Warren Hill (pic­tured) is sched­uled to be exe­cut­ed on July 18 in Georgia despite being pre­vi­ous­ly found intel­lec­tu­al­ly dis­abled. The U.S. Supreme Court in Atkins v. Virgnia (2002) banned the exe­cu­tion of indi­vid­u­als with intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ties (men­tal retar­da­tion), but allowed each state to set guide­lines for deter­min­ing whether an inmate has such a con­di­tion. In Georgia, cap­i­tal defen­dants are required to prove men­tal retar­da­tion” beyond a rea­son­able doubt. It is the only state in the coun­try that sets such a high bur­den of proof for such claims. Earlier, a state judge found that Hill was intel­lec­tu­al­ly dis­abled, but under a low­er legal thresh­hold than is required in the statute. In 2003, the Georgia Supreme Court reversed the judge’s rul­ing in a 4 – 3 vote, hold­ing that Hill’s lawyers had failed to clear the thresh­old of beyond a rea­son­able doubt.” Last year, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit upheld the Georgia Supreme Court. Writing for the major­i­ty, Judge Frank Hull said fed­er­al law man­dates that this fed­er­al court leave the Georgia Supreme Court deci­sion alone — even if we believe it incor­rect or unwise.” Brian Kammer, one of Hill’s lawyers, said he will ask the Board of Pardons and Paroles to grant Hill clemen­cy. Kammer said, Executing Warren Hill, a 52-year-old man whom a court has found to be more like­ly than not men­tal­ly retard­ed, would be a ter­ri­ble mis­car­riage of jus­tice.” UPDATE: On July 16, Georgia’s Board of Pardons denied clemen­cy. UPDATE: Georgia’s Supreme Court stayed Hill’s exe­cu­tion to review the state’s lethal injec­tion pro­to­col. UPDATE 1/​28/​15: Warren Hill was exe­cut­ed on January 272015

Hill was sen­tenced to death for the mur­der of a fel­low inmate in 1990

(B. Rankin, State sets exe­cu­tion for inmate judged men­tal­ly dis­abled,” Atlanta Journal-Constitution, July 3, 2012. See Intellectual Disability and Arbitrariness. Listen to DPIC’s pod­cast on Intellectual Disability. For more infor­ma­tion, see Amnesty International’s page.

Citation Guide