Entries tagged with “Michael James Jackson

Dec 16, 2024

Florida Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments Challenging Non-Unanimity Sentencing Standard

On December 12, 2024, the Florida Supreme Court heard oral argu­ments in the case of Michael James Jackson, who is chal­leng­ing the con­sti­tu­tion­al­i­ty of Florida’s 2023 law that allows for non-unan­i­­mous jury death sen­tences. Mr. Jackson is rep­re­sent­ed by the ACLU, who argued that the Florida law is uncon­sti­tu­tion­al under the Supreme Court’s 2020 rul­ing in Ramos v. Louisiana, which struck down non-unan­i­­mous crim­i­nal con­vic­tions. According to the ACLU’s brief,…

Jun 03, 2024

Amicus Briefs Submitted to Florida Supreme Court Describe Non-Unanimous Sentencing Law as a Quintessential Game of Chance”

In April 2023, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis signed leg­is­la­tion that low­ered the thresh­old for juries to rec­om­mend death sen­tences from a unan­i­mous vote to a vote of 8 – 4 in favor of death, and experts allege this law has result­ed in a quin­tes­sen­tial game of chance” for those await­ing cap­i­tal resen­tenc­ing or tri­al. An ami­cus brief, or friend-of-the-court brief, sub­mit­ted to the Florida Supreme Court argues that this change to the state’s death penal­ty process vio­lates capital defendants’…

Policy Issues

Arbitrariness

,

Sentencing Alternatives

,

Jan 03, 2024

Overwhelming Percentage of Florida’s Hurst Resentencing Hearings End in Life Sentences

According to new research by the Death Penalty Information Center, 82% of Florida death-sen­tenced pris­on­ers who com­plet­ed new sen­tenc­ing pro­ceed­ings under Hurst v. Florida (2016) have been resen­tenced to life in prison with­out parole. Hurst found Florida’s death penal­ty scheme uncon­sti­tu­tion­al, and the Florida Supreme Court sub­se­quent­ly held that new death sen­tences must be unan­i­mous, neces­si­tat­ing new sen­tenc­ing hear­ings. Of the 157 cas­es DPIC pre­vi­ous­ly identified as…

Policy Issues

Arbitrariness

,

Dec 01, 2020

Florida Supreme Court Limits Retroactive Scope of Its Ruling Permitting Death Sentences After Non-Unanimous Jury Votes

In two long-await­ed deci­sions that will alter the land­scape of Florida’s death row, the Florida Supreme Court has lim­it­ed the reach of a land­mark rul­ing that over­turned the state’s con­sti­tu­tion­al pro­hi­bi­tion against death sen­tences imposed after a non-unan­i­mous jury vote for death. The court’s January 2020 deci­sion in State v. Poole had raised the specter that the court might rescind orders that had over­turned the death sen­tences of more than 100 Florida death-row prisoners and…