Entries by Death Penalty Information Center

An 8‑part series titled ​“Murder, Race, Justice: The State vs. Darryl Hunt” exam­ines the case against Darryl Hunt, who has been in prison in North Carolina for near­ly 20 years despite cred­i­ble evi­dence of his inno­cence. The series con­cludes a six-month inves­ti­ga­tion con­duct­ed by The Winston-Salem Journal that found that police used ques­tion­able tac­tics and unre­li­able wit­ness­es to con­vict Hunt for the 1984 rape and mur­der of reporter Deborah Sykes. It also reveals that instead of…

In his latest book, ​“Ultimate Punishment: A Lawyer’s Reflections on Dealing with the Death Penalty,” attor­ney and author Scott Turow pro­vides a detailed look at his per­son­al jour­ney with the death penal­ty issue from his days as a fed­er­al pros­e­cu­tor to his more recent ser­vice as a mem­ber of the Illinois Commission on Capital Punishment. In addi­tion to Turow’s first-hand account, the book ana­lyzes the poten­tial rea­sons for and against the death penal­ty, dis­cuss­es its impact on vic­tims’ families…

In a report exam­in­ing Virginia’s death penal­ty sys­tem, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has urged the state to enact a mora­to­ri­um on exe­cu­tions until its flawed cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment sys­tem is reformed. The report, ​“Broken Justice: The Death Penalty in Virginia,” reviews issues such as the qual­i­ty of defense coun­sel, pros­e­cu­to­r­i­al mis­con­duct, racial bias, inno­cence, and the exe­cu­tion of those with men­tal retar­da­tion and juve­nile offend­ers. The find­ings, which were endorsed by a…

Psychiatrist Cynthia Smith, who served as a key wit­ness in the 1990 death penal­ty case against John Daniels of North Carolina, has recant­ed her tes­ti­mo­ny because state pros­e­cu­tors with­held impor­tant infor­ma­tion from her. ​“My tes­ti­mo­ny was erro­neous with gross errors. Not only did the pros­e­cu­tion fail to give me all the rel­e­vant infor­ma­tion, I did not look for the infor­ma­tion either,” White said in an affi­davit about the tes­ti­mo­ny she gave in her first and only cap­i­tal case. She added, ​“John…

The U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) released its year­ly report on cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment on November 4, 2003. The fig­ures report­ed were for the year 2002. (See also DPIC’s Year End Report 2002). The BJS report­ed that death sen­tences in the U.S. have declined for four straight years, drop­ping by almost 50% since 1998. DPIC will release a report with 2003 fig­ures in mid-December 2003. Read Capital Punishment,…

In a Seattle Times op-ed reflect­ing on the plea agree­ment for ser­i­al killer Gary Ridgway result­ing in a life with­out parole sen­tence (read more), Washington State Superior Court Judge David A. Nichols stat­ed that the ​“death penal­ty as a response to any crim­i­nal behav­ior no longer has valid­i­ty and should be repealed, because it is impos­si­ble to admin­is­ter with jus­tice and fair­ness.” He further…

Evidence from a cap­i­tal mur­der case and sev­en oth­er cas­es test­ed for DNA by the Houston Police Department’s crime lab have been destroyed. The District Attorney’s office said that it may have to ask for par­dons in these cas­es if the defen­dants were con­vict­ed large­ly on the weight of DNA evidence. ​“We’re going to have to alert the judges and the defense attor­neys and eval­u­ate each case to see what we have got to sup­port the con­vic­tion with­out the DNA. If DNA played a large role, I may be…

A review of death penal­ty defense poli­cies in Texas has uncov­ered wide­spread non­com­pli­ance with state laws that require each region to adopt qual­i­fi­ca­tion stan­dards for cap­i­tal defense attor­neys. Only two of the nine judi­cial regions in Texas have adopt­ed the stan­dards. A report on the find­ings has been pub­lished by the Equal Justice Center, a Texas orga­ni­za­tion that advo­cates for greater fair­ness in the jus­tice sys­tem, and the Texas Defender Service, an orga­ni­za­tion ded­i­cat­ed to improving…

By a vote of 357 – 67, the U.S. House of Representatives passed leg­is­la­tion des­ig­nat­ing $25 mil­lion in fund­ing over five years for DNA test­ing that could help prove the inno­cence of some death row inmates. The bill also pro­vides fund­ing for states to improve the qual­i­ty of legal rep­re­sen­ta­tion for those fac­ing cap­i­tal charges. The bipar­ti­san-sup­­port­ed bill, enti­tled The Advancing Justice Through DNA Technology Act of 2003 (H.R. 3214), includes a com­pre­hen­sive pack­age of pro­grams that provides…