Capital Case Roundup — Death Penalty Court Decisions the Week of October 122020

NEWS (10/​16/​20) — Texas: A divid­ed Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (TCCA) has upheld Kousol Chanthakoummane’s con­vic­tion and death sen­tence, which he argued had been obtained with junk bite mark tes­ti­mo­ny, hyp­no­tized wit­ness­es, and ques­tion­able DNA testimony. 

Chanthakoummane pre­sent­ed expert tes­ti­mo­ny in state post-con­vic­tion pro­ceed­ings that the hyp­not­i­cal­ly refreshed tes­ti­mo­ny against him was unre­li­able, that bite-mark iden­ti­fi­ca­tion tes­ti­mo­ny has no sci­en­tif­ic valid­i­ty, and the pros­e­cu­tion tes­ti­mo­ny on DNA relied on erro­neous data in the FBI DNA data­base and flawed sta­tis­ti­cal method­ol­o­gy. The tri­al court reject­ed his claims, sign­ing the pro­posed factfind­ing sub­mit­ted by Collin County prosecutors. 

The TCCA ruled that, although Chanthakoummane had shown that the state’s DNA tes­ti­mo­ny was incor­rect, prop­er DNA analy­sis would still have point­ed to him as hav­ing been present at the crime scene and the con­trib­u­tor of DNA found under the victim’s fin­ger­nails. It agreed that bite-mark iden­ti­fi­ca­tion tes­ti­mo­ny has been sci­en­tif­i­cal­ly dis­cred­it­ed and could not be offered today but said the tes­ti­mo­ny was harm­less giv­en the remain­ing DNA evi­dence. And the court reject­ed Chanthakoummane’s chal­lenge to the use of hyp­not­i­cal­ly refreshed tes­ti­mo­ny, say­ing that evi­dence that the flaws in hyp­not­i­cal­ly refreshed tes­ti­mo­ny were known at the time of tri­al and should have been raised at that time. Three dis­sent­ing judges would have agreed to review the con­sti­tu­tion­al­i­ty of the prosecution’s use of the hyp­not­i­cal­ly refreshed testimony.


NEWS (10/​16/​20) — Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has quashed the appeals of three more Philadelphia death-row pris­on­ers whose appel­late rights had been restored as a result of the con­flict of inter­est of a jus­tice who sat on their appeals after autho­riz­ing their cap­i­tal pros­e­cu­tion when he was district attorney.

In 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Williams v. Pennsylvania that for­mer Pennsylvania Chief Justice Ronald Castille’s par­tic­i­pa­tion in decid­ing an appeal brought by a pris­on­er whose cap­i­tal pros­e­cu­tion Castille had per­son­al­ly autho­rized vio­lat­ed due process. Earlier this year, how­ev­er, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled 4 – 3 in Commonwealth v. Reid that the defen­dants in the more than 40 oth­er Philadelphia death-penal­ty cas­es in which Castille had the imper­mis­si­ble dual role should have raised the con­flict of inter­est issue as soon as they knew about the con­flict. Applying that case prece­dent, the court ruled that peti­tions for con­flict-free appeals filed by Henry Daniels, Anthony Reid, and Craig Murphy, who filed their chal­lenges after Williams was decid­ed, were untimely.


NEWS (10/​14/​20) — California: The California Supreme Court has ordered a San Matteo County tri­al court to con­duct a hear­ing on whether Scott Peterson’s con­vic­tion for cap­i­tal mur­der should be over­turned. The court, which pre­vi­ous­ly over­turned Peterson’s death sen­tence as a result of the tri­al court’s improp­er removal of jurors for sim­ply express­ing per­son­al oppo­si­tion to the death penal­ty, direct­ed the tri­al court to deter­mine whether a juror had com­mit­ted mis­con­duct by not dis­clos­ing that she had been involved in oth­er legal pro­ceed­ings, includ­ing being the vic­tim of threats by her boyfriend’s ex-girl­friend that had caused her to fear for the life of her unborn child. The Peterson case involved the high­ly sen­sa­tion­al dis­ap­pear­ance and mur­der of Peterson’s preg­nant wife and the result­ing death of her unborn child.


NEWS (10/​6/​20) — Indiana: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has vacat­ed the stay of exe­cu­tion pre­vi­ous­ly issued by a dis­trict court to per­mit fed­er­al death-row pris­on­er Alfred Bourgeois to lit­i­gate his claim that he is inel­i­gi­ble for exe­cu­tion because of intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty. Bourgeois had been one of the five ini­tial death-row pris­on­ers sched­uled for exe­cu­tion in December 2019 — January 2020.

The Seventh Circuit ruled that Bourgeois was not enti­tled to review of his intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty claim because he had pre­vi­ous­ly raised and lost the issue in the Texas fed­er­al courts. At that time, how­ev­er, the courts had reject­ed Bourgeois’ claim based upon fac­tors the U.S. Supreme Court lat­er declared in Moore v. Texas were uncon­sti­tu­tion­al con­sid­er­a­tions. Bourgeois is expect­ed to appeal the Seventh Circuit’s decision.


DEATH PENALTY TRIAL DEVELOPMENTS — Very few pros­e­cu­tors have pur­sued cap­i­tal tri­als since courts first began to close to pre­vent fur­ther spread of the coro­n­avirus. However, Arkansas pros­e­cu­tors moved for­ward with the tri­al of Tacori Mackrell, an African-American defen­dant who was 18 years old when he killed a 72-year-old white woman. The all-white jury con­vict­ed Mackrell of cap­i­tal mur­der but, after 2½ hours of sen­tenc­ing delib­er­a­tions on October 16, returned a ver­dict of life in prison without parole.


On October 13, a Nebraska jury con­vict­ed Bailey Boswell of con­spir­a­cy and first-degree mur­der in the death of a woman she and her co-defen­dant Aubrey Trail were accused of lur­ing to their apart­ment through an on-line dat­ing app. Under Nebraska law, her sen­tence will be deter­mined by a three-judge pan­el after a sep­a­rate sentencing hearing.

Trail was con­vict­ed in July 2019. His sen­tenc­ing hear­ing has been delayed to December 2020 as a result of the COVID-19 pan­dem­ic. If Boswell is sen­tenced to death, she will be the first woman ever sen­tenced to death in Nebraska.


After delays relat­ed to the coro­n­avirus and to eval­u­ate the men­tal com­pe­ten­cy of Marlin Joseph, Palm Beach County, Florida Circuit Judge Cheryl Caracuzzo heard tes­ti­mo­ny on October 16 in the judi­cial phase of Joseph’s cap­i­tal sen­tenc­ing tri­al. In February, the jury in Joseph’s case rec­om­mend­ed that he be sen­tenced to death for the mur­der of a moth­er and her 11-year-old daugh­ter. Under Florida law, fol­low­ing a jury rec­om­men­da­tion of death, the court is required to con­duct a sep­a­rate sen­tenc­ing pro­ceed­ing, after which it deter­mines whether to accept the jury’s rec­om­men­da­tion or impose a sen­tence of life with­out parole. No one has been sen­tenced to death in Palm Beach County since 2002.


NEWS (10/​17/​20) — Washington D.C.: The fed­er­al gov­ern­ment has sched­uled the exe­cu­tions of Lisa Montgomery and Brandon Bernard. Montgomery would be the first woman exe­cut­ed by the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment in 67 years, and Bernard would be the youngest per­son exe­cut­ed by the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment in 68 years.