Entries by Death Penalty Information Center


News 

May 122004

NEW VOICES: New York Religious Leaders Unite Against Death Penalty, Call for Moratorium

New York reli­gious lead­ers rep­re­sent­ing a range of faiths and regions recent­ly unit­ed to voice their oppo­si­tion to the death penal­ty and to encour­age a mora­to­ri­um on exe­cu­tions so that issues of fair­ness and accu­ra­cy may be addressed. A state­ment issued by the group not­ed: “[O]ur nation’s con­tin­ued reliance on the death penal­ty is extreme­ly cost­ly, inef­fec­tive in fight­ing crime, unequal­ly applied, and hand­ed out with alarm­ing fre­quen­cy to defen­dants who are…

Read More

News 

May 122004

Abolition of the Death Penalty Gaining Ground in Africa

During the past 10 years, most Commonwealth African coun­tries have moved toward abol­ish­ing the death penal­ty and today almost half of these coun­tries have aban­doned the prac­tice accord­ing to Amnesty International. Government lead­ers from around the con­ti­nent recent­ly met in Entebbe, Uganda, for a two-day sum­mit to dis­cuss cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment. Five Southern African Development Countries have abol­ished cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment, and the num­ber of coun­tries end­ing the death…

Read More

News 

May 112004

Execution With International Repercussions Approaches

EXECUTION WITH INTERNATIONAL REPERCUSSIONS APPROACHES Photo: CuartoscuroOsvaldo Torres is sched­uled to be exe­cut­ed by the state of Oklahoma on May 18, 2004, despite a rul­ing from the International Court of Justice that his rights under the Vienna Convention (and those of 50 oth­er Mexican nation­als on American death rows) were vio­lat­ed. The International Court of Justice is the high­est court of the U.N. and the U.S. has used this court…

Read More

News 

May 072004

Oklahoma Board Recommends Clemency for Mexican National

The Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board has vot­ed to rec­om­mend clemen­cy for death row inmate Osbaldo Torres, a Mexican for­eign nation­al who is sched­uled to be exe­cut­ed on May 18. The Board made its deci­sion after an hour-long hear­ing that includ­ed tes­ti­mo­ny from Carlos de Icaza, Mexican Ambassador to the United States. Icaza told the board that Mexico oppos­es cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment in all cas­es, and that this case was par­tic­u­lar­ly trou­ble­some because no proof…

Read More

News 

May 062004

NEW RESOURCE — America’s Death Penalty: Beyond Repair?

America’s Death Penalty: Beyond Repair?” exam­ines cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment in the U.S. since 1976 through a vari­ety of schol­ar­ly essays that look at crit­i­cal issues such as inno­cence, race, arbi­trari­ness, and inter­na­tion­al human rights law. Reknown death penal­ty expert and law pro­fes­sor Tony Amsterdam notes,​“In these essays, some of our most…

Read More

News 

May 062004

Investigation Reveals Cases of Innocence in Massachusetts

As Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney seeks to rein­state cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment with a​“fool­proof” sys­tem(see ear­li­er What’s New item), a news inves­ti­ga­tion has revealed that 22 state men have served lengthy prison terms over the last two decades for rapes and mur­ders that they did not com­mit. Most of the wrong­ly con­vict­ed inmates were black. Experts say that Boston’s Suffolk County pros­e­cu­tors have wrong­ly con­vict­ed the sec­ond high­est num­ber of inno­cent people in…

Read More

News 

May 062004

North Carolina Lawyers’ Group Recommends Overhaul of Death Penalty

After a review of North Carolina’s death penal­ty, the North Carolina Academy of Trial Lawyers has issued a series of 11 rec­om­men­da­tions that aim to address issues of fair­ness and accu­ra­cy in the state’s cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment statutes. In addi­tion to rec­om­men­da­tions address­ing hid­den evi­dence, mis­tak­en eye­wit­ness iden­ti­fi­ca­tions, dis­crim­i­na­tion, and unre­li­able con­fes­sions, the group urged North Carolina law­mak­ers to enact a moratorium on…

Read More

News 

May 052004

Alabama’s Death Penalty Problems Continue

Questions about the accu­ra­cy and fair­ness of Alabama’s death penal­ty con­tin­ue to sur­face as illus­trat­ed by a series of recent fed­er­al court rul­ings grant­i­ng two new tri­als and one new sen­tenc­ing hear­ing. All of the rul­ings were based on inad­e­quate rep­re­sen­ta­tion pro­vid­ed to the defen­dants.​“Counsel sim­ply pro­vid­ed no defense to the death penal­ty,” Chief U.S. District Judge U.W. Clemon of Birmingham wrote March 31 in giv­ing one of the inmates a new tri­al. The…

Read More

News 

May 042004

NEW VOICES: Massachusetts District Attorneys Criticize Governor’s Death Penalty Plan

District attor­neys from sev­er­al Massachusetts coun­ties, includ­ing Suffolk, Norfolk, Middlesex, Essex and Barnstable, had strong reser­va­tions about Governor Mitt Romney’s attempt to estab­lish a near­ly​“fool­proof” death penal­ty sys­tem in the state. Some not­ed that noth­ing can elim­i­nate the pos­si­bil­i­ty of human error in such cas­es. The dis­trict attor­neys said that the state’s med­ical examiner’s office and crime labs are cur­rent­ly over­whelmed with work, and that the…

Read More

News 

Apr 302004

EXECUTIONS SCHEDULED IN MAY RAISE CRITICAL ISSUES

Three sched­uled exe­cu­tions in May – Osvaldo Torres in Oklahoma, Kelsey Patterson in Texas, and Sammy Perkins in North Carolina – raise trou­bling ques­tions about the appli­ca­tion of the death penal­ty. Torres is a Mexican for­eign nation­al whose exe­cu­tion is sched­uled for May 18, just weeks after the International Court of Justice ruled that the United States should review the cas­es of 51 Mexican for­eign nation­als on death row in the U.S., includ­ing Torres’s case. At issue…

Read More