Baltimore Sun

January 282004

Editorial

In America, young­sters under the age of 18 can’t buy cig­a­rettes. They can’t be served a cock­tail in a bar or pick up a six-pack of beer. They can’t vote. They can’t own prop­er­ty out­right. And yet, exe­cut­ing some­one who com­mit­ted a heinous crime at age 16 or 17 is per­mis­si­ble in this soci­ety. Condoned in 22 states. Practiced vig­or­ous­ly in at least one, Texas. Only in America.

The U.S. Supreme Court has the oppor­tu­ni­ty to put a stop to that bar­barous prac­tice, and should.

America’s inter­est in exe­cut­ing its most vul­ner­a­ble has waned con­sid­er­ably since the court rein­stat­ed the death penal­ty in 1976. A 2002 Gallup poll showed that 69 per­cent of adults in the United States oppose cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment for juve­niles. Of the 22 states that per­mit the death penal­ty for juve­niles, 15 have not car­ried out an exe­cu­tion in the past 28 years. Last year marked the fewest juve­nile exe­cu­tions in 15 years — only two.

The court’s deci­sion Monday to review the con­sti­tu­tion­al­i­ty of the death penal­ty for juve­niles comes in a Missouri case in which the state’s Supreme Court found the pun­ish­ment to be so lit­tle used now that it qual­i­fied as cru­el and unusu­al pun­ish­ment” under the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution. The Missouri court spared the life of Christopher Simmons, a con­vict­ed mur­der­er who hard­ly qual­i­fies as a poster boy for out­law­ing the death penal­ty. Prosecutors say Mr. Simmons, now 27, boast­ed that he could beat the case because he was a teen-ager.

But teens don’t pos­sess the matu­ri­ty or intel­lec­tu­al capac­i­ty to com­pre­hend the con­se­quences of their actions. Scientific stud­ies show that to be the case: Areas of the brain that con­trol impulse, rea­son­ing and judg­ment don’t ful­ly mature until our 20s.

If a mea­sure of a soci­ety is how it choos­es to pun­ish its most incor­ri­gi­ble and for whom it reserves its most hor­ri­fy­ing pun­ish­ment, then this coun­try has failed.

The Supreme Court will be look­ing at whether a con­sen­sus exists in the coun­try now to nar­row use of the death penal­ty once again. Since 1989, when the court found no such con­sen­sus on exe­cut­ing offend­ers who com­mit­ted their crimes as juve­niles, five states have joined the 12 that set a min­i­mum age of 18 for exe­cu­tion. A Virginia jury’s deci­sion to spare teen-age mur­der­er Lee Boyd Malvo the death penal­ty also sug­gests an atti­tude shift. Federal pros­e­cu­tors want­ed Mr. Malvo tried there first because of Virginia’s uncom­pro­mis­ing use of the death penalty.

When the Supreme Court takes up the Missouri case in the fall, it will do so with at least four jus­tices already on record oppos­ing the death penal­ty for juve­niles. Fifteen years ago, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor not­ed that the day may come” when the pre­vail­ing view is against exe­cut­ing offend­ers who com­mit­ted their crimes as 16- and 17-year-olds. The day is here.

Sources

Baltimore Sun