Entries by Death Penalty Information Center

Victims of vio­lence and ter­ror are not nec­es­sar­i­ly well served by a sys­tem that promis­es​“clo­sure” in the form of the death penal­ty, accord­ing to a recent Washington Post col­umn by Dahlia Lithwick. Among oth­er cas­es, the author ques­tions the assump­tions in the fed­er­al gov­ern­men­t’s case against Zacarias Moussaoui as it relates to the needs of the fam­i­ly mem­bers from the September 11^th attack: The death penal­ty tri­al of Zacarias Moussaoui has been tout­ed by the…

The U.S. Supreme Court announced on March 24 that it will rehear Kansas v. Marsh. This case involves the con­sti­tu­tion­al­i­ty of Kansas’ death penal­ty law, which was struck down by the state Supreme Court in 2004. Kansas law required a death sen­tence if the jury found that there was an equal bal­ance between the aggra­vat­ing and mit­i­gat­ing fac­tors pre­sent­ed at the sen­tenc­ing hear­ing. The U.S. Supreme Court heard argu­ments ear­li­er in December when Justice O’Connor was still…

Most New Yorkers would choose a sen­tence of life with­out parole (LWOP) over the death penal­ty for those con­vict­ed of mur­der. In a recent poll pub­lished in Newsday, 53% of N.Y. adults said LWOP is the bet­ter penal­ty, where­as only 38% chose the death penal­ty, with 9% uncer­tain. New York’s death penal­ty was found uncon­sti­tu­tion­al by the state’s high­est court in 2004. The leg­is­la­ture elect­ed not to…

After mem­bers of the Wisconsin Senate passed a res­o­lu­tion call­ing for a ref­er­en­dum on rein­stat­ing the death penalt, a Milwaukee Journal Sentinel edi­to­r­i­al crit­i­cized the vote and urged mem­bers of the state Assembly to reject the pro­pos­al. ThoughWisconsin has not had the death penal­ty since 1853, the state leg­is­la­ture has con­sid­ered a rein­state­ment mea­sure dur­ing each of the past 20 years. The Sentinel voiced con­cerns about inno­cence, race, deter­rence, and…

South Dakota has sched­uled the exe­cu­tion of 24-year-old Elijah Page on August 28 for a mur­der com­mit­ted in 2000. Page has dropped his remain­ing appeals. He would be the first per­son exe­cut­ed in the state since it rein­stat­ed cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment in 1979. The last exe­cu­tion in the state was in 1947. South Dakota has only four peo­ple on its death row. Among church lead­ers in South…

After spend­ing 18 years in prison for a crime he did not com­mit, Arthur Mumphrey received a full par­don from Texas Governor Rick Perry. The Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles had unan­i­mous­ly rec­om­mend­ed that Perry par­don Mumphrey based on DNA test results that showed he was not respon­si­ble for assault­ing a 13-year-old girl in 1986, a crime for which Mumphrey was sen­tenced to serve 35 years in prison.​“My action today can­not give back the time he spent in prison, but it does…

New Jersey Attorney General Zulima Farber (pic­tured) recent­ly voiced her sup­port for extend­ing the state’s mora­to­ri­um on exe­cu­tions, not­ing that she does not believe the death penal­ty is a​“nec­es­sary tool” for pros­e­cu­tors and believes cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment does not deter crime. ​“I don’t think it’s a deter­rent. And I under­stand revenge. I think some peo­ple deserve it. But I don’t think it’s a nec­es­sary tool.… I don’t have a philo­soph­i­cal or religious…

Each year, DPIC col­lects rel­e­vant death penal­ty arti­cles that have appeared in print and on media Web sites. Our col­lec­tion cer­tain­ly does not con­tain all such arti­cles, nor do we claim that it rep­re­sents the​“best” arti­cles. It is only a rep­re­sen­ta­tive sam­ple of the exten­sive cov­er­age giv­en to cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment in print in a par­tic­u­lar year. For those inter­est­ed in exam­in­ing this cov­er­age, we have pre­pared an index of the arti­cles from 2005 in PDF…

A jury in Georgia elect­ed to sen­tence James Sullivan to life with­out parole after find­ing him guilty of hir­ing a hit­man to kill his wife in 1987.​“We thought that life impris­on­ment with­out the pos­si­bil­i­ty of parole was enough. We did­n’t want to be the judge about some­body else’s life. We want­ed God to be the judge,” said juror Debra Klayman after the sen­tence was hand­ed down. The jury had the option of the death penal­ty, life with­out parole, or life with parole.

The President’s DNA Initiative has released Principles of Forensic DNA for Officers of the Court, a CD-ROM that address­es the use of DNA in judi­cial pro­ceed­ings. This resource is designed for pros­e­cu­tors, defense attor­neys, and judges, and pro­vides a sim­ple overview of DNA tech­nolo­gies and the issues that arise when DNA evi­dence is pre­sent­ed in court. The top­ics are cov­ered in short para­graphs accom­pa­nied by illus­tra­tions, and links to oth­er resources are…