Capital Case Roundup — Death Penalty Court Decisions the Week of January 182021

NEWS (1/​22/​21) — Texas: The Kaufman County District Attorney’s office has con­ced­ed that Texas death-row pris­on­er Charles Brownlow is intel­lec­tu­al­ly dis­abled and can­not be resen­tenced to death. The coun­ty pros­e­cu­tors’ deci­sion comes after the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals reversed Brownlow’s death sen­tence, say­ing that the state courts had pre­vi­ous­ly reject­ed his claim of intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty using a def­i­n­i­tion of the dis­or­der that the U.S. Supreme Court lat­er struck down as unconstitutional.

Assistant District Attorney Marc Moffitt said a pros­e­cu­tion expert had reviewed the tri­al tran­scripts and the evi­dence relat­ing to Brownlow’s intel­lec­tu­al and adap­tive func­tion­ing. The expert, Moffitt said that Brownlow is intel­lec­tu­al­ly dis­abled” and that we would not pre­vail” if Brownlow’s claim was adju­di­cat­ed under clin­i­cal­ly accept­ed def­i­n­i­tions of intellectual disability.

A DPIC review of death-penal­ty cas­es over­turned because of a defen­dan­t’s intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty shows that a defen­dant who is intel­lec­tu­al­ly dis­abled is much more like­ly to be wrong­ful­ly sen­tenced to death if he is Black. More than 80% of the death-row pris­on­ers whose death sen­tences have been vacat­ed as a result of intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty (107 of 132, 81.1%) are per­sons of col­or. Two-thirds are African American (88, or 66.7%).


NEWS (1/​19/​21) — Federal: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit has grant­ed habeas cor­pus relief to fed­er­al death-row pris­on­er Kenneth Barrett, find­ing he was pro­vid­ed inef­fec­tive assis­tance of coun­sel in the penal­ty phase of his cap­i­tal tri­al for the killing of an Oklahoma state trooper.

The court reversed the judg­ment of an Oklahoma fed­er­al dis­trict court, which had deter­mined that Barrett’s appoint­ed coun­sel had unrea­son­ably failed to inves­ti­gate and present avail­able mit­i­gat­ing evi­dence of brain dam­age, men­tal ill­ness (bipo­lar dis­or­der and PTSD), and chron­ic child­hood trau­ma in the sen­tenc­ing phase but ruled that counsel’s fail­ures had not been prej­u­di­cial. Without rehear­ing any of the tes­ti­mo­ny tak­en by a fed­er­al mag­is­trate judge dur­ing the course of a sev­en-day hear­ing, the dis­trict court had reject­ed the magistrate’s find­ings regard­ing prej­u­dice, assert­ing that the jury would not have been impressed by [Mr. Barrett’s] experts’ opinions.” 

The appeals court dis­agreed. It held that Barrett’s unpre­sent­ed mit­i­gat­ing evi­dence would have weak­ened the prosecution’s case in aggra­va­tion and, giv­en the min­i­mal mit­i­gat­ing evi­dence pre­sent­ed at tri­al, sub­stan­tial­ly strength­ened Barrett’s case for life. The appeals pan­el found that if defense coun­sel had pre­sent­ed the evi­dence of Mr. Barrett’s men­tal impair­ments and child­hood abuse at sen­tenc­ing, there is a rea­son­able prob­a­bil­i­ty that at least one juror would have con­clud­ed that the bal­ance of aggra­vat­ing and mit­i­gat­ing cir­cum­stances did not warrant death.”

Sources

L.P Phillips, Brownlow sen­tence com­mut­ed to life with­out parole, Newsradio 1080 KRLD, Dallas, January 22, 2021; Nomaan Merchant, Death Sentence Overturned for Texas Man Accused of Killing 5, Associated Press, February 122020.