With weeks left before his scheduled execution on May 21, 2026, counsel for Tennessee death-sentenced prisoner Tony Carruthers has asked the Tennessee Supreme Court to order DNA testing that they argue could prove their client’s innocence. On April 9, lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed an emergency motion seeking DNA testing “on specific pieces of probative physical evidence, most of which has never been tested, and which will likely point to the real perpetrator or perpetrators and avoid a wrongful execution.”
Mr. Carruthers was convicted and sentenced to death for his alleged involvement in the kidnapping and murder of Marcellos Anderson, Delois Anderson, and Frederick Tucker in 1994. Mr. Carruthers has long maintained his innocence. Forensic evidence has never connected Mr. Carruthers to the crime, and his conviction relied almost entirely on the testimony of a jailhouse informant, who Mr. Carruthers’ counsel now knows was paid for his testimony.
“Tennessee has the forensic evidence that could help answer that question, and they must test it before it is too late. There is no justification for barreling towards an execution while DNA evidence that could prove who really committed this crime remains untested.”
For 30 years, prosecutors maintained they did not incentivize their key witness, Albert Shaw, for his testimony against Mr. Carruthers. Despite numerous requests from defense counsel, the state did not produce evidence of Mr. Shaw’s status as a confidential, paid informant until August 2024. More than 20 pages of evidence handed over in August 2024 show that Mr. Shaw worked for the state, including “signed confidential agreements between Shaw and law enforcement dating back to mid-1980s and ledgers of payments to Mr. Shaw continuing to at least 2003.”
Mr. Carruthers’ co-defendant, James Montgomery, was also sentenced to death for his involvement in the kidnapping and murders, but in 2010, after being resentenced to a term of years, Mr. Montgomery came forward in a signed statement affirming what Mr. Carruthers long maintained: Mr. Carruthers was not involved in the crime. Instead, Mr. Montgomery pointed to another individual, Ronnie Irving. Mr. Irving was killed in 2002; however, his fingerprints and a DNA sample are on file with the medical examiner’s office. There is unidentified physical evidence from the crime scene, including fingerprints and an unknown male DNA profile, that have not been compared to those of Mr. Irving. Mr. Carruthers’ new motion asks the court to order a comparison of the unknown DNA to Mr. Irving and to allow for testing of three additional pieces of evidence found with the victims which have never been analyzed.
In addition to DNA testing, there are five fingerprints that were recovered from the crime scene that do not match Mr. Carruthers and remain unmatched at this time. Mr. Carruthers filed a pro se motion before the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals in September 2021 requesting further fingerprint testing, which remains pending. “Before the state carries out an irreversible punishment, it must answer the most basic question: did they get the right person,” said Maria DeLiberato, senior counsel at the ACLU’s Capital Punishment Project. “Tennessee has the forensic evidence that could help answer that question, and they must test it before it is too late. There is no justification for barreling towards an execution while DNA evidence that could prove who really committed this crime remains untested.”
At trial, Mr. Carruthers was forced to represent himself because his trial judge became frustrated with his repeated dismissal of court-appointed counsel — which filings allege was “due to his longstanding and well-documented mental illness.” Mr. Carruthers did not ask to represent himself and repeatedly requested representation.Postconviction attorneys for Mr. Carruthers wrote in a 2019 filing that his performance at trial was “one of the most singularly inept, ineffective, and disastrous cross-examinations possible, one that seemed designed to secure not only a guilty verdict, but a death sentence.”
In February 2026, Mr. Carruthers’ attorneys from the Tennessee Federal Public Defender’s Office filed a motion arguing their client cannot legally be executed because of his severe mental illness. According to the filing, Mr. Carruthers has a “pervasive and all-consuming obsession that a cabal of corrupt judges, prosecutors, and defense attorneys have conspired to secure his conviction and death sentence.” His attorneys detail his persistent belief that his execution date is simply a threat to get him to accept a plea deal, and that he believes illegal wiretapping of his recorded prison calls entitles him to millions of dollars in damages. The filing noted that Mr. Carruthers has called the Tennessee Federal Public Defender’s office as often as 300 times in one day.
Under Ford v. Wainwright (1986) and Panetti v. Quarterman (2007), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Eighth Amendment prohibits the execution of a person who cannot rationally understand the reason for their execution.Mr. Carruthers’ attorneys argue that his documented history of psychiatric disorders renders his execution unconstitutional. Senior Judge Mark Ward denied counsel’s competency motion for Mr. Carruthers, and news reporting indicates his counsel will appeal that decision.
ACLU Demands DNA Testing That Could Prove Innocence of Tony Carruthers, Man on Tennessee Death Row, ACLU, April 9, 2026; Steven Hale, Carruthers denied, Nashville Banner, March 20, 2026; Steven Hale, Tennessee Man’s Attorneys Say Psychotic Delusions Prove He Is Mentally Incompetent To Be Executed, Nashville Banner, March 9, 2026.