Policy

Deterrence

Studies find no meaningful evidence that use of the death penalty deters crime.

DPI Podcast: Discussions With DPIC

DPI Podcast: Discussions With DPIC

Does Capital Punishment Deter Murder? Exploring mur­der rates, killings of police offi­cers, and the death penalty

DPI Page: Murder Rates

DPI Page: Murder Rates

View DPI's information about state-by-state murder rates. State and regional murder statistics show no correlation between use of the death penalty and reduced crime.

Overview

Deterrence is prob­a­bly the most com­mon­ly expressed ratio­nale for the death penal­ty. The essence of the the­o­ry is that the threat of being exe­cut­ed in the future will be suf­fi­cient to cause a sig­nif­i­cant num­ber of peo­ple to refrain from com­mit­ting a heinous crime they had oth­er­wise planned. Deterrence is not prin­ci­pal­ly con­cerned with the pre­ven­tion of fur­ther killing by an already con­vict­ed death-penal­ty defen­dant. That falls under the top­ic of incapacitation.

Deterrence should not be con­sid­ered in a vac­u­um. The crit­i­cal ques­tion is not whether poten­tial crim­i­nals will be dis­suad­ed from killing because they would face the death penal­ty rather than no pun­ish­ment at all. Other pun­ish­ments such as life with­out parole might pro­vide equal deter­rence at far less costs and with­out the atten­dant risk of exe­cut­ing an inno­cent per­son. Whether the death penal­ty is a proven method of low­er­ing the mur­der rate has been sub­ject­ed to many stud­ies over many decades.

It is not enough to com­pare juris­dic­tions with the death penal­ty to those with­out unless the study con­trols for the many oth­er vari­ables that could affect the mur­der rate. For exam­ple, low­er unem­ploy­ment rates cor­re­late with low­er crime rates. More police involve­ment in the local com­mu­ni­ty seems to reduce crime. The death penal­ty affects only a tiny per­cent­age of even those who com­mit mur­der. Its effect is very dif­fi­cult to pin­point, and the National Academy of Sciences has con­clud­ed that past stud­ies have nei­ther proven nor dis­proven a deterrent effect.

At Issue

If the death penal­ty is not a proven deter­rent to mur­der, is it worth the exces­sive costs, risks of error, uncer­tain­ty of com­ple­tion, and oth­er prob­lems that are inher­ent to its prac­tice? On the polit­i­cal lev­el, the deter­rent val­ue of the death penal­ty is often tak­en for grant­ed with­out a care­ful exam­i­na­tion of the research or a con­sid­er­a­tion of less risky alter­na­tives. This is espe­cial­ly rel­e­vant giv­en that death penal­ty use has been declin­ing dra­mat­i­cal­ly. Most states are not car­ry­ing out any exe­cu­tions in a given year.

What DPI Offers

DPI has col­lect­ed many of the deter­rent stud­ies that have been con­duct­ed in the mod­ern era and has sum­ma­rized their results. It also pro­vides some of the raw data on which such stud­ies rely, such as the mur­der rate for each state in each year in the mod­ern era, along with the num­ber of exe­cu­tions and death sen­tences for each state in the same periods.

News & Developments


News

Mar 04, 2026

What to Know: Deterrence and the Death Penalty

DPI’s​“What to Know” series exam­ines cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment from mul­ti­ple angles, one top­ic at a time. Each install­ment pro­vides essen­tial facts and data on spe­cif­ic aspects of the death penal­ty. Why it mat­ters: Deterrence is among the most com­mon­ly cit­ed jus­ti­fi­ca­tions for the death penal­ty, yet decades of research have failed to pro­duce cred­i­ble evi­dence that use of the death penal­ty has an impact on homi­cide rates. ### Key Facts: — 88% of the nation’s…

Read More

News

Dec 04, 2025

When Conservative Principles Meet 48 Years of Injustice

Glynn Simmons keeps a copy of his death war­rant, signed by the Oklahoma gov­er­nor 50 years ago, order­ing his exe­cu­tion in the elec­tric chair. He was 22 years old at the time, con­vict­ed of a mur­der he did not com­mit. Forty-eight years lat­er, after becom­ing the longest-incar­­cer­at­ed wrong­ful­ly con­vict­ed per­son in U.S. his­to­ry, Mr. Simmons’ sto­ry has become cen­tral to a grow­ing con­ser­v­a­tive move­ment ques­tion­ing cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment — one that Nan Tolson is…

Read More

News

Oct 30, 2025

Low Death Sentencing, Lack of Deterrence, and High Costs Raise Questions Over Capital Punishment in Indiana

Indiana’s seem­ing­ly para­dox­i­cal resump­tion of exe­cu­tions, with three over the last year, is draw­ing scruti­ny from many cor­ners of the state. Governor Mike Braun, leg­is­la­tors from both polit­i­cal par­ties, pub­lic defend­ers and even pros­e­cu­tors have raised ques­tions about the costs of pros­e­cut­ing cap­i­tal cas­es and obtain­ing drugs for exe­cu­tions; the fail­ure of cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment to deter crime; and the increas­ing reluc­tance of Indiana juries to sentence…

Read More

News

Sep 12, 2025

30 Years Ago, South Africa Abolished the Death Penalty to Prioritize Life and Dignity

30 years ago, the new­ly formed Constitutional Court of South Africa issued a land­mark deci­sion abol­ish­ing the death penal­ty and pri­or­i­tiz­ing the core con­sti­tu­tion­al rights to life and dig­ni­ty above all else. Published on June 6, 1995, the Court’s opin­ion in S v. Makwanyane drew on inter­na­tion­al legal frame­works, as well as death penal­ty debates in oth­er coun­tries, such as the United States. The Court weighed inher­ent issues in the appli­ca­tion of the death…

Read More

News

Aug 25, 2025

State Spotlight: California Death Row Shrinks Sharply in 2024, Driven by the Resentencing of At Least 45 People to Life Sentences or Less

This week we are fea­tur­ing some arti­cles from the first part of 2025 that we think are worth anoth­er look. We’ll be back with new arti­cles next week. This arti­cle orig­i­nal­ly ran on February 11, 2025. When California Governor Gavin Newsom announced a mora­to­ri­um on exe­cu­tions in 2019, he said that the state’s​“death penal­ty sys­tem has been, by all mea­sures, a fail­ure.” He explained that the death penal­ty​“has dis­crim­i­nat­ed against defen­dants who are mentally ill,…

Read More