Entries by Death Penalty Information Center


News 

Mar 142006

Execution of the Mentally Ill

A new report issued by Amnesty International exam­ines the issue of men­tal ill­ness and the death penal­ty. The report notes that the U.S. Supreme Court’s deci­sions to halt the exe­cu­tions of juve­nile offend­ers and those with men­tal retar­da­tion left a ques­tion mark over anoth­er cat­e­go­ry of offend­er, the men­tal­ly ill. In the report, Amnesty asks:​“If the dimin­ished cul­pa­bil­i­ty asso­ci­at­ed with youth and men­tal retar­da­tion ren­der the death penal­ty an excessive…

Read More

News 

Mar 132006

Death Penalty in California is Very Costly

According to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, hous­ing an inmate in California’s cor­rec­tions sys­tem costs an aver­age of $34,150 per year, though that fig­ure is high­er for those on death row or serv­ing a sen­tence of life-with­­­out-parole. In cap­i­tal cas­es, a more expen­sive inves­ti­ga­tion and pros­e­cu­tion process, as well as long and com­pli­cat­ed appeals, rais­es the costs sig­nif­i­cant­ly. Only about 1% of homi­cides in the state are tried as…

Read More

News 

Mar 102006

INTERNATIONAL: Mandatory Death Penalty Struck Down in Bahamas

The British Privy Council in London unan­i­mous­ly struck down the impo­si­tion of manda­to­ry death sen­tences in the Bahamas. This land­mark deci­sion held that the law​“should be con­strued as impos­ing a dis­cre­tionary and not a manda­to­ry sen­tence of death.” The Privy Council rul­ing said that the manda­to­ry death penal­ty should have been regard­ed as inhu­mane and degrad­ing pun­ish­ment as ear­ly as 1973.​“The ram­i­fi­ca­tions and con­se­quences of the Privy Council’s ruling…

Read More

News 

Mar 092006

Patriot Act Likely to Curtail Death Penalty Appeals

Congress recent­ly passed the re-autho­riza­­­­­tion of the Patriot Act and this bill is like­ly to cur­tail the appeals of state death row inmates in fed­er­al courts. The leg­is­la­tion, which is due to be signed into law this week by President Bush, would allow states to obtain approval of their sys­tems of rep­re­sen­ta­tion in death penal­ty cas­es from the U.S. Attorney General rather than from the fed­er­al courts, as required under a pre­vi­ous law. Once approval is granted,…

Read More

News 

Mar 082006

Three Men Facing Federal Execution Receive Stays

Judge Ellen Segal Huvelle of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued a stay of exe­cu­tion for three co-defen­­­dants on fed­er­al death row who were sched­uled to be exe­cut­ed in May. Judge Huvelle’s order delays the exe­cu­tions indef­i­nite­ly and is the result of a lethal injec­tion chal­lenge raised by the three men, James H. Roane Jr., Richard Tipton, and Cory Johnson. This case marks at least the sixth time since January that exe­cu­tions have been…

Read More

News 

Mar 072006

NEW RESOURCE: Wounds That Do Not Bind: Victim-based Perspectives on the Death Penalty

Wounds That Do Not Bind: Victim-based Perspectives on the Death Penalty, a new book by James R. Acker and David Reed Karp, exam­ines how fam­i­ly mem­bers and advo­cates for vic­tims address the impact of cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment. The book presents the per­son­al sto­ries of vic­tims’ fam­i­ly mem­bers and their inter­ac­tions with the crim­i­nal jus­tice sys­tem. It also exam­ines the rel­e­vant areas of legal research, includ­ing the use of vic­tim impact evi­dence in capital…

Read More

News 

Mar 032006

Death Penalty Not Sought in Three High-Profile Cases

Prosecutors in Maryland, New Jersey, and Delaware have all cho­sen to seek life sen­tences in three high-pro­­­file mur­der cas­es. Among oth­er con­cerns, they not­ed their wish to bring com­fort to vic­tims’ fam­i­lies and to secure the pub­lic’s longterm safe­ty. The pros­e­cu­tors expressed con­fi­dence that not seek­ing the death penal­ty was the right choice in these cas­es. Maryland pros­e­cu­tors announced that they will not seek the death penal­ty for sniper John Allen Muhammad, who…

Read More

News 

Mar 032006

PUBLIC OPINION: Support for Death Penalty Declines in California

Californians’ sup­port for the death penal­ty is declin­ing accord­ing to results of a new sur­vey con­duct­ed in February 2006 by the Field Poll. The statewide poll revealed that only 63% of respon­dents favor keep­ing the death penal­ty for seri­ous crimes, a fig­ure that is low­er than the 72% sup­port for the death penal­ty mea­sured in 2002 and sig­nif­i­cant­ly less than the 83% who voiced sup­port for cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment in both 1985 and 1986. The sur­vey also found…

Read More

News 

Mar 022006

NEW RESOURCE: Death By Design” Examines Psychology Behind U.S. Death Penalty

In his new book, Death by Design: Capital Punishment as a Social Psychological System, Craig Haney argues that cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment, and par­tic­u­lar­ly the events that lead to death sen­tenc­ing itself, are main­tained through a sys­tem that dis­tances and dis­en­gages peo­ple from the true nature of the task. Haney, a pro­fes­sor of psy­chol­o­gy at the University of California, Santa Cruz, relies on his own research and that oth­er of oth­er sci­en­tists in approaching the…

Read More

News 

Mar 012006

Pennsylvania Jurors Opting for Life Sentences

Lawyers and pros­e­cu­tors in Allegheny County (Pittsburgh), Pennsylvania say that con­cerns about inno­cence and shift­ing pub­lic atti­tudes on the death penal­ty have caused jurors in the coun­ty to​“lose their taste” for cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment. In each of the past 8 cap­i­tal cas­es tried, jurors spared the life of the defen­dant.​“My per­son­al belief is that the heydey of the death penal­ty is over,” said Allegheny County attor­ney Caroline Roberto, for­mer pres­i­dent of the…

Read More