On April 29, 2025, U.S. District Judge Debora K. Grasham ordered the Idaho Department of Corrections (IDOC) to give media wit­ness­es to an exe­cu­tion audio and visu­al access to the prepa­ra­tion and admin­is­tra­tion of the lethal injec­tion drugs.” The rul­ing stems from a December 2024 law­suit filed by the Associated Press, The Idaho Statesman, and East Idaho News, which argued that media out­lets were being uncon­sti­tu­tion­al­ly pro­hib­it­ed from view­ing key steps” in Idaho’s lethal injec­tion process. Judge Grasham wrote that while it is true that this case con­cerns Idaho’s lethal injec­tion exe­cu­tion pro­ce­dures, it equal­ly con­cerns the public’s First Amendment right of access to the State’s admin­is­tra­tion of the most severe penal­ty enforced by our State.” 

In her order, Judge Grasham not­ed the tra­di­tion of audio and visu­al access to the means and meth­ods used in enact­ing cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment is well doc­u­ment­ed,” and con­clud­ed that access to the means and meth­ods of con­duct­ing an exe­cu­tion, specif­i­cal­ly here the prepa­ra­tion and admin­is­tra­tion of lethal injec­tion drugs, is not ancil­lary infor­ma­tion, but rather part of the process that is inex­tri­ca­bly inter­twined with the exe­cu­tion and has been his­tor­i­cal­ly open to the pub­lic.” Idaho’s cur­rent lethal injec­tion exe­cu­tion pro­to­col allows media wit­ness­es to observe the pris­on­er as he is brought into the exe­cu­tion cham­ber and placed on a gur­ney, as the IV is insert­ed and con­nect­ed, and the actu­al death. However, media wit­ness­es can­not cur­rent­ly observe the prepa­ra­tion and admin­is­tra­tion of the lethal injec­tion drugs because med­ical team mem­bers enter a sep­a­rate, obscured room. 

An attor­ney for IDOC alleged dur­ing a hear­ing in April 2025 that the pub­lic can rely on prison offi­cials to accu­rate­ly report whether the med­ical and exe­cu­tion team suc­cess­ful­ly pre­pare and admin­is­ter lethal injec­tion drugs. He told the court that keep­ing the med­ical team out­side of pub­lic view was to pro­tect their iden­ti­ties. Judge Grasham sug­gest­ed that med­ical team mem­bers could con­ceal their iden­ti­ties through sim­ple face cov­er­ings, gloves, and hats like those already uti­lized by exe­cu­tion team mem­bers who cur­rent­ly oper­ate with­in sight of media wit­ness­es. According to Judge Grasham, prison author­i­ties failed to estab­lish the secre­cy mea­sures for the med­ical team met a valid penological purpose. 

In ear­ly fil­ings for the news out­lets, attor­ney Wendy Olson wrote, “[a]t its core, this case involves the press’s abil­i­ty to ful­fill its sig­nif­i­cant role in the prop­er func­tion­ing of cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment by pro­vid­ing inde­pen­dent pub­lic scruti­ny of the State of Idaho’s exe­cu­tion process.” Ms. Olson point­ed to pre­vi­ous rul­ings from the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals which estab­lished the pub­lic has the right to view an exe­cu­tion from start to fin­ish, includ­ing a 2012 law­suit from the Associated Press in Idaho. In that case, the court ordered IDOC to allow media wit­ness­es to observe the inser­tion of the IV lines estab­lished for the lethal injec­tion drugs. In December 2024, IDOC spokesper­son Sanda Kuzeta-Cerimagic wrote in an email that IDOC is com­mit­ted to trans­paren­cy in the exe­cu­tion process and will con­tin­ue to pro­vide one of the most trans­par­ent exe­cu­tion process­es in the country.” 

Since the 1970s, Idaho has attempt­ed four lethal injec­tion exe­cu­tions, with the most recent attempt in February 2024. At that time, the state attempt­ed to exe­cute Thomas Creech, but the exe­cu­tion was halt­ed after team mem­bers were unable to set an intra­venous (IV) line after an hour of repeat­ed attempts. His attor­neys had warned IDOC offi­cials that his age (then 73) and med­ical con­di­tions, includ­ing Type 2 dia­betes, hyper­ten­sion, and ede­ma, could impact cir­cu­la­tion and vein qual­i­ty. Idaho set anoth­er exe­cu­tion date for Mr. Creech in November 2024, but a fed­er­al dis­trict court issued a stay of exe­cu­tion to allow for addi­tion­al time to con­sid­er Mr. Creech’s legal claims. 

Citation Guide