DPI Podcast: Discussions With DPI
Lawyers for the Condemned
ABA Guidelines and Standards for Capital Representation
American Bar Association's recommended standards for counsel in capital cases
Overview
The quality of representation a defendant receives in a capital case can make the difference between life and death. Almost all defendants cannot afford to pay for a lawyer, and states differ widely on the standards — if any — for death penalty representation. Accounts of lawyers sleeping or drinking alcohol during the trial, lawyers with racial bias toward their client, lawyers who conduct no investigation or fail to obtain necessary experts, or lawyers simply having no experience with capital cases have been rampant throughout the history of the death penalty.
The right to an attorney is a hallmark of the American judicial system. It is essential that the lawyer be experienced in capital cases, be adequately compensated, and have access to the resources needed to fulfill his or her obligations to the client and the court.
As abuses in the system have been exposed, most states have raised the standards for representation. However, most death-penalty states do not have statewide capital defense organizations, and many counties who are responsible for assigning and compensating lawyers have small budgets and cannot afford the kind of representation a capital case requires.
At Issue
Despite the poor quality of representation in many capital cases, courts have often upheld the convictions and death sentences imposed because of low expectations and the belief that better representation would not have made a difference in the case. Where higher quality counsel and adequate resources have been provided, death sentences have declined dramatically.
What DPIC Offers
DPI has highlighted the key court decisions in this area, as well as the numerous instances in which the system has failed. A number of DPI’s reports discuss the importance of quality representation. The standards for representation approved by the American Bar Association, along with the status of state compliance, are also available.
News & Developments
News
Feb 24, 2026
Scheduled Execution of Billy Kearse Renews Constitutional Alarms About Pace of Executions in Florida
“I am extremely concerned by the recent pace of death warrants and the speed with which the parties and involved entities must carry out their respective duties.” Florida Supreme Court Justice Jorge Labarga wrote those words in 2023, a year in which Florida conducted six executions with an average warrant period of 36 days. Such a pace was already straining the state’s judicial, legal, and prison systems. But in 2025, under the sole authority of Governor Ron DeSantis, the…
Read MoreNews
Jan 07, 2026
New Report Examines Florida’s Unprecedented Execution Pace and Trends in 2025
The United States carried out 47 executions in 2025, and Florida carried out 19 — the highest number in state history and more than double its previous modern record, according to a year-end report from Floridians for Alternatives to the Death Penalty (FADP). Executions in Florida — which averaged one execution every 16 days from February 2025 through December 2025 — accounted for 40% of the 47 executions nationwide, making Florida a clear outlier in the use of the death…
Read MoreNews
Nov 19, 2025
17th Scheduled Execution of 2025 in Florida Raises Concerns Over Non-Unanimous Verdicts and Execution of Veterans
Richard“Malik” Randolph is scheduled to be executed on November 20, 2025, for the 1988 murder of Minnie Ruth McCollum. If carried out, Mr. Randolph’s execution will mark Florida’s 17th execution of the year — more than double the previous record of eight executions in one year, and the seventh execution of a military veteran by the state in 2025. According to his lawyers, Mr. Randolph’s childhood was marked by profound trauma: adopted at five months old, he endured…
Read MoreNews
Oct 23, 2025
Federal Judiciary Budget Crisis and Government Shutdown Ends Funding for Indigent Defendants, Raising Serious Constitutional Concerns
On October 17, 2025, the federal judiciary announced that starting on October 20, the branch would no longer have the funds needed to“sustain full, paid operations.” This latest development is a direct result of the federal government shutdown that began on October 1. Until funding is restored, federal judges will continue their bench duties, but court staff may only perform“activities” necessary for constitutional functions — all without pay. The current…
Read MoreNews
Oct 22, 2025
Veterans in the Spotlight: One Man’s Struggle with Vietnam-Induced PTSD
On Veterans Day, the Death Penalty Information Center will release a new report about veterans and the death penalty, exploring the lasting effects of military service and explaining why military experiences matter when veterans interact with the legal system. This article shares the story of one death-sentenced veteran, Frederick Mendoza. Frederick Mendoza enlisted in the Marine Corps in 1967 as a basic rifleman and served over 18 months in Vietnam. He was on the…
Read More