States with the death penal­ty have con­sis­tent­ly had high­er mur­der rates than states with­out the death penal­ty. If the death penal­ty was act­ing as a deter­rent to mur­der, one might expect that the gap between these two groups would lessen over a long peri­od of time as states using the death penal­ty obtained an advan­tage in reduc­ing mur­ders. However, the gap has grown larg­er over the past 18 years. In 2007, states with the death penal­ty had a 42% high­er mur­der rate than states with­out the death penal­ty. In 1990, the gap was only 4%.

A mur­der rate is obtained by divid­ing the num­ber of mur­ders in a state by the state’s pop­u­la­tion. It is pos­si­ble to obtain a sin­gle mur­der rate for states with the death penal­ty” by adding the total num­ber of mur­ders in such states by the total pop­u­la­tion of these states. A mur­der rate for states with­out the death penal­ty” can be sim­i­lar­ly obtained. To see the results of these cal­cu­la­tions for each year 1990 – 2007, click here. In 2007, the mur­der rate for states with the death penal­ty was 5.83 and for states with­out the death penal­ty it was 4.10, a 42% dif­fer­ence. The nation­al mur­der rate in 2007 was 5.6.

(Murder rates from FBI Uniform Crime Report, cal­cu­la­tions by David Cooper; DPIC, Nov. 25, 2008). See Deterrence.

Citation Guide