Science Daily Magazine

(NOTE: The orig­i­nal American Psychologist arti­cle states 12 of the 350 exe­cut­ed had IQs of 70 or below. The Science Daily Magazine arti­cle report­ed 112. The fol­low­ing text cor­rects that typo­graph­i­cal error.)

Timing Of IQ Test Can Be A Life Or Death Matter

The year in which IQ is test­ed can make the dif­fer­ence between life and death for a death row inmate. It also can deter­mine the eli­gi­bil­i­ty of chil­dren for spe­cial ser­vices, adults’ Social Security ben­e­fits and recruits’ suit­abil­i­ty for cer­tain mil­i­tary careers, accord­ing to a new study by Cornell University researchers. 

That’s because IQ scores tend to rise 5 to 25 points in a sin­gle gen­er­a­tion. This so-called Flynn effect” is cor­rect­ed by tough­en­ing up the test every 15 to 20 years to reset the mean score to 100. A score from a test tak­en at the end of one cycle can vary wide­ly from a score derived from a test tak­en at the begin­ning of the next cycle, when the test is more dif­fi­cult, says Stephen J. Ceci, pro­fes­sor of human devel­op­ment at Cornell. 

Ceci and his cur­rent and for­mer grad­u­ate stu­dents, Tomoe Kanaya and Matthew Scullin, found, for exam­ple, that the num­ber of chil­dren rec­om­mend­ed for spe­cial ser­vices for mild men­tal retar­da­tion tripled dur­ing the 1st 5 years of a new test com­pared with the final 5 years of an old test, despite the fact that there were no real changes in underlying intelligence.

Our find­ings imply that some bor­der­line death row inmates or cap­i­tal mur­der defen­dants who were not clas­si­fied as men­tal­ly retard­ed in child­hood because they took an old­er ver­sion of an IQ test might have qual­i­fied as retard­ed if they had tak­en a more recent test,” Ceci says. That’s the dif­fer­ence between being sen­tenced to life impris­on­ment ver­sus lethal injection.”

The study is pub­lished in the October issue of American Psychologist (Vol. 58, No. 10, pp. 778 – 790), a jour­nal of the American Psychological Association. Co-author Kanaya is a fourth-year grad­u­ate stu­dent in human devel­op­ment and is the first author. Scullin, Cornell Ph.D. 01, is now an assis­tant pro­fes­sor of psy­chol­o­gy at West Virginia University and is the second author.

The researchers ana­lyzed IQ data from almost 9,000 school psy­chol­o­gist spe­cial edu­ca­tion assess­ments in nine school dis­tricts across the coun­try to doc­u­ment how the reset­ting of the IQ test influ­ences men­tal retar­da­tion diag­noses for sev­er­al years after a new test is introduced.

The con­se­quences of tak­ing intel­li­gence tests at the end or begin­ning of a test’s cycle are most crit­i­cal, how­ev­er, when deter­min­ing whether a death row inmate is men­tal­ly com­pe­tent. Of the 350 peo­ple exe­cut­ed since 1990, 12 were known to have IQ scores of 70 or below (the cut­off for mental retardation).

Among chil­dren, the researchers found near­ly a six-point dif­fer­ence between those tak­ing the 2 tests. This vari­ance can make the dif­fer­ence between a child being diag­nosed as men­tal­ly retard­ed or not,” Ceci says. This study shows for the 1st time that 2 chil­dren in the same class­room with the same cog­ni­tive abil­i­ty could be diag­nosed dif­fer­ent­ly sim­ply because dif­fer­ent test norms were used for each child.”

The researchers report that per­haps tens of thou­sands of chil­dren could be affect­ed by these IQ trends over the course of their school years, with far-reach­ing finan­cial impli­ca­tions. Our results imply that mil­lions of tax­pay­ers’ edu­ca­tion­al dol­lars may be mis­al­lo­cat­ed because stu­dents are being mis­di­ag­nosed every year that an IQ test ages,” Ceci points out.

A diag­no­sis of men­tal retar­da­tion also deter­mines whether a per­son is eli­gi­ble for Social Security dis­abil­i­ty ben­e­fits. And the year in which a mil­i­tary recruit takes an IQ test can deter­mine whether he or she is eli­gi­ble for ser­vice or cer­tain occu­pa­tions and ranks.

Caution must be used when IQ scores are used to base impor­tant finan­cial, social or legal deci­sions. It may not be suf­fi­cient to sim­ply look to see if an IQ score is below some cut­off point,” con­cludes Ceci. The most impor­tant times to be par­tic­u­lar­ly care­ful are when the test is either at the begin­ning or the end of its cycle.” 

The research was sup­port­ed, in part, by a grant from the Smith Richardson Foundation to Ceci.