NEWS (3/​27/​20): California — A three-judge pan­el of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (pic­tured) has affirmed a California fed­er­al dis­trict court’s denial of habeas cor­pus relief for death-row pris­on­er Rodney Berryman, Sr.

The court ruled that jurists of rea­son could dis­agree with the dis­trict court’s rejec­tion of Berryman’s claim that his tri­al lawyer was inef­fec­tive for fail­ing to inves­ti­gate and present men­tal health evi­dence that the killing was not pre­med­i­tat­ed or inten­tion­al. Ultimately, how­ev­er, the court denied that claim. It also denied relief on Berryman’s claim that his coun­sel had been inef­fec­tive in the penal­ty phase of tri­al for fail­ing to present mit­i­gat­ing evi­dence about Berryman’s back­ground, upbring­ing, and brain dam­age. The appeals court deferred to the California courts’ rul­ing that the fail­ure to present this evi­dence was not prej­u­di­cial, say­ing that the state court deter­mi­na­tion had not been unreasonable.