ti­mo­ny of wit­ness­es with incen­tives to lie. According to the Center, snitch tes­ti­mo­ny is the pri­ma­ry cause for approx­i­mate­ly 45% of all wrongful capital…

Read More