In August 2009, North Carolina passed the Racial Justice Act, becom­ing the sec­ond state to allow courts to con­sid­er sta­tis­ti­cal evi­dence as proof of racial bias in the admin­is­tra­tion of the death penal­ty. As ini­tial­ly writ­ten, the North Carolina law per­mit­ted a judge to over­turn a death sen­tence or pre­vent pros­e­cu­tors from seek­ing the death penal­ty in an indi­vid­ual case upon proof of racial bias. Governor Beverly Purdue, who signed the act into law, stat­ed I have always been a sup­port­er of death penal­ty, but I have always believed it must be car­ried out fair­ly. The Racial Justice Act ensures that when North Carolina hands down our state’s harsh­est pun­ish­ment to our most heinous crim­i­nals – the deci­sion is based on the facts and the law, not racial prejudice.”

Marcus Robinson was the first defen­dant to receive a hear­ing under the RJA. During that hear­ing, he pre­sent­ed evi­dence of a long his­to­ry of racial bias by North Carolina pros­e­cu­tors in cap­i­tal case jury selec­tion, at the state and coun­ty lev­els and in his par­tic­u­lar case. On April 22, 2012, North Carolina Superior Court Judge Greg Weeks cred­it­ed Robinson’s evi­dence, hold­ing that race was a mate­ri­al­ly, prac­ti­cal­ly and sta­tis­ti­cal­ly sig­nif­i­cant fac­tor in the deci­sion to exer­cise peremp­to­ry chal­lenges dur­ing jury selec­tion by pros­e­cu­tors” at the time of Robinson’s tri­al. Judge Weeks over­turned Robinson’s death sen­tence and re-sen­tenced him to life with­out pos­si­bil­i­ty of parole. The pros­e­cu­tion appealed and the leg­is­la­ture amend­ed the RJA to make it more dif­fi­cult to win relief in future cases.

On December 13, 2012, after a con­sol­i­dat­ed evi­den­tiary hear­ing for three oth­er death row pris­on­ers con­duct­ed under the amend­ed RJA statute, Judge Weeks found that a wealth of evi­dence” had demon­strat­ed that North Carolina pros­e­cu­tors had engaged in a decades-long prac­tice of inten­tion­al race dis­crim­i­na­tion in jury selec­tion in cap­i­tal cas­es. As a result of the per­sis­tent, per­va­sive, and dis­tort­ing role of race in jury selec­tion through­out North Carolina,” he vacat­ed the death sen­tences imposed upon Quintel Augustine, Christina Walters, and Tilmon Golphin and resen­tenced them to life with­out parole. Again, pros­e­cu­tors appealed the ruling.

The North Carolina state leg­is­la­ture respond­ed on June 5, 2013, by repeal­ing the Racial Justice Act. The state’s new Governor, Pat McCrory, signed the repeal bill. On December 18, 2015, the North Carolina Supreme Court reversed Judge Weeks’ rulings on pro­ce­dur­al grounds. The Court said that fun­da­men­tal fair­ness” required that pros­e­cu­tors be afford­ed more time to to pre­pare for this unusu­al and com­plex pro­ceed­ing.” The court remand­ed the pro­ceed­ings to the tri­al court and invit­ed both sides to present addi­tion­al sta­tis­ti­cal evi­dence at a new hear­ing. A new hear­ing has been sched­uled, to be presided over by Judge Jim Ammons, whom defense lawyers have sought to recuse from the case on grounds of bias, includ­ing that as the pros­e­cu­tor in a cap­i­tal mur­der tri­al in 1988, he dis­pro­por­tion­ate­ly exer­cised dis­cre­tionary jury strikes to exclude qual­i­fied black prospec­tive jurors at 3.3 times the rate that he struck all oth­er qual­i­fied potential jurors.