Entries by Death Penalty Information Center


News 

Aug 302005

NEW RESOURCE: Victims of Justice Revisited” Explores the Extraordinary Case of Rolando Cruz

Victims of Justice Revisited, a new book by Thomas Frisbie and Randy Garrett, details the inno­cence case of Rolando Cruz, an Illinois man who was wrong­ly con­vict­ed and sent to death row for the 1983 mur­der of 10-year-old Jeanine Nicarico. The book tells the sto­ry of Cruz and his two co-defen­­­dants, Alejandro Hernandez and Stephen Buckley, from the day of the crime to the ground­break­ing tri­al of sev­en law enforce­ment offi­cers accused of con­spir­ing to deny Cruz a fair…

Read More

News 

Aug 292005

Seriously Mentally Ill Man Receives Commutation in Indiana

Arthur Baird, who was to be exe­cut­ed on August 31 for mur­der­ing his par­ents in Indiana, received a com­mu­ta­tion to a life sen­tence from Governor Mitch Daniels. (WishTV​.com, Ch.8, Indianapolis, Aug. 29, 2005). Two mem­bers of the Indiana Supreme Court had writ­ten that Baird was​“only mar­gin­al­ly in touch with real­i­ty,” in a deci­sion in which the major­i­ty had allowed the exe­cu­tion to go for­ward. A report to the court from Dr. Philip M. Coons, a professor…

Read More

News 

Aug 252005

Texas Woman Faces Execution Despite Questions Regarding Her Guilt

Update: Frances Newton was exe­cut­ed in Texas on September 14, 2005. As Texas pre­pares to exe­cute Frances Newton on September 14, her attor­neys have raised ques­tions in a clemen­cy peti­tion about her guilt based on new evi­dence, includ­ing con­flict­ing accounts of whether inves­ti­ga­tors recov­ered a sec­ond gun at the crime scene. Newton, who would be the first black woman exe­cut­ed in the state since the Civil War, was sen­tenced to death for the 1987 killings of her…

Read More

News 

Aug 252005

NEW VOICES: Originator of Lethal Injection Voices Regrets, Opposes Death Penalty

Bill Wiseman, the for­mer Oklahoma leg­is­la­tor who intro­duced lethal injec­tion as a method of exe­cu­tion in the U.S. in order to make death row inmates’ deaths more humane, now regrets hav­ing pushed the con­cept into law. He notes that he intro­duced the mea­sure in order to ease his shame for hav­ing vot­ed to restore the death penal­ty in Oklahoma, stat­ing,​“I’m sor­ry for what I did. I hope some­day to off­set it by help­ing us real­ize that cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment is wrong and…

Read More

News 

Aug 242005

NEW RESOURCE: The Cultural Lives of Capital Punishment”

The Cultural Lives of Capital Punishment, a new book edit­ed by pro­fes­sor Austin Sarat of Amherst College and lec­tur­er Christian Boulanger of the Free University in Berlin, exam­ines the com­pli­cat­ed dynam­ics of the death penal­ty in eleven nations to deter­mine what role cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment plays in defin­ing a coun­try’s polit­i­cal and cul­tur­al iden­ti­ty. The edi­tors note that a nation’s val­ues and cul­tur­al his­to­ry influ­ence its rela­tion­ship with capital…

Read More

News 

Aug 222005

STUDIES: Blacks Struck from Juries at Twice the Rate of Whites

A two-year Dallas Morning News inves­ti­ga­tion of jury selec­tion in Dallas County has revealed that pros­e­cu­tors exclude blacks from juries at more than twice the rate they reject whites, and that race is the most impor­tant per­son­al trait affect­ing which jurors pros­e­cu­tors reject. The paper’s review also found that when poten­tial black and white jurors answered key ques­tions about crim­i­nal jus­tice issues the same way, blacks were reject­ed at a high­er rate. The study…

Read More

News 

Aug 222005

NEW VOICES: Former Federal Prosecutor Criticizes the Withholding of Critical Evidence

John P. Flannery, a for­mer fed­er­al pros­e­cu­tor and spe­cial coun­sel to the U.S. Senate and House Judiciary Committees, recent­ly not­ed the broad prob­lems in Virginia’s crim­i­nal jus­tice sys­tem that could lead to con­vict­ing the inno­cent:We are con­vict­ing inno­cent peo­ple in Virginia because of false eye­wit­ness tes­ti­mo­ny, false con­fes­sions, over-eager snitch­es, faulty foren­sics, bad defense lawyers but also, and this is the worst of all, because of prosecutorial…

Read More

News 

Aug 182005

Important Court Decisions in New Jersey and Louisiana

The Appellate Division of New Jersey​’s Superior Court in State v. Jimenez announced new pro­ce­dures on August 17, 2005 for decid­ing claims of men­tal retar­da­tion by a defen­dant fac­ing the death penal­ty: (a) the State must be put to the bur­den of prov­ing the absence of men­tal retar­da­tion when a col­orable issue is pre­sent­ed; (b) the State’s bur­den is to prove the absence of men­tal retar­da­tion beyond a rea­son­able doubt; (c) the jury must be the factfinder;…

Read More

News 

Aug 182005

EDITORIAL: Alabama’s Death Penalty Representation System in Disarray

The Birmingham News sharply crit­i­cized Alabama’s sys­tem of rep­re­sen­ta­tion in death penal­ty cas­es, say­ing that the pub­lic should be out­raged. A lack of even min­i­mal resources and pay has caused attor­neys to with­draw from cas­es and to decline rep­re­sen­ta­tion to indi­gent defen­dants. The paper wrote that this short­age of attor­neys could result in more tri­al errors and longer appeals, putting an undue strain on vic­tims’ fam­i­lies and the entire sys­tem of jus­tice. The…

Read More

News 

Aug 162005

NEW RESOURCE: Research Examines Those Who Volunteer for Execution

A new Michigan Law Review arti­cle by Professor John Blume of Cornell Law School exam­ines the rela­tion­ship between​“vol­un­teer­ing” for exe­cu­tion and sui­cide. Blume found that near­ly 88% of all death row inmates who have​“vol­un­teered” for exe­cu­tion have strug­gled with men­tal ill­ness and/​or sub­stance abuse. He writes that there is an espe­cial­ly strong link between​“vol­un­teerism” and men­tal ill­ness. Of the​“vol­un­teer” exe­cu­tions he reviewed, 14 involved…

Read More