Published on Tuesday, December 28, 2004 by the Miami Herald by Bianca Jagger

Over the week­end, William Tommy” Zeigler, a life­long Christian who joined the Catholic Church ear­li­er this year, spent his 29th Christmas on Florida’s Death Row. Who can com­pre­hend the grief of hav­ing one’s wife and in-laws bru­tal­ly mur­dered in the fam­i­ly store on Christmas Eve? Who can imag­ine the trau­ma of being rushed to the hos­pi­tal with a near-fatal bul­let wound through the abdomen on the very same Christmas Eve? Or the agony of spend­ing the next 29 Christmases on Florida’s Death Row, wrong­ful­ly con­vict­ed for those murders.

That was Christmas for Zeigler, a white busi­ness­man wide­ly thought to be on Death Row because he helped defend Andrew James, a black man, against a group of cor­rupt white res­i­dents try­ing to shut down his legitimate business.

Zeigler arranged for a lawyer to defend James and appeared as his char­ac­ter wit­ness. Judge Maurice Paul appeared as the char­ac­ter wit­ness for Herbert G. Baker, the white man who brought the charges against James.

James was suc­cess­ful in the case and kept his busi­ness. A few months lat­er, on Christmas Eve, there was a mul­ti­ple mur­der at the Zeigler fam­i­ly fur­ni­ture store. Zeigler was charged with the mur­ders. Paul was the tri­al judge who presided over Zeigler’s fate.

Paul over­rode the jury’s rec­om­men­da­tion and sen­tenced Zeigler to death. Zeigler has main­tained his innocence.

Ironically, Edward Williams, the man who turned the prin­ci­pal mur­der weapon over to the police and had acquired the two oth­er mur­der weapons involved in the crime, became the state’s star wit­ness. He claimed to be an innocent bystander.

In the 1989 nation­al­ly syn­di­cat­ed tele­vi­sion pro­gram on the case, A Matter of Life and Death, tele­vi­sion jour­nal­ist Ike Pappas not­ed: Zeigler was attempt­ing to clean up cor­rup­tion right in his home­town of Winter Garden, Florida. He was help­ful in shut­ting down the old Edgewater Hotel, a cen­ter of pros­ti­tu­tion and drug deal­ing. But he was also try­ing to gath­er infor­ma­tion on oth­er ille­gal activ­i­ties such as gun run­ning and, most impor­tant­ly, loan sharking.

The loan sharks made a for­tune let­ting [black] migrant work­ers buy gro­ceries on cred­it at an inter­est rate of 520 per­cent per year. And Tommy Zeigler alleges that cer­tain mem­bers of the Winter Garden police force were in on the action.”

Now DNA evi­dence offers Zeigler the hope of a very dif­fer­ent future Christmas.

DNA evi­dence has played a sig­nif­i­cant role in 14 of the 117 exon­er­a­tions from U.S. Death Rows. Such evi­dence is vital, espe­cial­ly in Florida, which — accord­ing to the Death Penalty Information Center in Washington, D.C. — has had 21 peo­ple found inno­cent on its Death Row, more than any other state.

Lawson Lamar, the state attor­ney in Zeigler’s death-penal­ty case, fought for years to pre­vent DNA test­ing of the crime-scene blood. In August 2001, the court ordered the tests. The results, which were report­ed in June 2002, hope­less­ly dev­as­tate the state’s the­o­ry of Zeigler’s cul­pa­bil­i­ty. The results com­plete­ly sup­port Zeigler’s innocence.

On Dec. 20 and 21, Circuit Judge Reginald Whitehead heard the DNA evi­dence in Orlando. The lawyers for Zeigler asked Whitehead to grant Zeigler a new tri­al so that — for the first time — a jury could look at all the evi­dence of the case.

The state attor­neys argued against a new tri­al. The state seeks to exe­cute Zeigler with­out any jury ever see­ing the moun­tain of late­ly dis­cov­ered evi­dence of Ziegler’s innocence.

Whitehead now must decide whether to grant a new tri­al for Zeigler.

How can any­one resist a new tri­al in this case? There can be no doubt that if the infor­ma­tion now avail­able had been known in 1976, Zeigler would nev­er have been pros­e­cut­ed. One of the orig­i­nal jurors has even signed a sworn affi­davit that she would have vot­ed not guilty” if the new evi­dence had been avail­able at the trial.

The pur­pose of DNA test­ing in this case was to estab­lish whose blood was on the clothes of Charlie Mays and Zeigler to show who com­mit­ted the murders.

No jury has heard most of the evi­dence of Zeigler’s inno­cence: the DNA test results; the buried orig­i­nal police report, which con­tra­dicts the state’s case; the buried tape record­ing of the inves­ti­ga­tor from the state attor­ney’s office try­ing to induce poten­tial wit­ness­es to change their tes­ti­mo­ny; the gun­shot-residue tests, which estab­lish that Williams had no residue in the pock­et of the pants in which he claims to have car­ried the fresh­ly dis­charged mur­der weapon; or even the tes­ti­mo­ny of the Roaches and the Nolans, all cred­i­ble eye­wit­ness­es, that con­tra­dicts the state’s eye­wit­ness­es,” including Williams.

No jury has wres­tled with these questions:

• What was Oakland Chief of Police Robert Thompson doing in uni­form out­side his juris­dic­tion, sit­ting at a restau­rant across the street from the killings while Zeigler was being shot?

• Why did Thompson write the orig­i­nal police report, allow it to be buried by the state attor­ney and then tes­ti­fy under oath to facts incon­sis­tent with his own buried police report?

• Why are Thompson, Mays, Williams and Felton Thomas (the state’s oth­er star wit­ness) all con­nect­ed through the city of Oakland and its migrant camps, the very place where ille­gal prac­tices that preyed upon black migrant farm­work­ers were being attacked by Zeigler?

The DNA evi­dence and the oth­er post-tri­al evi­dence of Zeigler’s inno­cence are absolute­ly clear. Zeigler was wrong­ful­ly pros­e­cut­ed, wrong­ful­ly con­vict­ed and wrong­ful­ly sen­tenced to death.

After Zeigler’s 29 Christmases on Death Row, it is high time to cor­rect this hor­ren­dous error. Zeigler’s case demands a new trial.

Bianca Jagger is a human-rights activist.

© 2004 Miami Herald

For a book on the Zeigler case, Fatal Flaw: A True Story of Malice and Murder in a Small Southern Town, by Phillip Finch, click here