• South Carolina and Oklahoma Governors Sign Bills Expanding Death Penalty South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford and Oklahoma Governor Brad Henry have signed into law leg­is­la­tion that allows proseuc­tors to seek the death penal­ty for repeat child moles­ters. The new South Carolina law allows a death sen­tence if the accused has been twice con­vict­ed of rap­ing a child younger than 11-years-old. It also sets a 25-year manda­to­ry min­i­mum prison sen­tence for some sex offend­ers, man­dates that peo­ple con­vict­ed of crim­i­nal sex­u­al con­duct in the first degree wear an elec­tron­ic mon­i­tor­ing device, and requires reg­is­tered sex offend­ers to update their address every six months. The Oklahoma mea­sure makes the death penal­ty an option for any­one con­vict­ed of a sec­ond or sub­se­quent con­vic­tion for rape, sodomy, or lewd molesta­tion involv­ing a child under 14. Oklahoma, South Carolina, Montana, Louisiana, and Florida are the only states to allow the death penal­ty for cer­tain sex crimes. No one con­vict­ed of a sex offense has been exe­cut­ed since the U.S. Supreme Court rein­stat­ed the cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment 30 years ago. David Bruck, a law pro­fes­sor at Washington and Lee University, said the mea­sures might actu­al­ly put child rape vic­tims’ lives at risk. He notes, The last mes­sage you want to give an offend­er who has the life of a child in his hands is you might as well kill the child because he’d already got the death penal­ty. This is a very stu­pid mes­sage.” (Associated Press, June 8, 2006 and June 9, 2006). See Recent Legislative Activity. The con­sti­tu­tion­al­i­ty of the law is not clear because the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that the death penal­ty for rape of an adult is barred by the Eighth Amendment. (Coker v. Georgia (1977)).
  • In South Carolina, law­mak­ers have aban­doned a leg­isla­tive pro­vi­sion that would have allowed the death penal­ty for sex offend­ers con­vict­ed a sec­ond time of assault­ing chil­dren younger than 11 years old. Legislators in the South Carolina House elim­i­nat­ed the pro­pos­al because it like­ly would have pre­vent­ed a broad­er sex offend­er bill from pass­ing through the leg­is­la­ture before the General Assembly adjourns on June 1. Opponents of the death penal­ty pro­vi­sion have said the state would face hefty legal bills to defend the law and that impos­ing the death penal­ty on this class of offend­ers would give them no incen­tive to spare their vic­tims’ lives. (Associated Press, May 212006).
  • South Carolina Bill To Expand Death Penalty Draws Criticism A bill to expand South Carolina’s cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment statute so that those who are con­vict­ed a sec­ond time of rap­ing chil­dren under 11 are eli­gi­ble for the death penal­ty has drawn crit­i­cism from those who wor­ry the bill may result in unin­tend­ed con­se­quences. Fears that the leg­is­la­tion will lead to fam­i­ly mem­bers refus­ing to come for­ward regard­ing intra-fam­i­ly offens­es and that it may also result in more rape vic­tims being killed are among the chief con­cerns regard­ing the pro­posed leg­is­la­tion. The bill has been approved by the South Carolina Senate and will soon be con­sid­ered by leg­is­la­tors in the House. Kent Scheidegger, legal direc­tor of the pro-death penal­ty Criminal Justice Legal Foundation in California, said that a state should­n’t impose the death penal­ty for twice con­vict­ed sex offend­ers sim­ply to give the rapist an incen­tive not to kill the vic­tim.” DPIC Executive Director Richard Dieter agreed, adding, It may actu­al­ly cre­ate more death because the per­son fac­ing the death pen­laty for this kind of offense might be inclined to say, No greater pun­ish­ment incurred if I kill the vic­tim’.” The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled the death penal­ty can’t be used in cas­es involv­ing adult rapes, but it has not weighed in the issue of impos­ing the death penal­ty on those who com­mit child rapes. South Carolina Representative Fletcher Smith said that he believes the pro­posed bill won’t meet con­sti­tu­tion­al stan­dards regard­ing the death penal­ty because a death is not involved. (Associated Press, April 4, 2006) See Crimes Punishable by the Death Penalty.