As Seminole County pros­e­cu­tors seek the death penal­ty against Clemente Javier Aguirre-Jarquin a sec­ond time despite sub­stan­tial evi­dence impli­cat­ing anoth­er sus­pect, the Florida judge who ini­tial­ly sen­tenced Aguirre-Jarquin to death now says he should not be con­vict­ed. Retired Judge O.H. Eaton (pic­tured), who presided over Aguirre-Jarquin’s dou­ble-mur­der tri­al in 2006, said he now believes that the case is a poster child” for the flaws in the death penal­ty sys­tem. The evi­dence I heard dur­ing the tri­al [in 2006] sub­stan­ti­at­ed the ver­dict,” Eaton told the Orlando Sentinel. The evi­dence I’ve heard now does not. … If I knew then what I know now, I prob­a­bly would have ordered the jury’s verdict overturned.” 

Aguirre-Jarquin, an undoc­u­ment­ed Honduran immi­grant, was con­vict­ed of mur­der­ing his next-door neigh­bors, Cheryl Williams and her moth­er Carol Bareis, who were stabbed more than 130 times. Eaton imposed death sen­tences for both mur­ders, based on non-unan­i­mous 7 – 5 and 9 – 3 jury rec­om­men­da­tions for death. Aguirre-Jarquin’s post-con­vic­tion lawyers lat­er dis­cov­ered that the men­tal­ly ill daugh­ter and grand­daugh­ter of the vic­tims, Samantha Williams — who had pro­vid­ed eye­wit­ness tes­ti­mo­ny against Aguirre-Jarquin — had con­fessed to at least five dif­fer­ent peo­ple that she had killed her rel­a­tives. She told one per­son: I’m crazy, I’m evil and I killed my grand­moth­er and my moth­er.” DNA results from blood evi­dence at the crime scene also impli­cat­ed Williams. The Innocence Project, which assist­ed in Aguirre-Jarquin’s post-con­vic­tion rep­re­sen­ta­tion, found that “[n]one of the DNA found on the 84 items that were test­ed matched Aguirre,” but was a match to Williams and the two vic­tims. Eight blood­stains from Williams were found in four dif­fer­ent rooms, each, the Innocence Project said, inch­es away from the vic­tims’ blood.” Based on this evi­dence, the Florida Supreme Court in 2016 unan­i­mous­ly over­turned Aguirre-Jarquin’s con­vic­tion. Seminole County pros­e­cu­tors nonethe­less decid­ed to retry Aguirre-Jarquin, simul­ta­ne­ous­ly argu­ing that Williams’s men­tal health prob­lems make her con­fes­sions unre­li­able, but rely­ing upon her tes­ti­mo­ny against Aguirre-Jarquin in his 2006 tri­al. They also argue that Aguirre-Jarquin — who says he went to his neigh­bors’ home to get beer, found their bod­ies, and tried to revive them — attempt­ed to hide cloth­ing with the vic­tims’ blood on it, and did not call police after dis­cov­er­ing his neigh­bors had been killed. Aguirre-Jarquin said he did not call the police because he feared depor­ta­tion because of his undocumented status.

Florida has more death-row exon­er­a­tions than any oth­er state, with 27. Ninety per­cent of those exon­er­a­tions came in cas­es in which one or more jurors had rec­om­mend­ed a life sentence. 

(Scott Maxwell, Commentary: Florida judge regrets sen­tenc­ing man to die, says sys­tem is flawed, Orlando Sentinel, October 16, 2018; Michael Williams, Someone else’s con­fes­sion got Clemente Aguirre-Jarquin off death row. Now, he faces tri­al for his life — again, Orlando Sentinel, October 12, 2018.) See Innocence.

Citation Guide