
Katerine Judson
Courtesy of Ms. Judson
In the September 2025 episode of 12:01: The Death Penalty in Context, DPI’s managing director Anne Holsinger interviews Shaken Baby Syndrome (SBS) expert Katherine Judson. Ms. Judson is Executive Director of the Center for Integrity in Forensic Sciences and former Shaken Baby Syndrome/Abusive Head Trauma Litigation Coordinator for the Wisconsin Innocence Project. In the episode, Ms. Judson provides the history behind Shaken Baby Syndrome, and why it is now known by experts as “junk science.” She also explains how SBS was tragically used as forensic evidence to secure the capital conviction of Robert Roberson in Texas.
Shaken Baby Syndrome, a diagnosis that is now widely discredited, has been used as a prosecution theory to convict individuals of child abuse and related crimes, including homicides, despite a lack of scientific proof behind the theory. Since SBS was first described in the 1970s, experts have discovered many alternative explanations for symptoms that used to be considered undeniable proof of abuse. “Once folks started predicating criminal convictions on [SBS], it became very difficult to make any changes to it,” according to Ms. Judson. “People were very invested in it and resisted any…challenge to this hypothesis that’s really never been proven in any kind of meaningful way.”
Mr. Roberson was convicted of killing his young daughter after pediatricians and a medical examiner identified SBS as the reason for her death, but none of these experts considered her considerable medical history and other explanations for her symptoms. Investigators also cited the “flat and emotionless” demeanor of Mr. Roberson, who was later diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder, as further evidence of his guilt.
At least 41 individuals have now been exonerated from convictions predicated on Shaken Baby Syndrome; many members of the public and prominent citizens are now urgently calling for Mr. Roberson’s release. His execution is scheduled for October 16, 2025, despite Mr. Roberson’s pending appeals. “I think it’s important for people to know that despite what we sometimes see in television and movies, forensic science is not infallible,” Ms. Judson said. “In fact, in many situations, it’s a whole lot of forensic and not very much science…there are other Roberts out there.”