The Tallahassee Democrat

If an automak­er led the indus­try in recalls, then spun the bad news as proof of excel­lent self-reg­u­la­tion, con­sumers would be skep­ti­cal. The automak­er might deserve kudos for its efforts to rec­ti­fy prob­lems, but the high recall rate still would indi­cate a seri­ous prob­lem. A respon­si­ble com­pa­ny would iden­ti­fy the defi­cien­cy before so many recalls were required.

That’s why it’s so dif­fi­cult to under­stand the rea­son­ing of Florida death penal­ty advo­cates who resist calls for a mora­to­ri­um to thor­ough­ly exam­ine the admin­is­tra­tion of jus­tice in capital cases.

In 2000, nine death sen­tences in Florida were over­turned, the high­est num­ber in the nation, accord­ing to a U.S. Department of Justice report released Tuesday. Yet, defend­ers of the sys­tem insist that such sta­tis­tics prove the sys­tem works, since defen­dants in those cas­es aren’t exe­cut­ed — at least until they’re retried with­out legal error.

That’s of no small con­se­quence, of course, but Florida’s high rate of over­turned cap­i­tal con­vic­tions remains trou­bling. It alone war­rants a tem­po­rary sus­pen­sion of exe­cu­tions — as Gov. George Ryan of Illinois ordered in his state — so prob­lems in the process can be iden­ti­fied and fixed.

The American Bar Association has been at the fore­front of a nation­al mora­to­ri­um cam­paign, but has been care­ful to point out that it is not against cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment. The cam­paign includes sup­port­ers and oppo­nents of the death penal­ty who are unit­ed in their belief that more scruti­ny is needed.

More than 50 local gov­ern­ment boards in cities and towns across the United States have adopt­ed res­o­lu­tions urg­ing their gov­er­nors and leg­is­la­tures to declare a mora­to­ri­um. Steve Hanlon, a Tallahassee attor­ney and mora­to­ri­um activist, said the City Commission here may soon be asked to join them.

While there is cer­tain­ly no groundswell of sup­port for a mora­to­ri­um at our Capitol, recent nation­al polls indi­cate a grow­ing lev­el of con­cern about unfair­ness in the crim­i­nal jus­tice sys­tem, and an increas­ing num­ber of peo­ple who back a moratorium.

No sys­tem is flaw­less. But the final­i­ty of the death penal­ty demands that its admin­is­tra­tion be as near-per­fect as is humanly possible.