North Carolina Preparing to Execute Mentally Ill Man

Sammy Perkins is sched­uled for exe­cu­tion in North Carolina on October 8, despite his men­tal ill­ness and the fact that the jurors at his tri­al did not learn the extent of his dis­abil­i­ty. According to a press release from Perkins’s attorneys:
The jury nev­er heard the full sto­ry of Sammy Perkins’ men­tal dis­or­der: A fam­i­ly his­to­ry of psy­chi­atric prob­lems left its mark on Sammy Perkins. Several fam­i­ly mem­bers suf­fered from men­tal ill­ness­es. In his late teens and ear­ly twen­ties, the time when bi-polar dis­or­ders are often dis­cov­ered, Perkins was found rant­i­ng in pub­lic, some­times com­plete­ly naked. From a poor fam­i­ly, he was not able to get psy­chi­atric help, treat­ment or med­ica­tion. Bi-polar dis­or­der, left untreat­ed, is a debil­i­tat­ing men­tal ill­ness, with wild mood swings, depres­sion and man­ic highs dur­ing which the per­son can be out of touch with real­i­ty. As he self-med­icat­ed his moods and depres­sion with cocaine, hero­in and alco­hol, the con­di­tion wors­ened. Myasthenia Gravis claimed Perkins as well. This autoim­mune dis­ease caus­es mus­cu­lar weak­ness. Prescription Prednisone, giv­en to Perkins to abate the symp­toms, caus­es eupho­ria, hyper­ac­tiv­i­ty and is high­ly addic­tive.” (Press Release, Sept. 29, 2004, Attorneys Ed West: 910.254.4748 and Nora Hargrove: 910.763.7952).
UPDATE: Sammy Perkins was exe­cut­ed by the state of North Carolina the morn­ing of October 82004.

Texas Board Recommends Clemency on Eve of Execution

On the eve of the Kelsey Patterson’s sched­uled exe­cu­tion in Texas, the state’s Board of Pardons and Paroles vot­ed 5 – 1 to rec­om­mend that Governor Rick Perry com­mute Patterson’s death sen­tence to life in prison. In its rare rec­om­men­da­tion for clemen­cy, the Board not­ed that if Governor Perry refus­es to grant clemen­cy, Patterson, a men­tal­ly ill man who is sched­uled to be exe­cut­ed on Tuesday, May 18th, should receive a 120-day reprieve. The Board’s actions mark the first time in more than two decades that mem­bers have rec­om­mend­ed a com­mu­ta­tion to the gov­er­nor at such a late state in a con­demned inmate’s case. Patterson has been diag­nosed as a para­noid schiz­o­phrenic who, in the years lead­ing up to his cap­i­tal mur­der con­vic­tion, was ruled men­tal­ly incom­pe­tent to stand tri­al on unre­lat­ed charges. His impend­ing exe­cu­tion renewed the ques­tion of whether it is prop­er to exe­cute some­one who is men­tal­ly ill when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2002 that it is uncon­sti­tu­tion­al to exe­cute some­one who is intel­lec­tu­al­ly dis­abled. (Associated Press, May 18, 2004) UPDATE: Despite the rec­om­men­da­tion of the Pardons and Paroles Board, Governor Perry denied the clemen­cy request, and Patterson was exe­cut­ed on May 18, 2004. See Clemency. Read Amnesty International’s Report on Kelsey Patterson.

Seriously Mentally Ill Man Facing Execution in Texas

On May 18th, Texas plans to exe­cute Kelsey Patterson, a men­tal­ly ill man who was first diag­nosed with para­noid schiz­o­phre­nia more than a decade before he mur­dered two women in 1992. After the mur­der, Patterson wan­dered around dressed only in his socks. Although a jury found Patterson com­pe­tent to stand tri­al, he repeat­ed­ly inter­rupt­ed the pro­ceed­ings to offer a ram­bling nar­ra­tive about implant­ed devices and oth­er aspects of a con­spir­a­cy against him. According to a new report from Amnesty International, Patterson’s delu­sions did not allow him to under­stand what was going on or the abil­i­ty to con­sult with his attor­neys. In 2000, a fed­er­al judge echoed the con­cerns that have been raised about Patterson’s case, not­ing, Patterson had no motive for the killings…he claims he com­mits acts invol­un­tar­i­ly and out­side forces con­trol him through implants in his brain and body. Patterson has con­sis­tent­ly main­tained he is a vic­tim of an elab­o­rate con­spir­a­cy, and his lawyers and his doc­tors are part of that con­spir­a­cy. He refus­es to coop­er­ate with either; he has refused to be exam­ined by men­tal health pro­fes­sion­als since 1984, he refus­es den­tal treat­ment, and he refus­es to acknowl­edge that his lawyers rep­re­sent him.” Nevertheless, the judge upheld Patterson’s death sen­tence. The issue of exe­cut­ing the men­tal­ly ill has been raised in Texas on numer­ous occa­sions, most recent­ly in February 2004, when anoth­er men­tal­ly ill man, Scott Panetti, received a 60-day stay of exe­cu­tion short­ly before he was sched­uled for exe­cu­tion. The United Nations Commission on Human Rights has repeat­ed­ly called for an end to the use of the death penal­ty against peo­ple with men­tal dis­or­ders. (Amnesty International Press Release, May 182004).

Mentally Ill Man Convicted, Sentenced to Death In Three Hours

A Tennessee jury took only 2 hours to con­vict and anoth­er hour to sen­tence Richard Taylor to death. Taylor suf­fers from men­tal ill­ness and defend­ed him­self. The tri­al took place 19 years after Taylor’s orig­i­nal 1984 death sen­tence, which was set aside because he had inad­e­quate rep­re­sen­ta­tion and his com­plex men­tal-health his­to­ry had not been ful­ly inves­ti­gat­ed. In the years since that rul­ing, Taylor has been deemed incom­pe­tent to stand tri­al, but a judge recent­ly ruled that Taylor could be retried for the crime if he took his anti-psy­chot­ic med­ica­tions and was able to under­stand the legal pro­ceed­ings against him. Before his tri­al, Taylor told reporters for The Tennessean that he hoped to be con­vict­ed in the belief that he would be allowed to stop tak­ing the med­ica­tions that he claims are fog­ging his mind, turn­ing him into a woman and silenc­ing the singing voic­es in his head. This belief con­tin­ued as Taylor rep­re­sent­ed him­self in the pro­ceed­ings with­out any assis­tance from lawyers. Taylor — who suf­fers from bor­der­line per­son­al­i­ty dis­or­der and schiz­o­phre­nia — put on no evi­dence, pre­sent­ed no clos­ing argu­ment, and wore sun­glass­es through­out the pro­ceed­ings. He offered the jury no expla­na­tions or mit­i­gat­ing fac­tors to con­sid­er before they sen­tenced him to death. (The Tennessean, October 17, 2003) See DPIC’s report With Justice for Few: The Growing Crisis in Death Penalty Representation.

Virginia Schedules Execution of Mentally Ill Man

On May 28th, Virginia is sched­uled to elec­tro­cute Percy Levar Walton, a Virginia death row inmate who does not know what year it is or that he can­not eat at Burger King once he has been exe­cut­ed. In a pend­ing clemen­cy peti­tion to Virginia Governor Mark Warner and in an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, Walton’s attor­neys pre­sent­ed expert med­ical evi­dence, includ­ing tests by prison doc­tors, show­ing that their client suf­fers from schiz­o­phre­nia and psy­chosis. They note that prison guards call Walton Horse,” short for Crazy Horse,” and that the guards stay at arms lengths to avoid his stench (a clas­sic symp­tom of schiz­o­phre­nia). In addi­tion to Walton’s men­tal ill­ness, he scored a 66 on a recent IQ test and may be intel­lec­tu­al­ly dis­abled. A per­son with an IQ of 70 or low­er is gen­er­al­ly con­sid­ered intel­lec­tu­al­ly dis­abled. (Associated Press, May 22, 2003) See Clemency.

Nevada House Votes to Spare Juveniles

Members of Nevada’s Assembly over­whelm­ing­ly passed three leg­isla­tive mea­sures to reform the state’s death penal­ty. The bills include a ban on the exe­cu­tion of juve­nile offend­ers and those with intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ties. The third piece of leg­is­la­tion adds the mit­i­gat­ing fac­tor of men­tal ill­ness to those fac­tors con­sid­ered by the sen­tenc­ing jury and gives defense coun­sel the last argu­ment dur­ing the sen­tenc­ing phase of a cap­i­tal tri­al. Assemblywoman Sheila Leslie, chair of the inter­im com­mit­tee that stud­ied Nevada’s death penal­ty and intro­duced the three mea­sures, said, I think it reflects the evolv­ing opin­ion of Nevadans and the nation about how the death penal­ty can be applied fair­ly and appro­pri­ate­ly.” The bills now move to the Senate for con­sid­er­a­tion. (Las Vegas Sun, April 1, 2003) See Juveniles.

Supreme Court Grants Stay to Mentally Ill Texas Man

More than two hours after the orig­i­nal­ly sched­uled time for the November 6th exe­cu­tion of Texas death row inmate James Colburn, the United States Supreme Court issued a stay of exe­cu­tion to allow attor­neys time to request a full hear­ing. Lawyers for Colburn assert that his severe men­tal ill­ness ren­dered him inca­pable of com­pre­hend­ing the pro­ceed­ings against him or the rea­sons for his exe­cu­tion. Some of Colburn’s tri­al jurors, includ­ing the fore­man, have filed affi­davits sup­port­ing the defense’s claim. (Washington Post, November 7, 2002) See Supreme Court.

Execution of Juvenile Offender Scheduled in Missouri

Chris Simmons, who was sched­uled to be exe­cut­ed in Missouri on June 5, received a stay of exe­cu­tion from the U.S. Supreme Court. Simmons, a 17 year-old high school stu­dent at the time of the crime, was under the influ­ence of drugs and alco­hol and was also found to be suf­fer­ing from schizo­typ­al dis­or­der, a men­tal ill­ness. At tri­al, Simmons’ attor­ney failed to present evi­dence of this men­tal dis­or­der or evi­dence of Simmons’ child­hood abuse by his father. (Missourians to Abolish the Death Penalty, Action Alert, 4/​13/​02) Since the death penal­ty was rein­stat­ed, Missouri has exe­cut­ed one juve­nile offend­er. UPDATE: On August 26, 2003, the Missouri State Supreme Court threw out Simmons’ death sen­tence and resen­tenced him to Life Without Parole.

Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles Commutes Sentence to Life

Alexander Williams was grant­ed clemen­cy by the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles on February 25. A spokes­woman for the Board stat­ed that Williams’s men­tal ill­ness, his sta­tus as a juve­nile offend­er, and his his­to­ry of abuse as a child were fac­tors lead­ing to the Board’s deci­sion to com­mute his death sen­tence to life with­out parole. The Board received many pleas for clemen­cy, includ­ing those from the United Nations Commission on Human Rights, the European Union, the American Bar Association, and for­mer First Lady Rosalynn Carter. (New York Times, 2/​26/​02)