- In April 2001, Governor Huckabee signed a law providing for Defense Counsel Standards and DNA testing.
Arkansas Legislation Prior to 2007
News Brief — Arkansas Capital Defendant Gets Third Trial Following Mistrial After Second Conviction
NEWS (3/21/20): Arkansas — Arkansas capital defendant Mauricio Torres will get a third trial in the child-abuse murder of his six-year-old son after a Benton County trial judge declared a mistrial during the penalty-phase of his second trial and vacated the jury’s conviction.
Judge Brad Karren declared a mistrial on March 5 after prosecution witness Quinten Martin, Torres’s step-son, attempted to attack Torres in the jury’s presence. The defense argued that Arkansas law required an initial death sentence to be imposed by the same jury that rendered the guilt verdict. On March 21, Judge Karren ruled in the defense’s favor, agreeing that a new jury could not be empaneled for sentencing without first considering Torres’s guilt or innocence.
Torres was first convicted and sentenced to death in November 2016. However, the Arkansas Supreme Court overturned that conviction because prosecutors had improperly charged Torres with an alleged rape that had taken place entirely in Missouri and could not be tried in Arkansas.
News Brief — Arkansas Permits Death-Sentenced Man Lawyers Say is Intellectually Disabled to Waive Post-Conviction Appeals
NEWS (3/12/20): The Arkansas Supreme Court ruled on March 12, 2020 that death-row prisoner Jerry Lard, who lawyers say is intellectually disabled, may waive his post-conviction appeals.
Lard’s initial post-conviction lawyer was permitted to withdraw from the case citing “irreparable harm” to the attorney-client relationship after he had presented evidence that Lard was intellectually disabled. The court appointed new counsel to represent Lard, who then asked the trial court to withdraw his appeals. The trial court granted the motion to waive the appeals and the appeals court affirmed that ruling.
However, the court noted that a person who has intellectual disability may not be executed, but declined to rule on Lard’s intellectual disability claim, saying it is not ripe in the absence of an execution date.
Read the Arkansas Supreme Court’s decision in Lard v. State, 2020 Ark. 110 (Mar. 12, 2020).
Arkansas
Apr 27, 2022
Arkansas Marks Five Years Since End of 2017 Execution Spree
News Brief — Arkansas Capital Defendant Gets Third Trial Following Mistrial After Second Conviction
NEWS (3/21/20): Arkansas — Arkansas capital defendant Mauricio Torres will get a third trial in the child-abuse murder of his six-year-old son after a Benton County trial judge declared a mistrial during the penalty-phase of his second trial and vacated the jury’s conviction.
Judge Brad Karren declared a mistrial on March 5 after prosecution witness Quinten Martin, Torres’s step-son, attempted to attack Torres in the jury’s presence. The defense argued that Arkansas law required an initial death sentence to be imposed by the same jury that rendered the guilt verdict. On March 21, Judge Karren ruled in the defense’s favor, agreeing that a new jury could not be empaneled for sentencing without first considering Torres’s guilt or innocence.
Torres was first convicted and sentenced to death in November 2016. However, the Arkansas Supreme Court overturned that conviction because prosecutors had improperly charged Torres with an alleged rape that had taken place entirely in Missouri and could not be tried in Arkansas.
Arkansas
May 08, 2019
Federal Court Hears Two Weeks of Testimony in Arkansas Lethal-Injection Challenge
Arkansas
Apr 19, 2019
Veil of Execution Secrecy Expands in Several Southern Death-Penalty States
News Brief — Arkansas Permits Death-Sentenced Man Lawyers Say is Intellectually Disabled to Waive Post-Conviction Appeals
NEWS (3/12/20): The Arkansas Supreme Court ruled on March 12, 2020 that death-row prisoner Jerry Lard, who lawyers say is intellectually disabled, may waive his post-conviction appeals.
Lard’s initial post-conviction lawyer was permitted to withdraw from the case citing “irreparable harm” to the attorney-client relationship after he had presented evidence that Lard was intellectually disabled. The court appointed new counsel to represent Lard, who then asked the trial court to withdraw his appeals. The trial court granted the motion to waive the appeals and the appeals court affirmed that ruling.
However, the court noted that a person who has intellectual disability may not be executed, but declined to rule on Lard’s intellectual disability claim, saying it is not ripe in the absence of an execution date.
Read the Arkansas Supreme Court’s decision in Lard v. State, 2020 Ark. 110 (Mar. 12, 2020).
Arkansas
May 08, 2019
Federal Court Hears Two Weeks of Testimony in Arkansas Lethal-Injection Challenge
Arkansas
Apr 19, 2019
Veil of Execution Secrecy Expands in Several Southern Death-Penalty States
Arkansas
Apr 19, 2019