Conservative com­men­ta­tor Drew Johnson (pic­tured) has a sug­ges­tion for states whose bud­gets have been gut­ted by declin­ing tax rev­enue and ris­ing costs relat­ed to the coro­n­avirus pan­dem­ic: end the death penalty. 

In an April 23, 2020 op-ed for con­ser­v­a­tive news out­let Townhall, Johnson writes, As state pol­i­cy­mak­ers put pro­grams on the chop­ping block in an attempt to bal­ance bud­gets, there’s one failed pol­i­cy that should be first to go: the death penalty.”

Johnson, a Senior Scholar at the National Center for Public Policy Research, a Senior Fellow at the Taxpayers Protection Alliance, and a mem­ber of Conservatives Concerned About the Death Penalty, sup­ports his argu­ment with a litany of stud­ies on the high cost of cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment. He points to research from sev­en states, all of which would save mil­lions of dol­lars by repeal­ing the death penal­ty. On aver­age, through­out America, a death row inmate costs $1.12 mil­lion more than a gen­er­al pop­u­la­tion inmate, accord­ing to a study by Susquehanna University. With 2,620 peo­ple cur­rent­ly on death row in America, $2.9 bil­lion dol­lars could’ve been saved if those inmates had all been sen­tenced to life in prison with­out parole rather than to death,” Johnson explains.

The death penal­ty should be a prime can­di­date for gov­ern­ment cuts, Johnson main­tains, because it pro­vides absolute­ly no ben­e­fit. It doesn’t deter crimes or pro­tect the pub­lic, and it even puts the lives of inno­cent peo­ple at risk.” Citing a 2012 National Research Council review, he says, there is no cred­i­ble evi­dence that the death penal­ty deters mur­der.” Moving to the issue of inno­cence, he writes, Wasting tax dol­lars and fail­ing to pro­tect the pub­lic isn’t even the worst of it. The most trou­bling sin­gle aspect of the death penal­ty is how often states get it wrong. More than 160 Americans have been released from death row due to wrongful convictions.”

With state bud­gets drown­ing in the red, there’s no excuse for pol­i­cy­mak­ers to ignore pub­lic sen­ti­ment and con­tin­ue defend­ing the pricey death penal­ty,” Johnson con­cludes. The mon­ey saved by killing the death penal­ty could be redi­rect­ed to com­pen­sate vic­tims’ fam­i­lies, used to improve polic­ing or men­tal health pro­grams in order to help pre­vent vio­lent crime, or sim­ply put towards fund­ing coro­n­avirus-relat­ed bud­get short­falls. Any option is more rea­son­able than wast­ing mil­lions more tax dol­lars on an expen­sive, unpop­u­lar, failed public policy.”

Citation Guide