Capital Case Roundup — Death Penalty Court Decisions the Week of June 72021

NEWS (6/​9/​21) — Nebraska: A pan­el of three judges has sen­tenced Aubrey Trail to death for the 2017 killing of Sydney Loofe. In a state­ment to the court before the pan­el pro­nounced sen­tence, Trail admit­ted to the killing but said that his co-defen­dant, Bailey Boswell, who faces cap­i­tal sen­tenc­ing hear­ing lat­er this month, was not involved in the killing. Trail is the 12th per­son on Nebraska’s death row.

Trail’s death sen­tence con­tin­ues a trend in which new death sen­tences are dis­pro­por­tion­al­ly imposed in non-jury pro­ceed­ings or in cas­es in which defen­dants are per­mit­ted to waive key tri­al rights or have asked to be exe­cut­ed. Three of the eigh­teen peo­ple sen­tenced to death in 2020 waived their rights to a jury tri­al and a fourth rep­re­sent­ed him­self from arrest through tri­al. In 2019, three of the 22 defen­dants sen­tenced to death waived their rights to jury sen­tenc­ing, two oth­ers were sen­tenced to death by Alabama judges after non-unan­i­mous votes by sen­tenc­ing juries, and four more waived their rights to coun­sel and/​or to present mitigating evidence.

Of the four death sen­tences DPIC has ver­i­fied so far in 2021, Trail had no penal­ty jury, Michael Powell was sen­tenced to death by an Alabama judge after a non-unan­i­mous jury vote at sen­tenc­ing and William Wells plead­ed guilty in Florida and has repeat­ed­ly said that he wants to die.


NEWS (6/​4/​21) — Texas: A Bexar County judge has resen­tenced for­mer Texas death-row pris­on­er Noah Espada to life impris­on­ment, near­ly six years after a Texas appeals court over­turned his death sen­tence because of per­jured tes­ti­mo­ny by a pros­e­cu­tion wit­ness in the penal­ty phase of Espada’s trial.

Espada was sen­tenced to death in 2005 based in large part on the tes­ti­mo­ny of a for­mer sheriff’s deputy, Christopher Nieto, that Espada would pose a future dan­ger in pris­on­er if sen­tenced to life. Nieto lied to the jury about the rea­sons he had left his job in the sheriff’s office, false­ly claimed that Espada had drugs in his cell, and false­ly told the jury that Espada had, with­out provo­ca­tion, attacked anoth­er pris­on­er. In a post-con­vic­tion hear­ing in 2012, Espada pre­sent­ed evi­dence that, less than a month before writ­ing up Espada for alleged dis­ci­pli­nary offens­es, Nieto had been sus­pend­ed for leav­ing his post and threat­en­ing Espada, that Nieto had been under inves­ti­ga­tion for smug­gling drugs into the prison, and that Nieto had resigned from the sheriff’s office rather than take a poly­graph test about his drug activ­i­ties. Espada also pre­sent­ed evi­dence that he had not attacked any­one, but that Nieto had actu­al­ly arranged for anoth­er pris­on­er to attack Espada.

On July 1, 2015, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals over­turned Espada’s death sen­tence based upon Nieto’s per­jured tes­ti­mo­ny. After sev­er­al years of unsuc­cess­ful lit­i­ga­tion by Espada to bar pros­e­cu­tors from argu­ing that he would pose a risk of future dan­ger­ous­ness, the par­ties agreed to a deal in which Espada could become eli­gi­ble for parole at age 71 in 2055.