The 2% Death Penalty: How a Minority of Counties Produce Most Death Cases at Enormous Costs to All

Executive Summary Top

Contrary to the assump­tion that the death penal­ty is wide­ly prac­ticed across the coun­try, it is actu­al­ly the domain of a small per­cent­age of U.S. coun­ties in a hand­ful of states. The bur­dens cre­at­ed by this nar­row but aggres­sive use, how­ev­er, are shift­ed to the major­i­ty of coun­ties that almost nev­er use it.

The dis­parate and high­ly clus­tered use of the death penal­ty rais­es seri­ous ques­tions of unequal and arbi­trary appli­ca­tion of the law. It also forces the juris­dic­tions that have resist­ed the death penal­ty for decades to pay for a cost­ly legal process that is often marred with injustice.

Only 2% of the coun­ties in the U.S. have been respon­si­ble for the major­i­ty of cas­es lead­ing to exe­cu­tions since 1976. Likewise, only 2% of the coun­ties are respon­si­ble for the major­i­ty of today’s death row pop­u­la­tion and recent death sen­tences. To put it anoth­er way, all of the state exe­cu­tions since the death penal­ty was rein­stat­ed stem from cas­es in just 15% of the coun­ties in the U.S. All of the 3,125 inmates on death row as of January 1, 2013 came from just 20% of the counties.

Each deci­sion to seek the death penal­ty is made by a sin­gle coun­ty dis­trict attor­ney, who is answer­able only to the vot­ers of that coun­ty. Nevertheless, all state tax­pay­ers will have to bear the sub­stan­tial finan­cial costs of each death penal­ty case, and some of the costs will even be borne on a national level.

The coun­ties that use the death penal­ty the most have some of the high­est rever­sal rates and many have been respon­si­ble for errors of egre­gious injus­tice. As their cas­es are reversed, more mon­ey will be spent on retri­als and fur­ther appeals. For example:

  • Maricopa County in Arizona had four times the num­ber of pend­ing death penal­ty cas­es as Los Angeles or Houston on a per capi­ta basis. The District Attorney respon­si­ble for this aggres­sive use was recent­ly dis­barred for misconduct.
  • Philadelphia County, with the third largest num­ber of inmates on death row in the coun­try, ranked low­est in the state in pay­ing attor­neys rep­re­sent­ing those inmates.
  • During the tenure of one dis­trict attor­ney in New Orleans, four death row inmates were exon­er­at­ed and freed because of pros­e­cu­to­r­i­al mis­con­duct, bring­ing a sting­ing rebuke from four Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court.

Some states have recent­ly cho­sen to opt out of this process alto­geth­er, great­ly lim­it­ing their oblig­a­tions for its high costs and dis­re­pute. As the death penal­ty is seen more as the insis­tent cam­paign of a few at tremen­dous cost to the many, more states may fol­low that course.


(Click to enlarge; right-click to download.)
(Click to enlarge; right-click to download.)
(Click to enlarge; right-click to download.)
(Click to enlarge; right-click to download.)
(Click to enlarge; right-click to download.)

Additional Information Top

An info­graph­ic with data from the report from the Huffington Post, October 102013:

Video
(Click on image to nav­i­gate to original article.)