• Closing of the Capital Defender Office Will Save the State Millions as New York’s Death Penalty Ends New York’s Capital Defender Office is prepar­ing to close its doors in the wake of a N.Y. Court of Appeals rul­ing that dis­posed of the final appeal of a death sen­tence under the cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment law declared uncon­sti­tu­tion­al in 2004. It is … my inten­tion to close the office as soon as prac­ti­cal­ly pos­si­ble,” said Kevin M. Doyle, who has served as Executive Director of the defend­er office estab­lished in 1995. Doyle said there is no point in keep­ing the office open giv­en the sta­tus of the death penal­ty in New York and not­ed that the office will close with­in a mat­ter of months. At one time the Capital Defender Office had more than 70 staffers and an annu­al bud­get of $14 mil­lion. Now it has a $1.3 mil­lion bud­get and six peo­ple on staff. The remain­ing staffers now have the respon­si­bil­i­ty of review­ing some 3,000 box­es of infor­ma­tion about its cas­es and find­ing a way to prop­er­ly pre­serve priv­i­leged mate­ri­als. Since the office was estab­lished, 10,000 mur­ders have occurred in New York. Prosecutors con­sid­ered bring­ing the death penal­ty in 877 cap­i­tal-eli­gi­ble cas­es, and dis­trict attor­neys filed notice of intent to seek the death penal­ty in 58 cas­es. Juries in only sev­en cas­es ulti­mate­ly returned death sen­tences. No one was exe­cut­ed. In many instances, thanks to the Capital Defender Office, the D.A.s decid­ed not to seek the death penal­ty. The rel­a­tive­ly small amount of mon­ey spent on pre­sen­ta­tion before the D.A.s saved the state a lot of mon­ey,” said attor­ney Ronald Tabak, pres­i­dent of New York Lawyers Against the Death Penalty and spe­cial coun­sel at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom. The New York Department of Correctional Services will also ben­e­fit from the Court of Appeals rul­ing. The death row at Clinton Correctional Facility will now close, sav­ing the state an esti­mat­ed $300,000 per year. (New York Law Journal, October 292007).
  • New York High Court Overturns Last Death Sentence Because Statute is Unconstitutional The New York Court of Appeals ruled today (October 23, 2007) that the death sen­tence of the last remain­ing inmate on the state’s death row was uncon­sti­tu­tion­al under state law. John Taylors sen­tence will be changed to life in prison with­out parole. An ear­li­er deci­sion by the state’s high court in 2004 over­turned the state’s statute because of flaws in the jury instruc­tions. (People v. LaValle). Following hear­ings on the prob­lems with cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment in the state, the New York leg­is­la­ture has repeat­ed­ly reject­ed attempts to re-instate the death penal­ty. (Associated Press, NY Times, Oct. 23, 2007). New York is now in the same posi­tion of oth­er states such as Massachusetts where the death penal­ty law was over­turned and the leg­is­la­ture has not re-instat­ed cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment. This leaves 37 states with death penal­ty laws in the country.
  • New York Assembly Committee Blocks Death Penalty By Wider Margin Members of the New York Assembly’s Codes Committee recent­ly vot­ed 13 – 5 against a bill to rein­state the death penal­ty, a vote that revealed a grow­ing bi-par­ti­san oppo­si­tion to cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment. Last year’s vote on the same mea­sure was 11 – 7. New York’s death penal­ty was over­turned in 2004 by the state’s high­est court. A num­ber of Assembly mem­bers have said they no longer sup­port the death penal­ty because of grow­ing evi­dence that it risks inno­cent lives and because the state now has the alter­na­tive sen­tenc­ing option of life with­out parole, which was not avail­able when New York rein­stat­ed the death penal­ty in 1995. (Gannett News Service, June 14, 2006). See Recent Legislative Activity.
  • New York Takes Historic Step Towards Ending the Death Penalty The Codes Committee of the New York Assembly has vot­ed 11 – 7 against con­sid­er­ing leg­is­la­tion to re-instate the death penal­ty in New York, a deci­sion that like­ly ends such efforts dur­ing this leg­isla­tive term. The Committee vote came after five days of hear­ings in New York City and Albany at which almost all the speak­ers raised seri­ous prob­lems about New York’s statute and the death penalty generally. 
  • New York Lawmakers Say Death Penalty’s Future May Be In Doubt According to promi­nent New York law­mak­ers, there is lit­tle chance that leg­is­la­tors will pass a bill this year to fix the state’s uncon­sti­tu­tion­al death penal­ty. Many experts believe that the state’s statute, which N.Y.‘s high­est court struck down ear­li­er this year, may nev­er be re-enact­ed. Republican Senator Dale M. Volker not­ed that when the Court of Appeals struck down the law, New York heard the death knell of the death penal­ty, for the time being.” Sheldon Silver, the Democratic Speaker of the Assembly and a death penal­ty pro­po­nent, not­ed that many peo­ple are will­ing to accept life with­out parole, which was not an avail­able rem­e­dy before 10 years ago.” Silver stat­ed, Many peo­ple have ques­tions. I don’t think it’s some­thing that should be on a fast track.” In the com­ing weeks, New York’s Assembly will hold pub­lic hear­ings regard­ing the state’s death penal­ty laws. (New York Times, November 18, 2004). The hear­ings are sched­uled to take place in New York City on December 15 and in Albany on January 25. See DPIC’s Summary of People v. Stephen LaValle (over­turn­ing N.Y.‘s death penal­ty).
  • New York Legislators Put Off Attempts to Fix State’s Death Penalty Law Despite efforts by some state lead­ers to quick­ly fix” the state’s death penal­ty stat­ue, oppo­si­tion from many leg­is­la­tors halt­ed attempts to pass a bill before the sum­mer recess at the end of July. At a leg­isla­tive con­fer­ence on the issue, Assemblyman Jeffrion Aubry not­ed that a lot of peo­ple who spoke were against it.” These sen­ti­ments prompt­ed Majority Leader Paul Tokasz to announce that leg­is­la­tors were going to take some time with it” before decid­ing how to address con­cerns raised by the court. The Court of Appeals struck down the law in June, say­ing its sen­tenc­ing pro­vi­sions were coer­cive. Legislators will recon­vene in August. (Rochester Democrat and Chronicle, July 22, 2004) Read DPIC’s sum­ma­ry of the New York rul­ing.
  • On September 18, 2001, the New York Legislature con­vened in a spe­cial ses­sion where it enact­ed a broad anti-ter­ror­ism law and expand­ed the scope of the state’s death penal­ty. The Anti-Terrorism Act of 2001 estab­lish­es six new ter­ror­ism-relat­ed offens­es, and amends the state’s death penal­ty statute to allow the death penal­ty for some­one who com­mits mur­der in fur­ther­ance of ter­ror­ist activ­i­ty. State Senator Thomas Duane, who opposed the leg­is­la­tion, stat­ed, The fed­er­al gov­ern­ment already has laws which would bring the death penal­ty to those who uti­lize weapons of mass destruc­tion.” The new laws also expand the num­ber of offens­es that enable law enforce­ment offi­cials to obtain war­rants for eaves­drop­ping and sur­veil­lance. (New York Law Journal, 9/​18/​01)
  • By a vote of 39 – 12, the New York City Council has called for a mora­to­ri­um on exe­cu­tions until a com­mis­sion can inves­ti­gate the state’s death penal­ty in rela­tion to issues of fair­ness, jus­tice, equi­ty, due process, and cost. New York City is the largest of 73 munic­i­pal­i­ties around the nation to pass sim­i­lar res­o­lu­tions in favor of a mora­to­ri­um. People are begin­ning to real­ize that a sys­tem that is unfair and plagued with prob­lems should not be per­mit­ted to con­tin­ue,” said Councilwoman Yvette Clarke. New York City has been at the cen­ter of nation­al atten­tion since the trag­ic ter­ror­ist attacks of September 11th. In spite of this, the Council is urg­ing state offi­cials to more close­ly exam­ine the death penal­ty before going ahead with exe­cu­tions. See NCADP’s Press Release.