Entries by Death Penalty Information Center


News 

Jul 182003

NEW VOICES: Australian Judge and Parent of Bombing Victim Rejects Death Penalty

Brian Deegan, a mag­is­trate in South Australia who lost his son in the October 2002 Sari night­club bomb­ing in Bali, recent­ly stat­ed that he believes the ter­ror­ists who com­mit­ed that crime should not receive the death penal­ty, but should be sen­tenced to a term of life in prison with­out parole. In an opin­ion piece in The Australian,…

Read More

News 

Jul 182003

Texas Lawmakers Receive Failing Grade from Criminal Justice Reform Leaders

As the Texas leg­isla­tive ses­sion came to a close, crim­i­nal jus­tice reform advo­cates gave law­mak­ers a fail­ing grade for their work in address­ing prob­lems in the state’s legal sys­tem. Senator Rodney Ellis of Houston joined an array of legal experts to crit­i­cize the state leg­is­la­tors’ inabil­i­ty to pass mea­sures to end the exe­cu­tion of juve­nile offend­ers, to strength­en the con­sular noti­fi­ca­tion process for for­eign nation­als, and to require the Texas Board of…

Read More

News 

Jul 182003

Kansas Lawmakers to Study Death Penalty Costs

The Legislative Coordinating Council of Kansas, a group of leg­isla­tive lead­ers who rep­re­sent the Kansas leg­is­la­ture when it’s not in ses­sion, recent­ly autho­rized com­mit­tees to study three aspects of the state’s cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment law this sum­mer. Among the top­ics under review are the cost of impos­ing the death penal­ty, the state’s fund­ing of the Board of Indigents’ Defense Services and its Death Penalty Unit, and the effec­tive­ness of laws to ensure that mentally ill…

Read More

News 

Jul 182003

ACLU Report Calls for Halt to Executions

The ACLU Capital Punishment Project recent­ly released​“Three Decades Later: Why We Need A Temporary Halt on Executions,” a report that comes just over 30 years after the Supreme Court’s Furman v. Georgia deci­sion that placed a tem­po­rary halt on exe­cu­tions because the death penal­ty was being applied in an arbi­trary, dis­crim­i­na­to­ry, and capri­cious man­ner. While the Supreme Court upheld state cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment statutes writ­ten after Furman in its 1976 Gregg v. Georgia…

Read More

News 

Jul 182003

American Bar Association Endorses North Carolina Death Penalty Moratorium

The American Bar Association (ABA) has voiced sup­port for leg­is­la­tion to impose a two-year mora­to­ri­um on exe­cu­tions in North Carolina while the state stud­ies its death penal­ty. In its announce­ment, the ABA not­ed a​“grow­ing con­sen­sus with­in the legal com­mu­ni­ty that North Carolina urgent­ly needs a mora­to­ri­um on exe­cu­tions until it eval­u­ates issues of fair­ness, due process and pos­si­ble racial bias in its death penal­ty sys­tem.” The bill, which was recently…

Read More

News 

Jul 182003

Law Enforcement Views: Houston Police Chief Voices Concern About Prosecutors

Houston Police Chief C.O. Bradford said that crim­i­nal defen­dants in Texas are at the mer­cy of pros­e­cu­tors in an unfair sys­tem that empha­sizes win­ning rather than jus­tice. Bradford said that he believes there is suf­fi­cient prob­a­ble cause to con­vene a court of inquiry to inves­ti­gate the entire Police Department crime lab, not just the DNA por­tion (see below). Bradford also voiced sup­port for changes that would help to bal­ance the Texas jus­tice sys­tem, which he believes…

Read More

News 

Jul 182003

Death Penalty Costs Cause Concern in Kansas

As Kansas law­mak­ers strug­gle to make ends meet, some are call­ing for an exam­i­na­tion of the costs asso­ci­at­ed with cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment. Senators Steve Morris and Anthony Hensley have oppos­ing views on the death penal­ty, but the men recent­ly joined forces to pro­pose an audit of the state’s death penal­ty. Among oth­er items, the audit will review $9 mil­lion in expens­es filed by the Board of Indigents’ Defense Services between 1995 – 2002. The fund­ing was used to defend those…

Read More

News 

Jul 182003

NEW VOICES: Leading Forensic Scientist Calls For Halt to Executions Because of Faulty DNA Testing

An edi­to­r­i­al by Dr. Cyril H. Wecht, past pres­i­dent of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences, notes that crime labs are over­whelm­ing­ly back­logged with work and that defi­cien­cies of per­son­nel, space and equip­ment in foren­sic sci­ence labs often lead to shod­dy prac­tices and erro­neous test results, as recent­ly exem­pli­fied by the prob­lems uncov­ered at the Houston Police Department DNA lab (see below).

Read More