Guantánamo Bay

Six detainees charged with cap­i­tal crimes are cur­rent­ly being held at the U.S. Naval Base mil­i­tary prison in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. Much of the infor­ma­tion relat­ing to these cas­es is clas­si­fied and all the par­tic­i­pants in the cas­es — pros­e­cu­tors, defense lawyers, and court per­son­nel — are required to have top secret secu­ri­ty clear­ance. As a result, sig­nif­i­cant por­tions of the pro­ceed­ings — includ­ing court motions and deci­sions — are heav­i­ly redact­ed or kept secret from the pub­lic. In addi­tion, the cas­es involve high­ly clas­si­fied infor­ma­tion about the use of tor­ture to extract con­fes­sions and obtain infor­ma­tion. In 2014, the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence declas­si­fied some of the infor­ma­tion relat­ing to the inter­ro­ga­tion tech­niques used by the CIA against detainees. The Committee’s report—which has come to be known as known as The Torture Report” — details the use of phys­i­cal, psy­cho­log­i­cal, and sex­u­al tor­ture tech­niques dur­ing cus­tody and in inter­ro­ga­tions. The use of these tech­niques has led to legal chal­lenges brought by defense attor­neys, both with respect to the use of evi­dence obtained through tor­ture and to the legit­i­ma­cy of the mil­i­tary commissions themselves.

In 2017, Abd al Rahim al Nashiri filed a peti­tion for writ of cer­tio­rari in the U.S. Supreme Court ask­ing it to review the legal­i­ty of the mil­i­tary com­mis­sions and the mil­i­tary’s author­i­ty to even try his case. On October 16, 2017, the Supreme Court denied the peti­tion, declin­ing to review the issue.

Below is the list of the pris­on­ers housed at Guantánamo Bay who we know are fac­ing cap­i­tal pros­e­cu­tion by the Department of Defense through mil­i­tary com­mis­sion — a spe­cif­ic type of tri­al pro­ceed­ing used by the mil­i­tary when pros­e­cut­ing indi­vid­u­als charged with war-relat­ed crimes. (For more infor­ma­tion on mil­i­tary com­mis­sions, see A look at the Guantanamo mil­i­tary com­mis­sion, Associated Press, May 12, 2012; Military Commissions, New York Times.) 

DETAINEES CHARGED WITH 9/​11 ATTACKS

Five pris­on­ers are fac­ing cap­i­tal charges relat­ed to the attack on the United States that occurred on September 11, 2001. They were first charged before a war court at Guantánamo Bay in February 2008, and the U.S. indi­cat­ed that it would seek the death penal­ty against the pris­on­ers. They were lat­er indict­ed on December 14, 2009, in the Southern District of New York, where they were to be tried in the fed­er­al courts. But the fol­low­ing year, in December 2010, the U.S. Congress enact­ed a law that would pre­vent fund­ing to trans­fer the defen­dants to the United States, even to face pros­e­cu­tion. For that rea­son, on April 4, 2011, the Attorney General sought dis­missal of the indict­ment in fed­er­al court and referred the case to the Department of Defense so that the defen­dants could be pros­e­cut­ed by a mil­i­tary com­mis­sion. They were arraigned on May 5, 2012, before a mil­i­tary court in Guantánamo Bay. Since that time, defense coun­sel have raised con­cerns about their abil­i­ty to fair­ly rep­re­sent the defen­dants because of delays in secu­ri­ty clear­ances, the strict lim­i­ta­tions imposed on com­mu­ni­ca­tions, lim­i­ta­tions on access to and abil­i­ty to inter­view gov­ern­men­t’s wit­ness­es, and illic­it mon­i­tor­ing of attor­ney-client priv­i­leged com­mu­ni­ca­tions. The five detainees have not yet been tried, and it is unclear when a tri­al date will be set.

(1) Khalid Shaikh Mohammed. Mohammed, who the gov­ern­ment has alleged is the mas­ter­mind behind the 9/​11 attacks on the U.S., was cap­tured in Pakistan in March 2003 and imme­di­ate­ly turned over to the U.S. In September 2006, the U.S. indi­cat­ed that Mohammed had been in a secret loca­tion but was being trans­ferred to Guantánamo Bay. In February 2008, the CIA direc­tor Gen. Michael V. Hayden con­firmed that water­board­ing had been used when interrogating Mohammed. 

(2) Walid bin Attash. Bin Attash was arrest­ed in Pakistan in April 2003 for his sus­pect­ed involve­ment in the bomb­ing of the USS Cole. He was trans­ferred to Guantánamo Bay in September 2006. In April 2017, lawyers for bin Attash sued the Department of Defense alleg­ing that the mil­i­tary has exposed the defense team to ele­vat­ed risks of can­cer due to envi­ron­men­tal haz­ards at the prison complex.

(3) Ramzi bin al-Shibh. Bin al-Shibh was cap­tured in Pakistan in September 2002, where he was tor­tured dur­ing inter­ro­ga­tion and remained in an undis­closed loca­tion until September 2006, when he was trans­ferred to Guantánamo Bay. His psy­chi­atric con­di­tion has been ques­tioned, and almost a dozen experts have con­firmed a diag­no­sis of delu­sion­al dis­or­der, which appears to stem from the extreme phys­i­cal and psy­cho­log­i­cal tor­ture he suf­fered while being inter­ro­gat­ed — tor­ture that includ­ed being chained naked to the ceil­ing, deprived of sleep for more than 72 hours at a time, and sub­ject­ed to long stretch­es of dark­ness, cold tem­per­a­tures and per­sis­tent loud music.” In April 2014, it was revealed that the FBI believed a defense team mem­ber’s 2013 good luck wish to one of Bin al-Shibh’s cousins was a cod­ed” mes­sage and tried to turn the mem­ber of Bin al Shibh’s defense team into a con­fi­den­tial infor­mant,” caus­ing defense coun­sel to seek delay of tri­al and ask for inves­ti­ga­tion into the actions of the FBI.

(4) Ali Abdul Aziz Ali (AKA, Ammar al Baluchi). The nephew of Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, al Baluchi was arrest­ed in Pakistan in April 2003, and trans­ferred to Guantánamo Bay in September 2006. While he was being inter­ro­gat­ed, CIA offi­cials forcibly kept his head under the water while he strug­gled to breathe and beat him repeat­ed­ly, hit­ting him with a trun­cheon-like object and smash­ing his head against a wall.” In March 2017, his attor­neys asked the judge to order the gov­ern­ment to turn over infor­ma­tion relat­ed to their clien­t’s deten­tion and inter­ro­ga­tion and are seek­ing to have any con­fes­sions exclud­ed from trial. 

(5) Mustafa al Hawsawi. Hawsawi was cap­tured in Pakistan in March 2003, and trans­ferred to Guantánamo Bay in September 2006. Before he was trans­ferred, like oth­er pris­on­ers, he was inter­ro­gat­ed and tor­tured. The tor­ture he endured includ­ed sodomy, which affect­ed him so bad­ly that he has to man­u­al­ly rein­sert parts of his rec­tal cav­i­ty” in order to have a bow­el move­ment. During a hear­ing in October 2016, a defense attor­ney indi­cat­ed that Hawsawi would be under­go­ing surgery to cor­rect the prob­lem that has caused him anal bleed­ing for more than a decade.

DETAINEE CHARGED WITH BOMBING OF USS COLE

Abd al Rahim al Nashiri is fac­ing cap­i­tal charges relat­ed to the attack on the U.S. naval war­ship, the USS Cole, on October 12, 2000. Seventeen American ser­vice­men were killed and 39 oth­ers were injured in the attack. In November 2002, the U.S. announced that al Nashiri had been cap­tured and was being inter­ro­gat­ed in a secret loca­tion. On September 29, 2004, after being tried in absen­tia, al Nashiri was sen­tenced to death in Yemen. In September 2006, al Nashiri was trans­ferred to Guantánamo Bay, and has remained there since that time. In December 2008, the Department of Defense for­mal­ly approved war crimes charges against al Nashiri. Those charges, how­ev­er, were dropped and lat­er rein­stat­ed in April 2011. In 2017, his lawyers asked the Supreme Court to allow them to chal­lenge his mil­i­tary deten­tion — and efforts to try him in a mil­i­tary tri­bunal rather than a civil­ian court — because the CIA admit­ted­ly sub­ject­ed him to 14 years of phys­i­cal, psy­cho­log­i­cal and sex­u­al tor­ture.” On October 16, 2017, the Supreme Court declined to hear the case. On October 13, 2017, al Nashiri’s defense team were allowed to with­draw from the case as a result of eth­i­cal con­cerns aris­ing out of the gov­ern­ment spy­ing on their legal meet­ings and a court order pre­vent­ing them from dis­cussing the inter­cep­tion of attor­ney-client com­mu­ni­ca­tions with al Nashiri.