In hon­or of Pride Month and com­mem­o­rat­ing the 55^th anniver­sary of the Stonewall upris­ing, the Death Penalty Information Center is pleased to present a new resource about how use of the death penal­ty affects LGBTQ+ peo­ple. We take a com­pre­hen­sive look at top­ics rang­ing from America’s his­to­ry of pun­ish­ing queer sex with exe­cu­tion, to dis­crim­i­na­to­ry com­ments made against queer defen­dants in cap­i­tal tri­als, to the chal­lenges of gen­der tran­si­tion on death…

In this month’s episode of Discussions with DPIC, Managing Director Anne Holsinger speaks with Jessica Sutton, prin­ci­pal attor­ney with Phillips Black, a non­prof­it pub­lic inter­est law firm focused cap­i­tal defense. Ms. Sutton has rep­re­sent­ed clients fac­ing the death penal­ty in more than a dozen juris­dic­tions across the U.S. and at all stages of pro­ceed­ings. In recog­ni­tion of Pride month, Ms. Sutton dis­cuss­es the unique chal­lenges LGBTQ+ peo­ple face in the cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment sys­tem and…

A June 18, 2024 arti­cle pub­lished in the Assembly exam­ines the com­pli­cat­ed rela­tion­ships fathers on North Carolina’s death row have with their chil­dren, as they grap­ple dai­ly with the uncer­tain­ty of their sen­tence. The author, Waverly McIver, high­lights the hard­ship these fam­i­lies endure through the expe­ri­ences of two death-sen­tenced pris­on­ers, Jason Hurst and Terry…

In 2006, Ramiro Gonzales (pic­tured as a child) con­fessed to the mur­der, kid­nap­ping, and rape of Bridget Townsend and was sen­tenced to death. Texas death sen­tenc­ing pro­ce­dures unique­ly require cap­i­tal juries to pre­dict whether a defen­dant is like­ly to com­mit future acts of vio­lence. At Mr. Gonzales’ tri­al, psy­chi­a­trist Dr. Edward Gripon tes­ti­fied for the state and told the jury that Mr. Gonzales ​“has demon­strat­ed a ten­den­cy to want to con­trol, to manip­u­late, and to take advan­tage of certain…

On June 19, 2024, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals set aside 68-year-old Kerry Max Cook’s con­vic­tion, find­ing him to be ​“actu­al­ly inno­cent.” Describing Mr. Cook’s case as ​“one of the most notable mur­der cas­es of the last half-cen­tu­ry,” the major­i­ty opin­ion explains that ​“when it comes to sol­id sup­port for actu­al inno­cence, this case con­tains it all — uncon­tro­vert­ed Brady vio­la­tions, proof of false tes­ti­mo­ny, admis­sions of per­jury, and new sci­en­tif­ic evi­dence.” The Death Penalty Information…