The Virginian Pilot

July 242004

Editorial

A broad swath of human­i­tar­i­an, reli­gious, med­ical, legal and gov­ern­men­tal groups recent­ly urged the U.S. Supreme Court to reject the death penal­ty for indi­vid­u­als whose crimes occurred before they turned 18.

The five Supreme Court jus­tices who dis­agreed in 2002, when the high court last weighed the mat­ter, should con­sid­er care­ful­ly the evi­dence that stan­dards of decen­cy have evolved.

No one dis­putes that Christopher Simmons, a Missouri inmate whose appeal will be heard this fall, act­ed cru­el­ly in 1993 when he pushed Shirley Crook off a rail­road tran­som to her death. Simmons was 17 at the time.

But there is mount­ing belief, par­tial­ly based on med­ical evi­dence, that youths do not qual­i­fy for soci­ety’s harsh­est pun­ish­ment. That sen­tence should be reserved for indi­vid­u­als whose brains have ful­ly devel­oped.

Simmons’ death penal­ty was imposed under a 1989 Supreme Court deci­sion allow­ing the exe­cu­tion of 16- and 17-year-olds. Last August, the Missouri Supreme Court over­turned that sen­tence, argu­ing that it vio­lates the pro­hi­bi­tion against cru­el and unusu­al pun­ish­ment.

The state of Missouri appealed and legal offi­cials in sev­er­al states, includ­ing Virginia, joined the appeal to pre­serve their author­i­ty to put juve­niles to death.

As the numer­ous oppos­ing briefs attest, the Missouri and Virginia view is increas­ing­ly iso­lat­ed from nation­al and inter­na­tion­al sen­ti­ment. Among the fil­ers are 17 Nobel Peace prize win­ners, four dozen nations, 28 U.S. reli­gious groups, nine for­mer diplo­mats and a host of pro­fes­sion­al orga­ni­za­tions.

The world­wide com­mu­ni­ty has long reject­ed juve­nile exe­cu­tions. According to the briefs, only five coun­tries — China, Iran, Pakistan, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and the United States exe­cut­ed juve­nile offend­ers in the past four years.

Among sev­en states that have car­ried out such exe­cu­tions, Texas leads with 13; Virginia is sec­ond with three. In con­trast, the U.S. mil­i­tary, the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment and 31 states bar the prac­tice.

What has long been a moral and legal issue has become a med­ical one, as well.

Scientists once con­sid­ered brains ful­ly devel­oped by age 12 or so. Complex imag­ing stud­ies, con­duct­ed recent­ly at major med­ical facil­i­ties, prove oth­er­wise.

Intense brain changes extend into late ado­les­cence and even beyond. Areas involv­ing impulse con­trol, aggres­sion and deci­sion-mak­ing are among those in flux.

As they did in rul­ing against exe­cu­tion of the men­tal­ly retard­ed two years ago, the jus­tices will gauge the Simmons case in light of com­mu­ni­ty stan­dards. A Chesapeake jury last year offered sub­stan­tial evi­dence of change in award­ing a life sen­tence, not death, to con­vict­ed sniper Lee Boyd Malvo.

The time has come for the nation as a whole to join a humane cho­rus of oppo­si­tion to the exe­cu­tion of juvenile killers.

Sources

The Virginian-Pilot