Entries by Death Penalty Information Center


News 

Jun 262003

Houston DNA Lab Investigation Prompts Calls for Recusal

As inves­ti­ga­tors con­tin­ue to scru­ti­nize the Houston Crime Lab’s his­to­ry of shod­dy prac­tices and inac­cu­rate test results, includ­ing evi­dence in cap­i­tal cas­es, an op-ed in the Houston Chronicle called for District Attorney Chuck Rosenthal and Houston Police Chief Clarence Bradford to recuse them­selves from the inves­ti­ga­tion to ensure…

Read More

News 

Jun 262003

Texas Lags on Supreme Court’s Mental Retardation Ruling

Texas leg­is­la­tors have failed to pass laws that could bring the state into com­pli­ance with the U.S. Supreme Court’s rul­ing in Atkins v. Virginia that bans the exe­cu­tion of those with men­tal retar­da­tion. Nearly a year after the Court’s rul­ing in Atkins, Texas offi­cials have no idea how many of the 449 death row inmates have the dis­abil­i­ty, and no safe­guards to ensure that those affect­ed by the rul­ing are not put to death. Most of the leg­isla­tive efforts have focused on…

Read More

News 

Jun 262003

FBI Report Reveals Murder Rate Rise in the South

According to the FBIs Preliminary Uniform Crime Report for 2002, the mur­der rate in the South increased by 2.1% while the mur­der rate in the Northeast decreased by almost 5%. The South accounts for 82% of all exe­cu­tions since 1976; the Northeast accounts for…

Read More

News 

Jun 262003

NEW RESOURCE: Report Reviews Prosecutorial Misconduct

Harmful Error,” a new report released by the The Center for Public Integrity, is the end prod­uct of an exten­sive two-year review of pros­e­cu­to­r­i­al mis­con­duct around the nation. The report notes that while many local pros­e­cu­tors per­form their dif­fi­cult work admirably, inad­ver­tent and inten­tion­al mis­con­duct still per­me­ates some dis­trict attor­neys’ offices. Among oth­er pieces of valu­able infor­ma­tion con­tained in the report,​“Harmful Error” doc­u­ments cases in…

Read More

News 

Jun 262003

U.S. Supreme Court Rules Lawyers Failed Client, Voids Death Sentence

By a vote of 7 – 2, the U.S. Supreme Court has thrown out the death sen­tence of Maryland death row inmate Kevin Wiggins, rul­ing that his inex­pe­ri­enced attor­neys failed to ade­quate­ly rep­re­sent him at tri­al. Wiggins’ orig­i­nal lawyers made no attempt to inform mem­bers of the jury that sent Wiggins to death row that their client was repeat­ed­ly raped, beat­en and denied food as a child, and that his moth­er burned his hands on the stove as pun­ish­ment. In an opin­ion authored by…

Read More