On June 1, a unan­i­mous jury in a fed­er­al death penal­ty pros­e­cu­tion in New York vot­ed to impose a life sen­tence on Vincent Basciano, an orga­nized-crime leader who had ear­li­er been con­vict­ed of mur­der, rack­e­teer­ing, and con­spir­a­cy. The pros­e­cu­tors’ lead wit­ness against Basciano was Joseph Massino, a for­mer crime boss who agreed to coop­er­ate with the gov­ern­ment in order to escape a death sen­tence for his own crimes. The fed­er­al gov­ern­ment sought the death penal­ty for Basciano, who was already serv­ing a sen­tence of life with­out parole, despite a request from the tri­al judge who asked the Department of Justice to recon­sid­er seek­ing the death penal­ty because of its high costs and the like­li­hood that Basciano would spend the rest of his life in prison regard­less of the out­come. At the time of the judge’s request, the case had already cost tax­pay­ers $3 mil­lion, and the ulti­mate bill was esti­mat­ed to be as high as $10 mil­lion. After a short delib­er­a­tion, the jury opt­ed for life with­out parole because they did not believe the pros­e­cu­tors’ argu­ments that Basciano posed a future threat and because oth­er crime fig­ures con­vict­ed of worse crimes did not get the death penalty.

(“Jury Does Not Give Federal Death Sentence,” ABC News, June 1, 2011). See Arbitrariness, Costs, and Federal Death Penalty. Although the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment has sought the death penal­ty in over 30 cas­es in New York, only one result­ed in a death sen­tence, and that was over­turned. New York no longer has a death penal­ty statute of its own.

Citation Guide