High Cost of the Death Penalty in Kansas 

With sev­en months remain­ing in the fis­cal year, the Kansas fund to help pay the cost of defend­ing sus­pects in cap­i­tal mur­der cas­es is near­ly out of mon­ey. The state has spent near­ly $2 mil­lion dol­lars on three cap­i­tal cas­es, includ­ing $771,240 defend­ing John E. Robinson, Sr., and $1,135,973 defend­ing broth­ers Reginald and Jonathan Carr. The Kansas Board of Indigents Defense Services has not­ed that the fund will be out of mon­ey in December and has request­ed an emer­gency allo­ca­tion of $600,000 from the state’s bud­get office. We have a stack of bills we can­not pay,” said Patricia Scalia, exec­u­tive direc­tor of the board. (Associated Press, November 232002)

Illinois Short of Death Penalty Funds 

Illinois’s Capital Litigation Trust Fund, cre­at­ed by Governor George Ryan in 1999 to help ensure com­pe­tent han­dling of death penal­ty cas­es, ran out of mon­ey to pay defense lawyers in 2001. This fis­cal short­age left coun­ties through­out the state strug­gling to meet the high cost of death penal­ty cas­es. The Trust Fund mon­ey pro­vides resources for neces­si­ties such as DNA test­ing, men­tal and phys­i­cal eval­u­a­tions, and inves­ti­ga­tors. The state Appellate Defender’s Office not­ed that the unpaid bills could jeop­ar­dize cas­es and lead to attor­neys refus­ing work on cap­i­tal cas­es. (The Munster Times, August 192002)

Citing High Costs, Ohio Judge Hesitates on Death Penalty 

Vinton County, Ohio, Judge Jeffrey L. Simmons ruled that pros­e­cu­tors could not seek the death penal­ty against Gregory McKnight. Simmons’ rul­ing stat­ed that the coun­ty could not guar­an­tee that McKnight would receive an ade­quate defense in his cap­i­tal tri­al. The court finds that the poten­tial impact of finan­cial con­sid­er­a­tions could com­pro­mise the defen­dan­t’s due process rights in a cap­i­tal mur­der case,” said Simmons. The court finds that this risk is unac­cept­able in this case.” The cost of a death penal­ty tri­al for McKnight was expect­ed to exceed $75,000 for legal fees, inves­ti­ga­tors, and wit­ness trav­el. After being upheld by an appeals court, the judge recent­ly decid­ed to allow the pros­e­cu­tion to seek the death penal­ty. (New York Times, Aug. 25, 2002, and The Columbus Dispatch, August 92002)

Georgia Judge Notes Expensive Bottom Line in Capital Cases 

A recent death penal­ty case in Georgia has led Fulton County Superior Court Judge Stephanie Manis to ques­tion the val­ue of expen­sive cap­i­tal tri­als. The death penal­ty has great pop­u­lar appeal, but I don’t think the tax­pay­ers have looked at the bot­tom line,” she said. The death penal­ty is damn expen­sive.” Expenses for the cap­i­tal tri­al of Jamil Abdullah Al-Amin, who received a sen­tence of life with­out the pos­si­bil­i­ty of parole, includ­ed the following:

  • The District Attorney ded­i­cat­ed four pros­e­cu­tors and a full-time inves­ti­ga­tor to the case dur­ing the tri­al and in the months lead­ing up to it. Not includ­ing time spent prepar­ing for the case, the pros­e­cu­tor’s salaries exceed­ed $74,000 for the two months of tri­al and jury selection. 
  • The District Attorney’s Office spent approx­i­mate­ly $34,000 for equip­ment, graph­ic design for court exhibits, and expert tes­ti­mo­ny. An addi­tion­al $43,000 was spent on over­time for investigators. 
  • $164,000 in fees and expens­es were spent for one of the defense attor­neys. Two addi­tion­al lawyers have yet to sub­mit bills and these addi­tion­al charges are expect­ed to put total legal fees well above $200,000.
  • It cost more than $87,000 to select and sequester the jury for this case. This amount includ­ed $63,600 for hotel rooms, din­ners and drinks for jurors; $6,000 for juror lunch­es and bev­er­ages; $2,500 for juror trans­porta­tion; $765 for enter­tain­ment expens­es; and $14,300 to copy the ques­tion­naires used to pick the jury. This amount does not include the over­time paid to sher­if­f’s deputies who guard­ed the jury and the court. (Atlanta Journal-Constitution, May 122002)

The High Cost of New York’s Death Penalty 

A recent review con­duct­ed by the New York Law Journal found that the 1995 rein­state­ment of New York’s death penal­ty has cost the state mil­lions in tax­pay­er dol­lars and has con­sumed an immense amount of time of judges, pros­e­cu­tors, and defense attor­neys. The Journal’s findings include:

  • New York’s Division of Criminal Justice Services has reim­bursed more than $5 mil­lion to coun­ties that have pros­e­cut­ed capital cases. 
  • The state spends $1.2 mil­lion annu­al­ly to fund the New York Prosecutors Training Institute that pro­vides lawyers to assist dis­trict attor­neys on capital cases. 
  • The Brooklyn District Attorney’s office was reim­bursed $707,259 to cov­er the per­son­nel cost of one case, the pros­e­cu­tion of Darrel K. Harris. This total does not reflect non-per­son­nel expens­es, includ­ing expert fees and the work of Jonathan L. Frank, who served as the lead appel­late attor­ney for the pros­e­cu­tion. Frank esti­mates that he donat­ed more than 600 hours of time to the case. 
  • During the prepa­ra­tion of its 1,181-page brief for the Harris case, the Brooklyn District Attorney’s office was assist­ed by pros­e­cu­tors in 8 other counties. 
  • The defense team for Harris spent approx­i­mate­ly $1.7 mil­lion to mount his defense, and the state’s Capital Defender Office invest­ed $1.2 mil­lion into pro­duc­ing the team’s 779-page brief. 
  • The bud­get for the New York Court of Appeals has increased by more than $533,000 annu­al­ly to enable each of the Court’s 7 judges to have an addi­tion­al clerk for capital cases. 
  • While a non-cap­i­tal mur­der requires no more than two pros­e­cu­tors, death penal­ty cas­es require at least three or four. The Queens District Attorney’s Office esti­mates that seek­ing the death penal­ty trans­lates into 300% to 500% more work than for a non-cap­i­tal mur­der tri­al. In addi­tion to the funds required to try death penal­ty cas­es, the State Department of Correctional Services spent $1.3 mil­lion to con­struct New York’s death row for 12 inmates and it pays near­ly $300,000 per year to guard the unit. (New York Law Journal, April 302002)

Philadelphia District Attorney Questioned About Death Penalty Costs 

At a Philadelphia City Council bud­get hear­ing, coun­cil­man Michael Nutter ques­tioned District Attorney Lynne A. Abraham about the costs of the death penal­ty. Abraham not­ed that in 2001 there were 309 homi­cides in Philadelphia, pros­e­cu­tors filed ini­tial notice that they might pur­sue the death penal­ty in 144 cas­es; they sought the death penal­ty in 67 cas­es; and only 2 were sent to death row. Of the remain­ing cas­es, 44 peo­ple were sen­tenced to life in prison for first-degree mur­der, 12 were con­vict­ed of 2nd or 3rd-degree mur­der, and 9 were found not guilty. 

Given what some of these num­bers are, is the death sen­tence being over­ly applied for?” asked Nutter. Obviously, there’s a sig­nif­i­cant gap between the start of the process and the end. Is there over­charg­ing going on?” Abraham respond­ed: We don’t over­charge any­one, if we can avoid it .… We have the right to seek the death penal­ty in all appro­pri­ate cas­es, and that’s what we do.” With respect to the costs, Abraham respond­ed: We’re not inter­est­ed .… We have no inten­tion of purs­ing that exer­cise.” (Philadelphia Inquirer, March 152002)

The High Cost of the Death Penalty in Texas 

As a grow­ing num­ber of local gov­ern­ments are dis­cov­er­ing, there is often a new twist on an old say­ing: Nothing is cer­tain except the death penal­ty and high­er tax­es.… Just pros­e­cut­ing a cap­i­tal crime can cost an aver­age of $200,000 to $300,000, accord­ing to a con­ser­v­a­tive esti­mate by the Texas Office of Court Administration. Add indi­gent-defense lawyers, an almost-auto­mat­ic appeal and a tri­al tran­script, and death-penal­ty cas­es can eas­i­ly cost many times that amount.… The cost, coun­ty offi­cials say, can be an unex­pect­ed and severe bud­getary shock — much like a nat­ur­al dis­as­ter, but with­out any fed­er­al relief to ease the strain. To pay up, coun­ties must raise tax­es, cut ser­vices, or both.” (Wall Street Journal, January 92002)