Articles

The Honolulu Advertiser October 18, 2004 Editorial During the presidential debates, President Bush suggested his ideal of a Supreme Court justice would be one who does not legislate but simply interprets the Constitution according to how it was written. The full flower of this thinking is the judge who is a “strict constructionist,” taking the Constitution at its word. Yet even the most conservative judge is affected by, and takes into account, the changing political, social and scientific…

News and Record October 18, 2004 Editorial The U.S. Supreme Court has heard arguments in a Missouri case that will decide whether inmates on America’s death rows can be executed if they committed murder at age 16 or 17. The court already forbids the execution of people younger than 15. The court’s decision affects five North Carolina prisoners, all of whom are adults now but who were 17 when they committed murders. N.C. law forbids the execution of 16-year-olds. Yet it permits the execution…

San Diego Union-Tribune October 18, 2004 Editorial Juveniles sometimes commit horrific crimes, some unimaginable even for adults. But all nations of the world except two — the United States and Somalia — refuse to put youthful offenders to death. Even Iran and Congo have repudiated the practice in recent years. Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in a Missouri case that may lead to the banning of executions in this country for those who commit such crimes before they turn…

Dallas Morning News October 17, 2004 Editorial Society rightly holds children and adults to different standards. For example, it forbids children to vote, to smoke and to drink alcohol because it intuitively reasons that they aren’t mature enough. Now society can prove that children are less mature than adults. According to scientific evidence compiled by the American Medical Association, some regions of the brain, specifically those associated with impulse control, regulation of emotions…

Detroit Free Press October 16, 2004 Even death penalty supporters ought to hope that the U.S. Supreme Court ends the barbaric practice of executing murderers who killed when they were 16 or 17. The United States is virtually alone in permitting the execution of minors. Only six other nations have allowed it since 1990, and those countries, including Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and China, have practically abandoned using it. Justices have already acknowledged that maturity and mental…

The (Louisville, KY) Courier-Journal October 16, 2004 Editorial Soon, Americans over the age of 18 will go to the polls. No one under 18 may vote. They aren’t considered mature enough. In fact, juveniles aren’t considered mature enough to drink or to smoke, to marry or to sign contracts. They’re not allowed to sit on juries, to make medical decisions — or even go to movies with “mature” content. But, in many states, including Kentucky, 16- and 17-year-olds are held as accountable as adults…

The (Albany, NY) Times Union October 16, 2004 Editorial The U.S. Supreme Court agrees to decide if juveniles should face capital punishment At long last, the U.S. Supreme Court is revisiting an issue it has avoided since 1988: whether the death penalty should be imposed on juveniles who commit capital crimes. The court last had a chance to address the question in 2003, but chose to pass and let the states puzzle it themselves. This time the justices should come down with a clear ruling that…

Springfield (Missouri) News Leader October 16, 2004 Editorial Christopher Simmons committed a horrible crime when he was 17. Simmons and an accomplice broke into a woman’s home, robbed her, tied her and threw her into the Meramec River. He should be punished by spending the rest of his life in prison. His punishment should not be the death penalty — the sentence Simmons is facing. Earlier this week, the Supreme Court heard Simmons’ appeal. His lawyer argued, in part, that a previous…

The (Staunton, VA) News Leader October 15, 2004 Editorial One of the most important things the U.S. Supreme Court will do during this year’s session will be whether the justices rule that imposing the death penalty for crimes committed by a person under the age of 18 violates the Constitution’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment. We hope they decide it does — and we are not alone. Before the usual suspects begin picking up their stones chiseled with the letter “L,” we would remind them…

St. Louis Post-Dispatch October 14, 2004 Editorial The U.S. Supreme Court may be on the verge of joining the rest of the civilized world in banning the execution of juveniles. Justice Sandra Day O’Connor made just one remark during Wednesday’s hour-long argument over whether to execute Christopher Simmons, who was 17 when he murdered Shirley Crook of Fenton, Mo. Justice O’Connor said there was “about the same consensus” against the juvenile death penalty today as there had been against…