In an order dat­ed February 11, 2026, U.S. District Court Judge Timothy J. Kelly issued a pre­lim­i­nary injunc­tion tem­porar­i­ly block­ing the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment from trans­fer­ring many for­mer fed­er­al­ly death-sen­tenced pris­on­ers to the noto­ri­ous Administrative Maximum Facility in Florence, Colorado, known as ADX.” Judge Kelly found it like­ly” that the gov­ern­ment vio­lat­ed the pris­on­ers’ Fifth Amendment due process rights when it deprived them of a mean­ing­ful oppor­tu­ni­ty to chal­lenge” their trans­fer des­ig­na­tion process, which was char­ac­ter­ized as a sham.” The order will stay in place as the law­suit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) on behalf of twen­ty-one pris­on­ers, led by plain­tiff Rejon Taylor, is pur­sued in the courts. 

[I]t is like­ly their redes­ig­na­tions were deter­mined before their process even began, and that — despite their hear­ings and appeals — they had no mean­ing­ful oppor­tu­ni­ty to challenge them[.]”

-U.S. District Court Judge Timothy J. Kelly 

In his order, Judge Kelly, appoint­ed by President Trump, points to evi­dence pre­sent­ed in the law­suit that the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Bureau of Prisons (BOP) depart­ed from estab­lished poli­cies and pro­ce­dures to effec­tu­ate the pris­on­ers’ trans­fer. Judge Kelly point­ed­ly notes a gap between what Defendants say and what Defendants did” (empha­sis in orig­i­nal). He adds, the Constitution requires that when­ev­er the gov­ern­ment seeks to deprive a per­son of a lib­er­ty or prop­er­ty inter­est that the Due Process Clause pro­tects — whether that per­son is a noto­ri­ous pris­on­er or a law-abid­ing cit­i­zen — the process it pro­vides can­not be a sham.” 

Judge Kelly notes that Attorney General Bondi was [] trans­par­ent about seek­ing to pun­ish Plaintiffs by send­ing them to ADX Florence,” pub­licly promis­ing that Plaintiffs will spend the rest of their lives” there. Quoting from the law­suit, Judge Kelly describes ADX as phys­i­cal­ly con­struct­ed and oper­at­ed” to sub­ject inmates to con­di­tions [that] are more social­ly iso­lat­ing than those at any [oth­er] cor­rec­tion­al facil­i­ty.” According to Judge Kelly, the BOP itself rec­og­nizes the harsh con­di­tions” at ADX and BOP reg­u­la­tions gov­ern­ing refer­rals state that redes­ig­na­tion to anoth­er high secu­ri­ty insti­tu­tion should be considered first.” 

Judge Kelly cites to numer­ous con­ver­sa­tions between attor­neys for the pris­on­ers and BOP attor­ney Christopher Synsvoll, in which Mr. Synsvoll admit­ted that refer­rals were not based on the BOP’s assess­ment of the pris­on­ers’ secu­ri­ty needs or of insti­tu­tion­al resources” but were due to President Trump’s January 20, 2025, Executive Order, and a relat­ed mem­o­ran­dum issued by Attorney General Bondi.” The Executive Order directs the Attorney General to take all law­ful and appro­pri­ate action to ensure” that the pris­on­ers are housed in con­di­tions con­sis­tent with the mon­stros­i­ty of their crimes and the threats they pose.” 

Prior to the start of the cur­rent admin­is­tra­tion, BOP offi­cials had already eval­u­at­ed the com­mut­ed pris­on­ers, and none of them were deter­mined appro­pri­ate for trans­fer to ADX. That abrupt­ly changed with the arrival of the new admin­is­tra­tion. According to Mr. Synsvoll, BOP com­mit­tee mem­bers had been informed that the President and Attorney General[ Bondi]’s office were indi­cat­ing that every­one need­ed to be referred to ADX.” Judge Kelly quot­ed from anoth­er instance, cit­ed in the law­suit, where an offi­cial over­see­ing an admin­is­tra­tive hear­ing, iden­ti­fied as Joseph Brian Wilson admit­ted that … he had to do what [Attorney General Bondi] direct­ed him to do.” One pris­on­er report­ed that when he asked Mr. Wilson if he would rec­om­mend him to ADX no mat­ter what he said to him dur­ing the hear­ing, Mr. Wilson replied yes.” In light of this evi­dence, Judge Kelly said, “[i]t strains creduli­ty to believe that sub­or­di­nate BOP offi­cials car­ry­ing out this process felt free to dis­agree with what had been demand­ed at the start by offi­cials far senior to them, with author­i­ty over their careers and livelihoods.” 

The Court con­cludes [], it is like­ly that the [redes­ig­na­tion] process pro­vid­ed to Plaintiffs was an emp­ty exer­cise to approve an out­come that was decid­ed before it even began, there­by con­tra­ven­ing their due process rights.” 

-U.S. District Court Judge Timothy J. Kelly 

Judge Kelly agreed that if the pris­on­ers can prove dur­ing the course of their pend­ing suit that their redes­ig­na­tions to ADX Florence were ful­ly decid­ed at the begin­ning of the process rather than the end” it would amount to a vio­la­tion of their Fifth Amendment due process rights. He con­clud­ed, say­ing it is like­ly that the process pro­vid­ed to Plaintiffs was an emp­ty exer­cise to approve an out­come that was decid­ed before it even began[.]” He also dis­missed the two juris­dic­tion­al hur­dles the gov­ern­ment raised, includ­ing the government’s asser­tion of sov­er­eign immu­ni­ty, which the court said does not bar the con­sti­tu­tion­al claim raised by the prisoners. 

Citation Guide