As inves­ti­ga­tors con­tin­ue to scru­ti­nize the Houston Crime Lab’s his­to­ry of shod­dy prac­tices and inac­cu­rate test results, includ­ing evi­dence in cap­i­tal cas­es, an op-ed in the Houston Chronicle called for District Attorney Chuck Rosenthal and Houston Police Chief Clarence Bradford to recuse them­selves from the inves­ti­ga­tion to ensure a fair review:

To date, District Attorney Chuck Rosenthal has refused to recuse him­self from the inves­ti­ga­tion, instead insist­ing that his office can impar­tial­ly inves­ti­gate the wrong­do­ing, even though it is pos­si­ble that his office may have known about the wrongdoing.
Like Rosenthal, Chief Bradford has also obsti­nate­ly refused to acknowl­edge that an out­side, inde­pen­dent inves­ti­ga­tor is called for. However, there is a spe­cif­ic rea­son that Rosenthal should recuse him­self regard­less of the fate that befalls Bradford. The DA’s office has a sig­nif­i­cant and unmis­tak­able con­flict of inter­est in the mat­ter because that office defends the reli­a­bil­i­ty of the con­vic­tions and death sen­tences of death row inmates from Harris County. As a result of what we have learned about the crime lab, many of those inmates now have new and viable legal claims that are pred­i­cat­ed on the fail­ures of that lab. The DA’s office sim­ply can­not per­form an impar­tial inves­ti­ga­tion while simul­ta­ne­ous­ly oppos­ing the legal efforts of those death row inmates.

(Op-ed, Houston Chronicle, June 20, 2003). See DPIC’s report on Texas death penaty.

Citation Guide