State & Federal

Connecticut

History of the Death Penalty

In colo­nial Connecticut, cap­i­tal crimes includ­ed idol­a­try, witch­craft, and blasphemy.

Famous Cases

The first per­son exe­cut­ed for witch­craft in what is now the United States was Achsah Young, who was exe­cut­ed in Hartford in 1647.

In 1786, Hannah Occuish, a 12-year-old Native American girl, was hanged in New London for the mur­der of a young white girl. She may have been the youngest per­son ever exe­cut­ed in the United States.

The last per­son exe­cut­ed in Connecticut who had exhaust­ed all appeals was Frank Wojulewicz, who was exe­cut­ed in 1959 for mur­der­ing a police offi­cer and bystander while com­mit­ting a rob­bery. The two men exe­cut­ed since then both dropped appeals and vol­un­teered” for execution.

Notable Commutations/​Clemencies

Connecticut is one of five states that gives clemen­cy author­i­ty to a board, rather than the gov­er­nor. No death row pris­on­er was grant­ed clemen­cy dur­ing the peri­od in which the death penal­ty had been reinstated.

Milestones in Abolition/​Reinstatement

In 2009, the Connecticut leg­is­la­ture passed a bill to abol­ish the death penal­ty, but the bill was vetoed by Governor M. Jodi Rell.

In 2012, Connecticut abol­ished the death penal­ty for future crimes. Eleven men remained on death row until 2015, when the Connecticut Supreme Court ruled by a vote of 4 – 3 in State v. Santiago that the death penal­ty vio­lat­ed the state con­sti­tu­tion. The Court indi­cat­ed at that time that the remain­ing death row pris­on­ers were enti­tled to be resen­tenced to life with­out parole. However, after one of the jus­tices in the Santiago major­i­ty left the Court, pros­e­cu­tors sought and were grant­ed per­mis­sion to re-open the issue. On May 26, 2016, in State v. Peeler, the Court reaf­firmed its hold­ing in Santiago by a vote of 5 – 2.

The remain­ing death-row pris­on­ers were resen­tenced one at a time, as their cas­es were decid­ed in the low­er courts. On December 6, 2018, Richard Roszkowski became the last of the eleven for­mer­ly death-row pris­on­ers to be for­mal­ly resen­tenced to life with­out pos­si­bil­i­ty of release. 

Other Interesting Facts

Connecticut car­ried out only one exe­cu­tion in the mod­ern era of the death penal­ty. Michael Ross was exe­cut­ed by lethal injec­tion in 2005 after giv­ing up his appeals.

Bear Mountain. Public domain photo.

Connecticut Execution Totals Since 1976


News & Developments


News

Jan 13, 2025

Connecticut Lawmakers Introduce Bill to Prohibit the Production and Manufacturing of Lethal Injection Drugs and Other Materials for Executions

Five vials of clear liquid, varying sizes. One is on its side with a syringe in it.

On January 10, 2025, three Connecticut law­mak­ers intro­duced a bill that would make it ille­gal to man­u­fac­ture and sell any drugs or med­ical devices in the state meant to car­ry out the death penal­ty. In 2024, Connecticut-based com­pa­ny Absolute Standards was iden­ti­fied as the source of lethal injec­tion drugs used in 13 fed­er­al exe­cu­tions in 2020 and 2021. In a let­ter to the bill’s spon­sors, John Criscio, President of Absolute Standards, said the com­pa­ny ceased production…

Read More

News

Jul 02, 2024

Federal Execution-Drug Supplier Says It Will No Longer Produce Pentobarbital for Executions

Connecticut-based com­pa­ny Absolute Standards, which was iden­ti­fied as the source of lethal injec­tion drugs used in 13 fed­er­al exe­cu­tions in 2020 and 2021, has said it will no longer pro­duce the drug used in exe­cu­tions — pen­to­bar­bi­tal. In a let­ter to two Connecticut law­mak­ers, John Criscio, pres­i­dent of Absolute Standards, said the com­pa­ny ceased pro­duc­ing pen­to­bar­bi­tal in December 2020, and has no inten­tion to resume any pro­duc­tion or sale of pen­to­bar­bi­tal.” Mr. Criscio’s let­ter explains that…

Read More
Connecticut | Death Penalty Information Center

Capital Case Roundup — Death Penalty Court Decisions the Week of August 32020

NEWS (8/​6/​20) — Connecticut: The Connecticut Supreme Court grant­ed a new tri­al to for­mer death-row pris­on­er Lazale Ashby. The court ruled that the pros­e­cu­tion had vio­lat­ed Ashby’s Sixth Amendment right to coun­sel by using a jail­house infor­mant … to delib­er­ate­ly elic­it cer­tain incrim­i­nat­ing state­ments from the defen­dant.” The court said that the infor­mant, who had a past his­to­ry of pro­vid­ing assis­tance to pros­e­cu­tors, had been act­ing as an agent of the state when he extract­ed incrim­i­nat­ing infor­ma­tion from Ashby out­side the pres­ence of coun­sel. As a con­se­quence, the court found, the evi­dence the infor­mant pro­vid­ed was the prod­uct of an uncoun­seled inter­ro­ga­tion and there­fore was inadmissible.

Connecticut prospec­tive­ly abol­ished the death penal­ty in 2015, and the state supreme court sub­se­quent­ly ruled that apply­ing the repealed statute to those remain­ing on the state’s death row vio­lat­ed the state con­sti­tu­tion. Ashby’s death sen­tence was vacat­ed as a result of that rul­ing, and he was resen­tenced to life with­out parole on June 20, 2018. However, the abo­li­tion of the death penal­ty did not affect the sta­tus of Ashby’s court chal­lenges to the con­sti­tu­tion­al­i­ty of his conviction.

News

Jan 12, 2018

Experience Shows No Parade of Horribles” Following Abolition of the Death Penalty

States that have recent­ly abol­ished the death penal­ty have not expe­ri­enced the parade of hor­ri­bles” — includ­ing increased mur­der rates — pre­dict­ed by death-penal­ty pro­po­nents, accord­ing to death-penal­ty experts who par­tic­i­pat­ed in a pan­el dis­cus­sion at the 2017 American Bar Association nation­al meet­ing in New York City. Instead, the pan­elists said, abo­li­tion appears to have cre­at­ed oppor­tu­ni­ties to move for­ward with oth­er broad­er criminal justice…

Read More