News Brief — Recent Death-Penalty Decisions Through March 6

NEWS (3/​6/​20): The United States Court of Military Appeals has upheld the con­vic­tion and death sen­tence of Timothy Hennis, fol­low­ing his acquit­tal in North Carolina on the same charges. The court’s rul­ing, issued on February 28, reject­ed Hennis’ chal­lenges to the mil­i­tary court’s juris­dic­tion to try him for a May 1985 rape and triple murder. 

Hennis had been con­vict­ed of the charges in the North Carolina state courts in July 1986 and was sen­tenced to death. On appeal, the North Carolina Supreme Court over­turned his con­vic­tion and grant­ed him a new tri­al. He was acquit­ted of all charges in April 1989. Hennis was hon­or­ably dis­charged in June 1989, re-enlist­ed, and retired in 2004. In 2006, new DNA test­ing linked him to the mur­ders. The Army then recalled him to active duty and charged him with the mur­ders. Hennis was sen­tenced to death by a mil­i­tary court-mar­tial in 2010.


The Ohio Supreme Court has grant­ed a new tri­al to Cincinnati death-row pris­on­er Glen Bates, rul­ing that his tri­al lawyer was inef­fec­tive for fail­ing to ques­tion a juror about her racial bias, chal­lenge her for cause, or exer­cise one of his remain­ing dis­cre­tionary strikes to pre­vent her from serv­ing in the case.

Bates was con­vict­ed and sen­tenced to death for the mur­der of his two-year-old daugh­ter, who had been starved and abused over an extend­ed time peri­od. Asked in a jury ques­tion­naire whether Some races and/​or eth­nic groups tend to be more vio­lent than oth­ers,” the juror indi­cat­ed that she strong­ly agree[d]” and then wrote in the space pro­vid­ed for expla­na­tion: Blacks.” When asked whether there was any racial or eth­nic group that you do not feel com­fort­able being around?,” she respond­ed: Sometimes black peo­ple.” Bates’ lawyer accept­ed her as a juror with­out ques­tion­ing her about her biases.

In a 5 – 2 opin­ion issued on February 27, the court ruled that the seat­ing of this juror cre­at­ed a con­sti­tu­tion­al­ly unac­cept­able risk that a pow­er­ful racial stereo­type — that of black men as vio­lence prone,’ infect­ed the jury’s delib­er­a­tions,” in vio­la­tion of Bates’ right to an impartial jury.


The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on March 3 upheld a South Carolina fed­er­al dis­trict court rul­ing deny­ing habeas cor­pus relief to Richard Moore, who was sen­tenced to death for the killing of a store clerk dur­ing an armed rob­bery in 1999. Moore had pre­sent­ed new evi­dence to the fed­er­al court that sug­gest­ed the store clerk had fired the first shot and that the killing had not been pre­med­i­tat­ed. The appeals court held that new evi­dence did not fun­da­men­tal­ly alter the claims Moore had pre­vi­ous­ly raised in the South Carolina state courts and that the state court had not unrea­son­ably reject­ed that claim.


On March 5, the Florida Supreme Court upheld a low­er court rul­ing deny­ing Delmer Smiths post-con­vic­tion chal­lenge to his con­vic­tion and death sen­tence. Smith’s jury had unan­i­mous­ly rec­om­mend­ed he be sen­tenced to death for the beat­ing death of a Manatee County woman dur­ing a home bur­glary in 2012.