Entries by Death Penalty Information Center

A District Court pan­el in Florida has endorsed a spe­cial ver­dict form that asks jurors to spec­i­fy what ele­ments of a crime war­rant a death penal­ty. The District Court cer­ti­fied its deci­sion as a mat­ter of great pub­lic impor­tance and asked the Florida Supreme Court to review the rul­ings, not­ing​“this rul­ing could affect many cas­es that may ulti­mate­ly be reviewed by the Supreme Court.” In the orig­i­nal rul­ing in the cap­i­tal case against Alfredie Steele Jr., Pasco…

After less than five hours of delib­er­a­tion, jurors in a fed­er­al death penal­ty case in Maryland returned life sen­tences for two men con­vict­ed ear­li­er of fed­er­al drug con­spir­a­cy charges and firearms vio­la­tions. The fed­er­al case against Michael Taylor and Keon Moses was the first time since 1998 that U.S. pros­e­cu­tors in Baltimore had sought a death sen­tence. The life sen­tences for Taylor and Keon con­tin­ue a nation­al trend iden­ti­fied last year by the Federal Death…

North Carolina may become the first state to enact a mora­to­ri­um on exe­cu­tions through the leg­isla­tive process. A mora­to­ri­um mea­sure has already passed their Senate and is await­ing action in the House. A new Web site launched by the North Carolina Coalition for a Moratorium, www​.ncmora​to​ri​um​.org, con­tains a vast amount of information related…

Just weeks after leg­is­la­tors in Wyoming and South Dakota passed leg­is­la­tion to ban the exe­cu­tion of juve­nile offend­ers, law­mak­ers in Florida are on a sim­i­lar course that may send a bill that elim­i­nates the death penal­ty for those under the age of 18 to Governor Jeb Bush for sig­na­ture into law. Members of the Florida Senate passed the juve­nile death penal­ty ban by a vote of 26 – 12, and the House is expect­ed to take up the mea­sure lat­er this week. Florida…

More than two decades after Max Soffar was sen­tenced to die for a Houston-area triple mur­der, an appel­late court has ruled that his court-appoint­ed attor­ney inad­e­quate­ly rep­re­sent­ed him dur­ing his 1980 tri­al and that he deserves to be retried with­in 120 days or freed from Texas’s death row. Although no evi­dence link­ing Soffar to the crime was ever found and his accounts of the mur­ders, con­tained in what are believed to be false con­fes­sions, var­ied vast­ly from several…

“The Problem of False Confessions in a Post-DNA World,” a recent study pub­lished in the North Carolina Law Review, found that juve­nile offend­ers were involved in 33% of the cas­es where the defen­dant con­fessed to a crime that he or she did not com­mit. Ninety-two per­cent of the cas­es involved false con­fes­sions from indi­vid­u­als under the age of 40, and more than half were under the age of 25.

By a vote of 29 – 19, the United Nations Commission on Human Rights passed a res­o­lu­tion call­ing on all nations to declare a mora­to­ri­um on exe­cu­tions. The res­o­lu­tion cit­ed con­cerns about the fair­ness and accu­ra­cy of the death penal­ty. In order to address these prob­lems, the res­o­lu­tion calls on nations that no longer use the death penal­ty to remove it from their laws, and for coun­tries that con­tin­ue to car­ry out exe­cu­tions to lim­it the num­ber of crimes that…

Researchers at the University of Michigan iden­ti­fied 328 crim­i­nal cas­es, includ­ing 73 death penal­ty cas­es, over the last 15 years in which the defen­dant was ulti­mate­ly exon­er­at­ed. The study sug­gest­ed that many more inno­cent peo­ple are in prison today. Most of the cas­es stud­ied involved mur­der and rape, crimes that are sub­ject­ed to the most intense police inves­ti­ga­tion but that can also pro­vide defen­dants with the oppor­tu­ni­ty to prove their inno­cence based on…

On Monday, April 19, the United States Supreme Court will hear argu­ments in the case of Schriro v. Summerlin that will deter­mine whether a pri­or deci­sion applies only to some death row inmates in the first stage of their appeals or to all inmates in the affect­ed states. In 2002, the Court held in Ring v. Arizona that juries, not judges, must decide who is eli­gi­ble for the death penal­ty. The new rul­ing could affect over 100 death row inmates in at least 5 states. At the…

District Attorney Paul Connick has agreed that Ryan Matthews, a juve­nile offend­er on Louisiana’s death row, deserves a new tri­al. Matthews has main­tained his inno­cence since his arrest. Attorneys for Matthews will use the retri­al as an oppor­tu­ni­ty to present new DNA evi­dence that they believe exon­er­ates their client. Testing of sev­en DNA pro­files gath­ered as part of key evi­dence in the case excludes Matthews as the offend­er, and sev­er­al point to the guilt of another…