Daytona Beach News-Journal

April 292004

Editorial

Florida does­n’t exe­cute chil­dren any­more. It has­n’t in 50 years, but noth­ing in the law says it can’t. Currently the law allows Florida juries to sen­tence 16-year-olds to death. Three inmates cur­rent­ly on Florida’s death row were 17 when the mur­ders were com­mit­ted for which they’re con­demned. On Tuesday, the state Senate decid­ed it can no longer coun­te­nance the statute’s duplic­i­ty, rea­son­ing that oth­er Florida laws rec­og­nize peo­ple under age 18 as chil­dren. Victor Crist, the Tampa Republican who spon­sored SB 224, is gen­er­al­ly a hard-lin­er for the death penal­ty. But he said the state judges chil­dren unfair­ly when it assumes only in crim­i­nal cas­es that they have an adult’s matu­ri­ty to dis­cern right from wrong. The bill would set the min­i­mum age for exe­cu­tion at 18, remov­ing Florida from the bar­barous ranks of 20 states that sanc­tion the death penal­ty for juve­niles. Florida would be the third state in two years to do so.

Doubtless Crist and oth­er right-wing leg­is­la­tors sup­port­ing the bill are also moti­vat­ed by anoth­er less altru­is­tic con­cern. The U.S. Supreme Court will soon review a Missouri Supreme Court rul­ing that exe­cut­ing youths offends the Constitution’s pro­hi­bi­tion against cru­el and unusu­al pun­ish­ment. Because the high court end­ed the exe­cu­tion of men­tal­ly retard­ed inmates in a deci­sion two years ago, observers think the court will be sim­i­lar­ly inclined to uphold the Missouri opin­ion. Florida leg­is­la­tors are obvi­ous­ly attempt­ing to pre-empt an attack on this state’s death penal­ty law by remov­ing the poten­tial­ly objec­tion­able pro­vi­sion for juve­nile exe­cu­tion.

But the ques­tion remain­ing this week is whether House Speaker Johnnie Byrd will allow a vote on the mea­sure in the low­er cham­ber. Legislation to the same effect was intro­duced in each of the past five years but got no trac­tion in the more con­ser­v­a­tive House. Byrd remains strong­ly opposed. However, the com­pan­ion bill to SB 224 recent­ly received a unan­i­mous favor­able vote in the House Public Safety and Crime Prevention Committee. Byrd said ear­ly this week he may let mem­bers vote their con­science” on it. That he should do, and with pri­or­i­ty, regard­less of the under­ly­ing moti­va­tions of death penal­ty advo­cates.

Of the 20 states that allow the exe­cu­tion of peo­ple who com­mit­ted cap­i­tal crimes when they were under 18, sev­en have car­ried out juve­nile exe­cu­tions since the death penal­ty was rein­stat­ed by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1973. Of the near­ly two dozen exe­cu­tions, half were in Texas. Seventy-three juve­niles remain on the nation’s death rows. In the 1980s, the high court itself abol­ished the death penal­ty for any­one 15 or younger.

Most indus­tri­al­ized nations have abol­ished the death penal­ty alto­geth­er, and that leaves the United States in mis­er­able com­pa­ny. But this nation stands alone in the world in its con­tin­ued sanc­tion of juve­nile exe­cu­tion.

Florida at least could join the ranks of the civ­i­lized world by abol­ish­ing the death penal­ty for offend­ers under 18. Byrd should call the vote on HB 63.

Sources

Daytona Beach News-Journal