Attorneys rep­re­sent­ing the fam­i­ly of George Stinney, Jr., recent­ly filed a request for a posthu­mous exon­er­a­tion of Mr. Stinney, the youngest per­son exe­cut­ed in the U.S. in the 20th century. 

Stinney, an African-American 14-year-old, was exe­cut­ed in 1944 for the mur­der of two young white girls less than three months after a tri­al that was filled with errors. Although Clarendon County, South Carolina, where the tri­al took place, had a pop­u­la­tion that was 72% black, only whites served on Stinney’s jury. Stinney’s lawyer offered vir­tu­al­ly no defense. His rel­a­tives, who could have offered an ali­bi, were not called to tes­ti­fy. Stinney alleged­ly made a con­fes­sion, but the con­tents of his state­ment have nev­er been revealed. His attor­ney did not file an appeal, so no court ever reviewed his trial. 

In a sup­port­ive brief in the effort to clear Stinney, the Civil Rights and Restorative Justice Project of Northeastern University School of Law stat­ed, The pros­e­cu­tion of George Stinney con­sti­tut­ed a grave mis­car­riage of jus­tice, caus­ing great suf­fer­ing for his fam­i­ly.… Stinney’s shock­ing treat­ment was incon­sis­tent with the most fun­da­men­tal notions of due process, includ­ing but cer­tain­ly not lim­it­ed to the right to effec­tive assis­tance of counsel.”

A hear­ing on the motion for exon­er­a­tion was held in a South Carolina Circuit Court in January 2014.

Citation Guide
Sources

D. Turner, Paperwork Deadline Met in George Stinney, Jr. Case, WLTX, February 24, 2014; DPIC post­ed Mar. 12, 2014). Read the press release and ami­cus curi­ae brief from the Civil Rights and Restorative Justice Project (On the brief, Northeastern University School of Law’s Margaret Burnham and Michael Meltsner, and South Carolina lawyer Armand Derfner).

See Juveniles and Innocence.