Death Penalty News and Developments for November 25 — December 12019

NEWS — November 29: The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has affirmed a fed­er­al dis­trict court rul­ing grant­i­ng Arizona death-row pris­on­er Barry Lee Jones a new tri­al based on his tri­al lawyer’s fail­ure to inves­ti­gate and present evi­dence that he is inno­cent. Jones had been con­vict­ed of sex­u­al assault, three counts of
child abuse, and felony mur­der in con­nec­tion with the death of a four-year-old girl, Rachel Gold. The court found that, as a result of Jones’s tri­al lawyer’s inad­e­quate inves­ti­ga­tion, the jury nev­er heard evi­dence that Rachel’s injuries were sus­tained at a time in which Jones could not have caused them.


NEWS — November 27: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit has upheld the con­vic­tion and death sen­tence of Oklahoma death-row pris­on­er Nicholas Davis. The court affirmed the rul­ing of an Oklahoma fed­er­al dis­trict court that had denied Davis’s claim that his tri­al and appel­late coun­sel had pro­vid­ed inef­fec­tive rep­re­sen­ta­tion when they failed to ade­quate­ly inves­ti­gate his men­tal health and present mit­i­gat­ing evi­dence of Davis’s depres­sion and post-trau­mat­ic stress disorder.


NEWS — November 25: The U.S. District Court for the Central District of California has over­turned the con­vic­tion of death-row pris­on­er Anthony Oliver, find­ing that that Los Angeles pros­e­cu­tors had uncon­sti­tu­tion­al­ly exer­cised their dis­cre­tionary jury strikes on the basis of race to exclude African Americans from serv­ing on the jury. In grant­i­ng Oliver a new tri­al, the fed­er­al court ruled that the California Supreme Court had unrea­son­ably con­clud­ed that the pros­e­cu­tion’s jury strikes had not been racially based.

The same day the fed­er­al court decid­ed Oliver’s case, the California Supreme Court reject­ed claims that Sacramento pros­e­cu­tors had improp­er­ly exclud­ed African Americans from serv­ing as jurors in the death-penal­ty tri­als of Joe Johnson (left) and Robert Rhoades (right). Dissenting in Johnson’s case, Justice Liu wrote: This is yet anoth­er case in which a black man was sen­tenced to death for killing a white vic­tim after a jury selec­tion process in which the pros­e­cu­tion dis­pro­por­tion­ate­ly excused black prospec­tive jurors. And this is yet anoth­er case in which this court has refused to find any infer­ence of dis­crim­i­na­tion in jury selec­tion, despite a well-found­ed sus­pi­cion that the pros­e­cu­tor here, in eval­u­at­ing prospec­tive jurors, tar­get­ed only black jurors for crim­i­nal back­ground checks.” Justice Liu also dis­sent­ed in Rhoades’ case, not­ing that pros­e­cu­tors had exer­cised their dis­cre­tionary jury chal­lenges to strike all four black prospective jurors.


NEWS — November 22: The U.S. District Court for the Central District of California reversed the death sen­tence imposed on Mary Ellen Samuels, find­ing that her tri­al lawyer had pro­vid­ed inef­fec­tive rep­re­sen­ta­tion when he failed to object to the pros­e­cu­tion’s admis­sion of irrel­e­vant evi­dence of her drug use and involve­ment in drug sales and that she had posed for cheese­cake” pho­tos. The court said the evi­dence was not like­ly to have affect­ed the jury’s deter­mi­na­tion of guilt or inno­cence but had a rea­son­able prob­a­bil­i­ty of affect­ing its vote on life or death.