DPI Podcast: Discussions With DPI
Lawyers for the Condemned
ABA Guidelines and Standards for Capital Representation
American Bar Association's recommended standards for counsel in capital cases
Overview
The quality of representation a defendant receives in a capital case can make the difference between life and death. Almost all defendants cannot afford to pay for a lawyer, and states differ widely on the standards — if any — for death penalty representation. Accounts of lawyers sleeping or drinking alcohol during the trial, lawyers with racial bias toward their client, lawyers who conduct no investigation or fail to obtain necessary experts, or lawyers simply having no experience with capital cases have been rampant throughout the history of the death penalty.
The right to an attorney is a hallmark of the American judicial system. It is essential that the lawyer be experienced in capital cases, be adequately compensated, and have access to the resources needed to fulfill his or her obligations to the client and the court.
As abuses in the system have been exposed, most states have raised the standards for representation. However, most death-penalty states do not have statewide capital defense organizations, and many counties who are responsible for assigning and compensating lawyers have small budgets and cannot afford the kind of representation a capital case requires.
At Issue
Despite the poor quality of representation in many capital cases, courts have often upheld the convictions and death sentences imposed because of low expectations and the belief that better representation would not have made a difference in the case. Where higher quality counsel and adequate resources have been provided, death sentences have declined dramatically.
What DPIC Offers
DPI has highlighted the key court decisions in this area, as well as the numerous instances in which the system has failed. A number of DPI’s reports discuss the importance of quality representation. The standards for representation approved by the American Bar Association, along with the status of state compliance, are also available.
News & Developments
News
May 27, 2026
Article of Interest: Academic Chapter Examines the Use of Neuroscience Evidence in Brain Injury Cases Across 6 Countries
In her chapter of the newly published book Neuroscience in Criminal Justice Systems: The Positive Impact of Neurojustice, Fordham Law Professor and Founding Director of the Neuroscience and Law Center Deborah Denno explores the use of neuroscientific evidence in criminal cases involving brain injury, both from external causes (e.g., car accidents or gunshot wounds) and internal causes (e.g., dementia or alcohol-induced brain damage). The chapter titled,“The…
Read MoreNews
May 20, 2026
130,000 People Urge Clemency for Tony Carruthers in Advance of Tennessee’s Planned Execution
Absent court action, Tony Carruthers is scheduled to be executed in Tennessee on May 21, 2026, despite untested DNA evidence, an innocence claim, and serious mental illness concerns. On May 18, faith leaders, civil rights advocates and community members marched to the state capitol to urge Governor Bill Lee to grant Mr. Carruthers clemency or stay his execution to allow additional DNA testing, delivering a petition with over 130,000 signatures. Gov. Lee…
Read MoreNews
May 18, 2026
What to Know: DOJ Seeks to Fast-Track Appeals for Death-Sentenced Prisoners Through “Opt-In” Certification Process Without Considering Opposing Views
The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) wants to fast-track death penalty appeals and has proposed a new set of regulations designed to facilitate that process. If implemented, the proposed rule would allow the Attorney General to“certify” active death penalty states like Texas, Florida, and Alabama, resulting in shorter filing deadlines and restricted federal court review, among other changes intended to move appeals through the courts more quickly. The rule as…
Read MoreNews
Apr 14, 2026
Tennessee Scheduled to Execute Tony Carruthers Despite Untested DNA Evidence, Innocence Concerns, and Mental Illness
With weeks left before his scheduled execution on May 21, 2026, counsel for Tennessee death-sentenced prisoner Tony Carruthers has asked the Tennessee Supreme Court to order DNA testing that they argue could prove their client’s innocence. On April 9, lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed an emergency motion seeking DNA testing“on specific pieces of probative physical evidence, most of which has never been tested, and which will likely point to…
Read MoreNews
Feb 24, 2026
Scheduled Execution of Billy Kearse Renews Constitutional Alarms About Pace of Executions in Florida
“I am extremely concerned by the recent pace of death warrants and the speed with which the parties and involved entities must carry out their respective duties.” Florida Supreme Court Justice Jorge Labarga wrote those words in 2023, a year in which Florida conducted six executions with an average warrant period of 36 days. Such a pace was already straining the state’s judicial, legal, and prison systems. But in 2025, under the sole authority of Governor Ron DeSantis, the…
Read More


